Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powell "Kraken" MI case docketed on SCOTUS
SCOTUS ^ | 12/17/2020 | SCOTUS

Posted on 12/17/2020 9:05:12 AM PST by proust

It's on!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clownlawyer; lol; meaningless; meansnothing; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

I must not have formatted the post properly because this story was quickly dumped in the Chat section. A “Better Homes and Gardens” article has been in the News section for the past 2 hours.


21 posted on 12/17/2020 9:19:14 AM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Stormy_MS1

Yep, sounds like a punt. Trump has to get the evidence on the record, either judicial or legislative, before 1/6


22 posted on 12/17/2020 9:20:49 AM PST by joshua c (President Elect joshua_c. Hey if Joe can do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: proust

Well, the Texas case was “on the docket” also, as was the Pennsylvania case. In fact they ever asked for arguments & briefs in the Texas case, then just threw it out. So being on the docket doesn’t really mean anything.


23 posted on 12/17/2020 9:21:45 AM PST by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace
When will they be hearing this case?

My prediction would be never.

24 posted on 12/17/2020 9:21:46 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jpp113
Lack of Standing, wrong Plaintiffs.

More likely lack of jurisdiction. Powell went right to the Supreme Court with this one and the court has appellate jurisdiction over these matters rather than original jurisdiction.

25 posted on 12/17/2020 9:23:12 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

This means absolutely NOTHING.

*************

Yep, meaningless really. It will probably be dismissed because of “lack of standing” or some other judicial excuse.


26 posted on 12/17/2020 9:24:31 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: proust
If anything were to happen to Roberts, or if he recused himself (can he even do that?), would PDJT get to appoint his successor or substitute? Would that nomination need to be voted on by Congress or can the President use emergency powers to seat any successor Chief Justice? Does anyone know how that works?

This case has got to be divisive and schismatic in the extreme for the Court. Any number of crises could develop, knowing as we do who the malevolent actors in all of this have been and continue to be, including a highly politicized and thus dangerous intelligence community.

27 posted on 12/17/2020 9:24:52 AM PST by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

Easy to fob off a rejection to the SC being cowards.

The Texas case served its purpose. It alerted the SCs and the entire country that knowledge of Electoral Fraud was widely known and recognized by Attornies general in the filing states.

Perhaps this case presents in ways that are more relevant to the question of Electoral Fraud. We will see.


28 posted on 12/17/2020 9:26:32 AM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
"It means that if the sc refuses to hear it, they are worthless corrupt deep state lackies..."


29 posted on 12/17/2020 9:26:48 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

7-2 dismissal coming in 3...2...1...

Alito and Thomas will vote to hear it. The others will squash it.


30 posted on 12/17/2020 9:27:55 AM PST by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

One would think that Trump would qualify for original jurisdiction. Perhaps he would intervene.


31 posted on 12/17/2020 9:28:11 AM PST by j_guru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: antonico

The reply from the defraudor states was petulant and childish. It exposed them as whiney frauds. Lets see what happens here.


32 posted on 12/17/2020 9:28:42 AM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

stupid fricking constitution, insisting people have standing before they sue.


33 posted on 12/17/2020 9:29:50 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jpp113

This Writ will most likely be unceremoniously tossed.

***************

If Democrats were the aggrieved party it probably would be treated differently. Just saying.


34 posted on 12/17/2020 9:30:13 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: proust

Kraken = People on Krak


35 posted on 12/17/2020 9:30:58 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

This case might provoke riots and as we all know Roberts doesn’t want riot encouraging cases.......


36 posted on 12/17/2020 9:31:04 AM PST by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu

Prayer is the only hope for America


37 posted on 12/17/2020 9:32:12 AM PST by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch (Clean out the DOJ, CIA & FBI, top-to-bottom, Haspel & Wray first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

We don’t know yet. We highly suspect,but how they handle the corruption in the electionwill forever seal the deal. Lets wait till we see how they react. I’m giving them one last chance a nice to restore my faith in justice. He’ll, we’ve got nothing to lose waiting a little longer,and ev r thing to gain IF they come through for our side. Doubtful at this point,but we’ll see


38 posted on 12/17/2020 9:32:55 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: proust

I will believe it when I see it...and will thank God if it happens.


39 posted on 12/17/2020 9:34:30 AM PST by sevinufnine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Powell went through local courts in GA, she didn’t go straight to SCOTUS


40 posted on 12/17/2020 9:34:33 AM PST by LilFarmer ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson