I don’t believe the poor kid’s testimony is admissible in court. The murderer cannot face his accuser.
Too bad.
Dying declarations can be admitted.
i’m sure it is admissable
deathbed confessions are evidence
dying people do not die for lies they know are lies
in any case the dying persons statement will prompt an investigation that will find alibi problems and lead to other evidence
“don’t believe the poor kid’s testimony is admissible in court. The murderer cannot face his accuser.
Too bad.”
**********************************************
Dying declarations are admissible in court.
dying declaration
“I don’t believe the poor kid’s testimony is admissible in court. The murderer cannot face his accuser.”
The consistent use of apostrophes in the family’s names is something of a tell.
Dying declarations (aka deathbed declarations) are generally admissible if the person was a witness to their own murder and would otherwise have been considered a credible witness.
I don’t believe the poor kid’s testimony is admissible in court. The murderer.
....
Dying declarations are admissible in court.
The kid’s testimony is admissible but now that they know who did it I am sure they’ll find plenty of evidence.
Death bed confessions and witness statements are generally admissible.
General rule
1) Death is imminent or the declarent believes it to be so
2) The declaration refers to the cause or circumstances surrounding the impending death 3) The declaration concerns facts that the declarent would be competent to testify about. 4) The declaration is used in a proceeding concerning the declarent's death.
Details may vary by jurisdiction, be sure to review local evidentiary rules before making a dying declaration.
Dying words are admissable.
>>>I don’t believe the poor kid’s testimony is admissible in court. The murderer cannot face his accuser.<<<
If dead people can Vote, they should be able to ID a Killer.’
I’m sure the Boy’s IDing the killer isn’t the only Evidence being used against the SOB.
I don’t believe the poor kid’s testimony is admissible in court. The murderer cannot face his accuser.
Actually in most jurisdictions a dying declaration is admissible over a heresay objection.
Considered a “dying declaration” and is admissable.
The Dying Declaration IS admissible in court but subject to some rules. Some states freely allow Dying Declarations while some are more stringent about their admissibility.
The kid stated the accused shot him and the wounds led to his death. This covers the DD and makes it admissible.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/dying_declaration#:~:text=A%20dying%20declaration%20is%20a%20type%20of%20hearsay.,in%20civil%20law%20cases%20and%20criminal%20law%20cases.
Since all witnesses are deceased the State/City/County filing the charges now becomes the accuser. The defendant may certainly face his accuser in the form of the State/City/County.
The accused can cross-examine any official presented by the State for testimony at trial. Cross-examination rule also applies to any expert or person testifying at the request of the State.
Sixth Amendment satisfied.
**I am NOT a lawyer, have never portrayed one on television nor have I ever stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.
Not true.
This information is just not. that. hard. to. find.
Evidence: Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable
MN Court Rules 804 (b)(2): "Statement under belief of impending death. In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, a statement made by a declarant while believing that the declarant's death was imminent, concerning the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be impending death."
Or is that just TV bullshyte?