Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-815.html
1 posted on 12/17/2020 9:05:12 AM PST by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: proust

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-815.html


2 posted on 12/17/2020 9:05:24 AM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Which MI one is this? Which assertions?
A summary would be helpful.


3 posted on 12/17/2020 9:07:23 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

When will they be hearing this case?


5 posted on 12/17/2020 9:09:04 AM PST by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

We already knew this... whats the update?

We have a date yet?


6 posted on 12/17/2020 9:09:09 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Gretchen and company should be arrested.


8 posted on 12/17/2020 9:10:11 AM PST by madison10 (Maranatha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust
3bit1f

I can't see how this is going to change anything.

9 posted on 12/17/2020 9:10:17 AM PST by The Louiswu (Dylan is right once more...”The times, they are a changing”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

I give it three seconds before Roberts tosses it... Bets anyone? Constitution? We don’t need no stink’n constitution! 😡


11 posted on 12/17/2020 9:12:06 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

This means absolutely NOTHING.

All it means is that they managed to file the paperwork correctly.


12 posted on 12/17/2020 9:12:47 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

This Writ will most likely be unceremoniously tossed. Lack of Standing, wrong Plaintiffs. Which is correct and in accordance with legal principles.

Attorneys that do not pay attention to prior court decisions and forge ahead despite the clear instruction of the court are pretty much committing malpractice and can get sanctioned.

In the Texas decision the SCOTUS made it very clear - the only persons that are actually damaged by what went on are the STATE LEGISLATURES because their constitutional rights were the ones violated, not your’s, not PDJT’s and not voter’s.


13 posted on 12/17/2020 9:13:19 AM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

You can’t summarily dismiss it if it isn’t docketed first.


19 posted on 12/17/2020 9:18:30 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Well, the Texas case was “on the docket” also, as was the Pennsylvania case. In fact they ever asked for arguments & briefs in the Texas case, then just threw it out. So being on the docket doesn’t really mean anything.


23 posted on 12/17/2020 9:21:45 AM PST by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust
If anything were to happen to Roberts, or if he recused himself (can he even do that?), would PDJT get to appoint his successor or substitute? Would that nomination need to be voted on by Congress or can the President use emergency powers to seat any successor Chief Justice? Does anyone know how that works?

This case has got to be divisive and schismatic in the extreme for the Court. Any number of crises could develop, knowing as we do who the malevolent actors in all of this have been and continue to be, including a highly politicized and thus dangerous intelligence community.

27 posted on 12/17/2020 9:24:52 AM PST by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Kraken = People on Krak


35 posted on 12/17/2020 9:30:58 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

This case might provoke riots and as we all know Roberts doesn’t want riot encouraging cases.......


36 posted on 12/17/2020 9:31:04 AM PST by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

I will believe it when I see it...and will thank God if it happens.


39 posted on 12/17/2020 9:34:30 AM PST by sevinufnine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

WHAT IF TRUMP STATES ON JANUARY 20, 2021:

“THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FRAUD INVESTIGATION WILL CONTINUE AND IS NOT STOPPING UNTIL EVIDENCE OF FRAUD IS COMPLETELY REVEALED, FOUND AND UNCOVERED.”


61 posted on 12/17/2020 9:47:09 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

64 posted on 12/17/2020 9:49:41 AM PST by tflabo (Truth or tyranny )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

IANAL - I Am Not A Lawyer. But I read the filing available at the link given. But there is no ‘Kraken’ in it. ‘Kraken’ is a software suite for tracking internet packets and the servers and users where they are initiated and transferred (’IP’), and contain device identification of the origination of a transaction (’MAC’). The capture of the server in Frankfurt, Germany (allegedly defended by Gina Haspel and a CIA ‘officer’) resulted in 5 deaths. This was not in the filed brief. There was no mention of matching MACs to GA voting machines found on the German server in the brief.

And I didn’t find a request for action. That’s fine, because all the courts (including SCOTUS) can rule on is whether a state election was UNLAWFUL according to its election laws. But the brief treated only seemed to treat the cheats on individual state basis, with no mention of matching the MACs in GA to vote packets in Germany.

The real Kraken will involve military tribunals. The sooner the perps are in GITMO, the better. So let’s get ‘Kraken’!


68 posted on 12/17/2020 9:56:53 AM PST by RideForever (We were born to be tested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

All the other cases were docketed too, but were rejected for hearings. How do we know they won’t do the same thing with her, and claim she has no standing with the court?


78 posted on 12/17/2020 10:23:35 AM PST by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

The response from the Michigan Gov is not required until Jan 14, 2021. This means that the court is slowing walking justice to as to run out the clock.


93 posted on 12/17/2020 11:07:19 AM PST by Kirk and Scottie ( https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/dr-shiva-presents-data-arizona-hearing-completely-oblitera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson