Wisconsin?
Nothing to see here.
No Crime(s).
Dismissed.
Posted on 12/10/2020 5:55:08 PM PST by ransomnote
Posted by Q 3 years ago tomorrow:
Q has asked about ownership of voting machines before. They knew GS was going to mess with the numbers. This was the plan.
A VERY SPECIAL PLACE!!
What would be the penalty for stealing elections?
Post #339
I can’t follow that it makes my head hurt, and I’ve been up for 36 hrs. so I’m not thinking too straight right now.
So , then. What kind of in-law is that guy? Or is he no in-law at all. I thought everybody kin to your spouse was some kinda in-law. Just put in-law in front of their title.
I musta been bamboozled my whole life, I guess.
*****************************************************************************
Like I told that other person, our family only had 2 types - in-laws and out-laws. All relatives were in.
Sidney filed AZ case!
“ I welcome our Canadian brother and sisters to the United States of America!”
Works for this Calgarian.
________________________________________________________
And this Ontarian.
China thinks they “needs” the Midwest breadbasket for themselves.
they aren’t about to nuke it
Who/what is GS?
The swamp is bipartisan and the bureaucrats are unipartyand ingrained with self-preservation, so we need to globally drain the swamp and not care if both red and blue swamp creatures are exterminated. No tears will be shed!
Did they even get to present any evidence on this case? Which lawyer filed it? Was it really the Trump Campaign or POTUS, or was it one of the other numerous suits?
George Soros.
All those other people are “extended family,” or as some like to say, “out-laws.”
The first 20 minutes is pure entertainment. JHP talks about his dot-commed billion-dollar startup, his involvement with "Oak Island" on the History Channel, his development and patenting of the now-standard mechanism for feeding rabbits kibble, and his Napoleon Hill-style belief in "what you can conceive, you can achieve".
Then the topic switches to the election. Immediately, he confirms that every aspect of the massive 2020 election fraud can be verified, and then goes on to detail the political problems in actually doing that.
I'm now listening in the background.
Yes, your husband’s brothers are your brothers-in-law. But we were talking about a brother-in-law’s brother, which can only happen with the person married to your sister. So, the brother of your sister’s husband is just “extended family.”
Yes it does. GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)
How big a bunker do you need to hold 50,000 people.
Disputable, since chinese are smaller than westerners. If they were there with their logistics to sustain them, it would have to be pretty big. But 30k of HE would eradicate the population of any enclosed space because of the overpressure. I still think the story is bs, but it is a happy thought. The F-16 that we know of supposedly crashed in MI. It wouldn't nor couldn't have carried that bomb neither does a unit of 50k chinese carry a missile capable of downing a fighter from 1100 miles.
I never wanted to listen to any of that music ever again after I read that.
A friend back in college was telling a story and he said something about his "aunt's husband." I stopped him and said, "Why don't you call him your uncle?"
He looked at me like I had just said there are 52 states and said, "No. An uncle is the brother of your mother or father."
I felt rather foolish at that moment and remind silent...vowing privately to continue calling all my aunt's husbands "uncle."
Good explanation.
I talk sometimes about my sister-in-law-in-law.
She married my wife’s brother. If my wife and I get divorced. They would still be in-laws, I would not.
To clarify, this is going to be statistical, which is
different from mathematical algorithmic evidence of my
previous post. What it shows is a phenomenon the author suggest
to be investigated. If you’ve been following the post,
you’ve already saw evidence that mathematicians can find
algorithm patterns in the data that shouldn’t be there,
Salomon for example - “The precincts seized more than once
were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving
the software takes the first available precinct from an
ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.”
Statistical Evidence of Dominion Election Fraud? Time to Audit the Machines.
https://fraudspotters.com/statistics-about-dominion-election-fraud/
Overview
Statistical analysis of past presidential races supports the view that in 2020, in counties where Dominion Machines were deployed, the voting outcomes were on average (nationwide) 1.5% higher for Joe Biden and 1.5% lower for Donald Trump after adjusting for other demographic and past voting preferences.
FAQ page about this analysis.
https://fraudspotters.com/dominion-effect-faq/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
