|
Posted on 12/30/2020 1:43:29 AM PST by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Er, resurrection, not restriction.
I had to go look at the picture-video of the Bushes. The look on their faces changes drastically and I sure would like to know what they saw. Your homepage is a wealth of info. Thank you for all your hard work!
Happy New Year to all!
The federal judge who on Monday blocked two Georgia counties from removing voters from voter rolls eased her order just before midnight Wednesday.
District Court Judge Leslie Abrams Gardner, an Obama appointee, ruled that Ben Hill County still cannot remove any voters from voter rolls but said the Muscogee County Board of Elections and Registration can remove voters if they do not rely solely on the U.S. Postal Service’s National Change of Address system.
The board must allow voters whose eligibility has been challenged to cast a provisional ballot in the Jan. 5, 2021, runoff elections. They also must advise the voter of specific evidence of ineligibility by phone and in writing by Jan. 6, and advise the voter of their right to be heard and present evidence in response to the findings.
The new order dissolved Gardner’s earlier temporary restraining order. It came after the court held a hearing Wednesday.
Ben Hill County Board of Elections members and Supervisor Cindi Dunlap had filed a motion arguing there is no evidence that the county’s actions “were taken in bad faith or with partisan interest.” County officials noted that any elector, or voter, may challenge the right of another elector under state law, and if the challenge meets procedural requirements, the board must “immediately consider such challenge and determine whether probable cause exists to sustain such challenge.”
The county argued that plaintiffs did not meet their burden of proving they’re likely to succeed in the suit. Muscogee officials in a separate document said the temporary restraining order “was erroneously issued based on an incomplete record.” Officials said they had not removed any voters from the voter rolls and will not do so.
“No ballot of any of the challenged ballots will be rejected unless the Board finds clear and convincing evidence that the ballot was not cast by a Georgia resident,” they wrote.
The lawsuit was brought by nonprofit Majority Forward. According to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, the nonprofit is an arm of a political action committee that received $2.5 million from Fair Fight, a voter rights group headed by former gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams. Abrams, a Democrat, is Judge Gardner’s sister.
Muscogee officials asked Gardner to recuse herself, but the judge refused. In a new Dec. 31 document, the judge said she took an oath before becoming a federal judge. She said a recusal “would be a dereliction of duty and a violation of my oath.” She argued that Fair Fight is not a party to the lawsuit. She then alleged there is “no legitimate reason” for her to recuse.
Wood made a matter of fact statement regarding ‘Epstein being alive’. It didn’t appear as a question to me.
So, on that note ... does anyone have an opinion on this? It’s quite a bold thing to say for the world to read.
@RudyGiuliani 3h
https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1344712734739468289
In a country with a free press, you would know:
1. The Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee issued a report demonstrating the vote was stolen from Donald Trump
.
2. The vote was unanimous and BIPARTISAN to audit Fulton County’s Absentee ballots.
3. And to de-certify Biden.
Lucian Lincoln “Lin” Wood Jr.
I have Perry on the list as firm. The source is “The Hill”, so who knows for sure, but I went ahead and logged him as confirmed.
It’s cool, it got caught quick. I had seen the second twit, just forgot the change in language.
Now, did —that— info come out in the hearing?
Steve Van Doorn wrote:
“Jovan Hutton Pulitzer says, China has a two way connection with our voting machines in through out Georgia
Device name in China
C2:D2:F3:1B:D1:9B (Other lettering I can’t be type)
Hidden Network Hui Zhou Gaoshengda Technology 75” TCL Roku TV Thu 12:48 pm
The device being used to take in all the data is a 75 inch Cheap Chinese Smart TV WiFi (two way communication)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuQXzxFvkHw
“
wastedyears wrote:
“If you look at the uncovered body being wheeled out of the prison (does that make much sense?), it doesn’t look like Epstein. He’s probably in real protective custody, not some half-arsed effort by the FIB.”
Agreed. If you really look at that photo you can see it more closely resembles Hugh Rodham, Hillary’s brother that had just recently “passed”.
The Boss, trolling Hillary. He knew she would see it.
Epstein didn’t kill himself!
Lucian Lincoln “Lin” Wood Jr.
Wood already won/settled 2 or 3 if not all the Sandmann stuff. That kid is close to a billionaire now...
ThankQ !!
numberonepal wrote:
This was posted on the boards on the 29th. I thought it was hopium at the time. However, today Patrick Byrne tweeted this post.
pic.twitter.com/vEhHxYSJGW— Patrick Byrne (@PatrickByrne) December 31, 2020
“
Links:
https://twitter.com/PatrickByrne/status/1344637313448632325?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Our situations mirrored each other almost to the day. I also report for my first day on Monday.
No biggie
he seems to be playing against himself.
Arizona’s attorney general on Wednesday said the state legislature has the authority to issue subpoenas regarding the administration of elections.
Attorney General Mark Brnovich sided with state lawmakers who are trying to compel Maricopa County election officials to produce material from the Nov. 3 election, including scans of mail-in ballots and images from voting machines.
“The Arizona Legislature has broad power to issue subpoenas regarding election administration in connection with the 2020 general election, both to review how the county discharged its duties during that election and to craft future election legislation. Any argument by the county otherwise should fail,” Brnovich, a Republican, said in a court filing.
Brnovich weighed in on an ongoing case, Maricopa County v. Fann, in the Maricopa County Superior Court.
State lawmakers issued subpoenas to the county’s Board of Supervisors earlier this month, calling for a scanned ballot audit and a forensic audit of ballot tabulation equipment and software. But the board voted against complying with the subpoenas, instead seeking judgment from a court about whether they have to comply. Arizona senators then filed a countersuit, asking the court to enforce the subpoenas, which was dismissed.
County officials alleged the subpoenas were “far in excess” of the state legislature’s power. “The subpoenas are unlawful,” the county said in its lawsuit.
Brnovich said that’s not correct, pointing to how the U.S. Constitution gives power to each state legislature to set the times, places, and manner of holding elections and the power to decide how electors for president of the United States will be chosen. He also noted Arizona’s constitution grants the legislature power to enact “laws to secure the purity of elections and guard against abuses of the elective franchise.”
“The Arizona Legislature should be permitted to issue subpoenas to determine whether government officials who have been delegated authority to administer elections have faithfully discharged those duties and to determine whether current law regarding election administration should remain the same or be amended,” Brnovich wrote.
“The Arizona Legislature has the power to keep election laws the same or to change those laws, and the court should recognize that the Arizona Legislature has the authority to issue subpoenas to obtain information to help it choose the best path forward for Arizona.”
A county spokesman told The Epoch Times via email that the county’s legal team will respond to the brief in court on Monday. Clint Hickman, chairman of the board, told the Arizona Republic that the attorney general’s brief didn’t address whether lawmakers can issue subpoenas in a bid to overturn election results.
“What is at issue in the court is whether a legislative subpoena is the proper constitutional mechanism for the state Senate to take custody of the voting machines and voter database and millions of ballots for purpose of determining whether it wants to throw out the Nov. 3, 2020 election results and impose their preferred slate of presidential electors,” Hickman said. “Unfortunately, the brief declined to address that issue.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/arizona-attorney-general-says-legislature-has-authority-to-order-election-audit_3639128.html?v=ul
Sauce?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
