[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Here’s an unasked question: If there are “boosters” needed, will they too fall under the EUA or will those need a separate EUA?
The FDA is a bureaucratic department hired by the appointed HHS Secretary; no A&C.
Are we on the verge of continuous EUAs for the COOF?
At what point do the people raise their voice about UNELECTED pseudo-scientists making health decisions for them?

[greeneyes]

Since their are treatments available that Doctors have had successful outcomes, there should not be any EUA to begin with. The treatment should be forced to go through the whole FDA minimum 2 year process to obtain FDA approval.

The doctor I listened to today, said people over 60 who take the virus will likely expire within 3 years.

Other younger people will likely expire within 10 years, and are likely to have allergies, cognitive impairment, and infertility issues.

She said the vaccines are not safe, and are not necessary.
So who knows what dog and pony show they are planning on next. But if someone could get a hold of the Rockefeller Plan—it was spelled out there over a decade ago.

There's no telling what they actually have in those vaccines, and they sure aren't taking the time to disclose it either. If I was gonna consider it, I'd demand to see the product information sheets to study before even considering it.

These people are a bunch of genocidal pathological psychopathic criminals they are apt to do anything that will benefit them. nuff said - and I'm off to try to get a little sleep.

[WildHighlander57]

If continuous EUAs are made for shots, then this means that by law, they can’t be made mandatory.