--------------------------
Posted on 02/20/2021 1:56:44 PM PST by ransomnote
We know that the press remarked on the unprecedented step of two nuke footballs in play (President Trump left with one). Uhmmmm...no. Biden’s is made by Tonka Toys. He can’t complain about it, either (”Hey, my handlers just tried to nuke Israel and it didn’t work!”).
***********************
This reminds me of “The Q-Bomb” from The “Mouse That Roared”. It didn’t go off either.
I’ve been thinking about the SCOTUS actions of today. I’m a lawyer. Been retired a long time but I worked at a huge international law firm for years and worked on many cases that involved extensive legal research using Supreme Court cases; even so, I do not consider myself to be an expert in constitutional law because I’ve been out of it too long. Ok, enough credentialing.
First of all I do not think that the Great Awakening hinges on anything SCOTUS does.
Second, historically SCOTUS will take the most narrow view possible in any matter. This means given half a chance the court will slither out of taking a stand.
[Also, as a footnote, I think it is a mistake to appoint academics to the high court because they have so little practical experience. Their existence is comprised of niggling argumentation. (Makes me nuts) Look at who dissented the loudest—Thomas. Not an academic. He alone truly understands the practical aspects of a corrupt election.]
Ok. Here’s what I think was Trump’s aim was with respect to all his judicial appointments: to end judicial activism and social engineering. Read: Roe v. Wade and other csses.
Yes, the judiciary is somewhat connected to Q’s messaging. But the judiciary is NOT the driver. The Q story is political. The courts should not ever be political by design of the founders. Trump was trying to move the entire judiciary back to the founding principles so as to undo many years of judicial activism. I think this part of the story is still inconclusive but even in the 9th Circuit huge positive change has happened.
Finally, I think that we make a mistake of thinking we have any idea whatsoever how this movie ends. I was stunned that Trump was not inaugurated. But looking back I am starting to think the Great Awakening hasn’t yet happened—it’s only started.
So in conclusion, I’m not surprised the SCOTUS kicked the can (but I’m with Thomas and think it was wrong to not hear the cases. I think that Kavanaugh and Barrett were put there for non-political purposes. (I think they might also be afraid of being Trump sycophants which would make them cowards if so, but we have no way of knowing that.)
The SCOTUS decisions today are going to be looked on as irrelevant after all is said and done. So, everyone, don’t be discouraged. The military is the main actor.
"Supreme Court narrowly turned down the Trump election cases today (unanimously rejected the Wood/Powell cases, as forecast), with the key vote being guess who? ACB. Barrett turned turncoat. Again. Of note, of the 5 Justices with lifelong federalist society memberships (Thomas was not), 3 declined to take cert. Thomas' dissent, toward the end of the orders document, is well worth the read."
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022221zor_2cp3.pdf
--------------------------
First of all I do not think that the Great Awakening hinges on anything SCOTUS does.
Second, historically SCOTUS will take the most narrow view possible in any matter. This means given half a chance the court will slither out of taking a stand.
[Also, as a footnote, I think it is a mistake to appoint academics to the high court because they have so little practical experience. Their existence is comprised of niggling argumentation. (Makes me nuts) Look at who dissented the loudest—Thomas. Not an academic. He alone truly understands the practical aspects of a corrupt election.]
Ok. Here’s what I think was Trump’s aim was with respect to all his judicial appointments: to end judicial activism and social engineering. Read: Roe v. Wade and other csses.
Yes, the judiciary is somewhat connected to Q’s messaging. But the judiciary is NOT the driver. The Q story is political. The courts should not ever be political by design of the founders. Trump was trying to move the entire judiciary back to the founding principles so as to undo many years of judicial activism. I think this part of the story is still inconclusive but even in the 9th Circuit huge positive change has happened.
Finally, I think that we make a mistake of thinking we have any idea whatsoever how this movie ends. I was stunned that Trump was not inaugurated. But looking back I am starting to think the Great Awakening hasn’t yet happened—it’s only started.
So in conclusion, I’m not surprised the SCOTUS kicked the can (but I’m with Thomas and think it was wrong to not hear the cases. I think that Kavanaugh and Barrett were put there for non-political purposes. (I think they might also be afraid of being Trump sycophants which would make them cowards if so, but we have no way of knowing that.)
The SCOTUS decisions today are going to be looked on as irrelevant after all is said and done. So, everyone, don’t be discouraged. The military is the main actor.
~~~~~~~~~
All good points and interesting viewpoint. I don't have your legal background or reasoning but I have had the sense that the SCOTUS was never the key player ("The military is the only way") if for no other reason that the Deep State would not simply accept court rulings and slink away defeated.
With Lin Woods comment at the start of our thread, Lin seems to be getting at the functional flaws in how the SCOTUS operates. In CA the courts took over wokeness and CA's AG formed a coalition with other corrupt states' AG's to drive/control legal wokeness and create new rights for themselves etc.
I don't see how the republic can be restored with courts like SCOTUS and CA and the "coalition" actively manipulating the law to serve their political purposes. It's amazing how far gone the country really was. Prayers continuing - may God continue to bless our country with those willing to fight the darkness, and grant us swift victory.
That's what I was thinking. Sure hope so.
in the meantime, folks, stop cooperating with our leftist culture....find ways.....
So in conclusion, I’m not surprised the SCOTUS kicked the can...
Since you’re a lawyer can I ask a legal/historical question?
The Court in Scott v Sandford also kicked the can, but didn’t that decision really cause much more division than if they had ruled more assertively?
Any potential that history may repeat to an extent?
..........
I thought they were not going to give their "opinion" until Thursday. Is there something else in the works?
“Our entire government is corrupt. “
I find this is a good point to red pill. The beauty is, you don’t have to be a rep-ugly-can’t, you don’t have to be a “conservative”. You can stick it to the republicans as hard as you like. You can laugh along with them when they roast Ted Cruz. And then you can casually point out that they are both dirty to the bone and how the pubs ENABLE the crats to drag us down the road.
You don’t have to be any of those things to NOT WANT TO BE A FREAKING LITERAL COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP!!! This is why until 1968 we were happy country. Now we not happy country. Time for them to go the way of the Soviets.
Saw a pull quote today “the democrats’ definition of democracy is a government dominated by democrats.”
It HAS to be the military. The only thing left is them or the worse case scenario - Plan Z.
This is what I always keep coming back to. No way he throws us and his family to the wolves. No way.
Well said.
Nothing can stop what is coming.
Roberts, Kavanaugh and ACB were the attorneys for Bush in Bush v. Gore ... [and] ... are Bush approved ...
_______________________________________________________
You may be right. Have they posted the actual opinion of the majority so we can try to understand their reasoning?
I ask because if the Secretaries of State were knowingly in collusion with foreign actors to commit election fraud, wouldn’t that make them enemy combatants? Has the USSC refused to hear the cases because they’re more appropriately handled under military law than constitutional law?
Grasping at straws is easier for me than admitting that two of PDJT’s three SC picks (K and C-B) are already outing themselves as derps and the third hasn’t been completely solid (G).
If President Trump doesn’t do something drastic to expose and punish the treason or sedition, or whatever it is, it will never end. He will lose everything. He will lose more than we will. He’s too calm. I don’t see him letting the major players like Gen. Flynn and Mike Lindell be taken down. I’m thinking a quiet Trump is a very dangerous Trump.
.Ignored Climate Change’
.......
Schumer, you slimey POS, they did not ignore climate change. They foolishly listened to you when you prompted “Global Warming”.
You are being invited to Texas when they finish recovering (without your help) to a celebratory shindig as the honored guest called a necktie party.
Nothing can stop what is coming.
Military tribunals will be sorting it all out.
Ever faithful Thomas. I love that man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.