First of all I do not think that the Great Awakening hinges on anything SCOTUS does.
Second, historically SCOTUS will take the most narrow view possible in any matter. This means given half a chance the court will slither out of taking a stand.
[Also, as a footnote, I think it is a mistake to appoint academics to the high court because they have so little practical experience. Their existence is comprised of niggling argumentation. (Makes me nuts) Look at who dissented the loudest—Thomas. Not an academic. He alone truly understands the practical aspects of a corrupt election.]
Ok. Here’s what I think was Trump’s aim was with respect to all his judicial appointments: to end judicial activism and social engineering. Read: Roe v. Wade and other csses.
Yes, the judiciary is somewhat connected to Q’s messaging. But the judiciary is NOT the driver. The Q story is political. The courts should not ever be political by design of the founders. Trump was trying to move the entire judiciary back to the founding principles so as to undo many years of judicial activism. I think this part of the story is still inconclusive but even in the 9th Circuit huge positive change has happened.
Finally, I think that we make a mistake of thinking we have any idea whatsoever how this movie ends. I was stunned that Trump was not inaugurated. But looking back I am starting to think the Great Awakening hasn’t yet happened—it’s only started.
So in conclusion, I’m not surprised the SCOTUS kicked the can (but I’m with Thomas and think it was wrong to not hear the cases. I think that Kavanaugh and Barrett were put there for non-political purposes. (I think they might also be afraid of being Trump sycophants which would make them cowards if so, but we have no way of knowing that.)
The SCOTUS decisions today are going to be looked on as irrelevant after all is said and done. So, everyone, don’t be discouraged. The military is the main actor.
~~~~~~~~~
All good points and interesting viewpoint. I don't have your legal background or reasoning but I have had the sense that the SCOTUS was never the key player ("The military is the only way") if for no other reason that the Deep State would not simply accept court rulings and slink away defeated.
With Lin Woods comment at the start of our thread, Lin seems to be getting at the functional flaws in how the SCOTUS operates. In CA the courts took over wokeness and CA's AG formed a coalition with other corrupt states' AG's to drive/control legal wokeness and create new rights for themselves etc.
I don't see how the republic can be restored with courts like SCOTUS and CA and the "coalition" actively manipulating the law to serve their political purposes. It's amazing how far gone the country really was. Prayers continuing - may God continue to bless our country with those willing to fight the darkness, and grant us swift victory.
.................
I don't understand how the military can take over if not given constitutional coverage. Nobody seems to have the cahoonas, military included.
One big problem with SCOTUS is that they have the discretion to pick and choose which cases to hear (or not hear) on appeal.
Sometimes this can be a good thing, because it would be better for SCOTUS to not hear a case than to set a bad legal precedent.
“ I have had the sense that the SCOTUS was never the key player
Agree.
It is looking like the Myanmar solution my be the remaining thread that holds the republic together.
Thanks for all your efforts on this Q thread, Ransomnote. You are doing a great service for all of us and the entire Free Republic community by keeping it going. We know it requires a lot of work and dedication on your part.
Amen and Amen!