Funny the article is all about having the wrong argument, and is itself having the wrong argument. The owners of the Suess legacy have decided not to publish those books anymore. Which is their prerogative. Because they own it. Every case he makes actually winds up supporting them. It’s their property, they don’t have to publish it.
It is also eBay's prerogative to ban all sales of existing copies of the books.
It is my prerogative to complain about censorship and book banning by woke corporations catering to the far left.
Absolutely.
But trying to prevent the sale of already published books is beyond that.