Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powell "Kraken" MI case docketed on SCOTUS
SCOTUS ^ | 12/17/2020 | SCOTUS

Posted on 12/17/2020 9:05:12 AM PST by proust

It's on!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clownlawyer; lol; meaningless; meansnothing; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-815.html
1 posted on 12/17/2020 9:05:12 AM PST by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: proust

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-815.html


2 posted on 12/17/2020 9:05:24 AM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Which MI one is this? Which assertions?
A summary would be helpful.


3 posted on 12/17/2020 9:07:23 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Three cowards got the message.


4 posted on 12/17/2020 9:08:33 AM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proust

When will they be hearing this case?


5 posted on 12/17/2020 9:09:04 AM PST by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

We already knew this... whats the update?

We have a date yet?


6 posted on 12/17/2020 9:09:09 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton

The fact that the one Michigan county they were able to examine Dominion machines show they were adjudicating vast quantities of votes and shifting numbers from Trump to Biden.


7 posted on 12/17/2020 9:09:31 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proust

Gretchen and company should be arrested.


8 posted on 12/17/2020 9:10:11 AM PST by madison10 (Maranatha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust
3bit1f

I can't see how this is going to change anything.

9 posted on 12/17/2020 9:10:17 AM PST by The Louiswu (Dylan is right once more...”The times, they are a changing”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Where was it posted? I checked as best I could.


10 posted on 12/17/2020 9:10:17 AM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: proust

I give it three seconds before Roberts tosses it... Bets anyone? Constitution? We don’t need no stink’n constitution! 😡


11 posted on 12/17/2020 9:12:06 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

This means absolutely NOTHING.

All it means is that they managed to file the paperwork correctly.


12 posted on 12/17/2020 9:12:47 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

This Writ will most likely be unceremoniously tossed. Lack of Standing, wrong Plaintiffs. Which is correct and in accordance with legal principles.

Attorneys that do not pay attention to prior court decisions and forge ahead despite the clear instruction of the court are pretty much committing malpractice and can get sanctioned.

In the Texas decision the SCOTUS made it very clear - the only persons that are actually damaged by what went on are the STATE LEGISLATURES because their constitutional rights were the ones violated, not your’s, not PDJT’s and not voter’s.


13 posted on 12/17/2020 9:13:19 AM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

may have been the GA case i was thinking of.

Nothing is really new to me at this point until SCOTUS hears something that has standing.


14 posted on 12/17/2020 9:14:17 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Breaking! A pro-Trump lawyer FILED THE PAPERWORK CORRECTLY!


15 posted on 12/17/2020 9:15:20 AM PST by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Response of the Defendants is not due until 1/14/21, so looks like a non-starter to me.


16 posted on 12/17/2020 9:17:14 AM PST by Stormy_MS1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu

“I can’t see how this is going to change anything.”

It doesn’t.


17 posted on 12/17/2020 9:17:21 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

Wouldn’t it actually be Constitutional to toss this out if the plaintiff has no standing per statutory interpretations?


18 posted on 12/17/2020 9:17:55 AM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: proust

You can’t summarily dismiss it if it isn’t docketed first.


19 posted on 12/17/2020 9:18:30 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

It means a lot. It means that if the sc refuses to hear it, they are worthless corrupt deep state lackies and our republic is gone unless.


20 posted on 12/17/2020 9:18:51 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson