Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Epic, hugely successful first high-altitude test of Starship.
Twitter ^ | 12/09/20 | Eric Berger

Posted on 12/09/2020 3:19:25 PM PST by Moonman62

Epic, hugely successful first high-altitude test of Starship. The belly flop maneuver test of Starship's aerodynamics was especially impressive. So very much to build on here for the Starship program.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: aerospaceengineering; engineering; spacex; starship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Moonman62

Starship.

They built this city on Rock ‘n Roll!


21 posted on 12/09/2020 4:07:25 PM PST by Alas Babylon! ("You, the American people, are my only special interest." --President Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

THe Flaps are Freaking amazing. The Power they must have is astronomical.

Its like folding & unfolding an airliner wing in flight.


22 posted on 12/09/2020 4:08:18 PM PST by UNGN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

There’s a long shot showing the landing. The thing was darn near floating belly down. When it went vertical, it was coming down as stable as a F9, but when the engines went rich, it plummeted. Still, this was a massively successful test, and SN9 is in the hangar waiting for testing.


23 posted on 12/09/2020 4:15:50 PM PST by rarestia (Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Empire_of_Liberty

You are not alone.


24 posted on 12/09/2020 4:18:43 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

No. The prototypes have landing legs that deploy from within the ship. They have worked fine in the past. Couldn’t see that detail in this test due to the hard landing and subsequent explosion.


25 posted on 12/09/2020 4:21:49 PM PST by ocrp1982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Yes. The aspect that was the primary point of interest was the flaps controlling the ship as it guided the ship during descent and then oriented for the ship for a landing on the pad. That portion performed extremely well. The only failure was two early s/n engines.


26 posted on 12/09/2020 4:25:02 PM PST by ocrp1982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Back to the drawing board.


27 posted on 12/09/2020 4:26:11 PM PST by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Didn’t quite stick the landing, though. LOL


28 posted on 12/09/2020 4:40:41 PM PST by Viking2002 (When aliens fly past Earth, they probably lock their doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ocrp1982

I understand that Musk tweeted that the two engines shut down in sequence early, due to the FAA asking for a lower altitude flight. 12.5K vice 15K. Musk also said that they lacked pressure in the header tanks for landing.


29 posted on 12/09/2020 4:45:02 PM PST by 75thOVI (Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

95% successful won’t get us to Mars and back. Everyone is cheering this like it was some kind of major space flight breakthrough, but it exploded after fuel issues.

Not the greatest example of success.


30 posted on 12/09/2020 4:50:27 PM PST by This_Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt

Very cool. Will be something to see the full stack on the super heavy booster.

...

I think we’ll see it before next Summer. The first booster is under construction.


31 posted on 12/09/2020 4:52:34 PM PST by Moonman62 (http://www.freerepublic.com/~moonman62/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI

I haven’t seen that tweet. However, that doesn’t change the fact that engine s/n 32 did not reignite for the landing and s/n 36 sputtered during reignition for landing. Only s/n 42 performed well.
Prototype 9 will use engines with more development time so it should stick the landing without exploding due to a hard landing.


32 posted on 12/09/2020 4:58:29 PM PST by ocrp1982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I can’t believe how many arrogant, Dunning Kruger suffering, armchair assholes there are here. Truly embarrassed for Free Republic.

The shutdown and reignition of individual engines is used to control thrust. They’re not all supposed to turn on and off at the same time.

There was a problem with propellent supply from the header tanks during the landing burn — as per Elon Musk Tweet.


33 posted on 12/09/2020 5:18:11 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

And the maneuver is called? that’s right a crazy Elon!


34 posted on 12/09/2020 5:24:01 PM PST by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

Another Tweet from Musk:

SN8 did great! Even reaching apogee would’ve been great, so controlling all way to putting the crater in the right spot was epic!!


35 posted on 12/09/2020 6:01:13 PM PST by Moonman62 (http://www.freerepublic.com/~moonman62/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
I can’t believe how many arrogant, Dunning Kruger suffering, armchair assholes there are here. Truly embarrassed for Free Republic.

It was an amazing achievement, probably reached with less money and in less time than Boeing's capsule, which will take 9 months more just to disassemble to fix the problem they identified. Musk already has another Starship almost ready to go, and they know exactly what was wrong with this flight.

36 posted on 12/09/2020 6:01:39 PM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

LOL! “[A] little hard.” Accurate, but loses a little something in the telling.

(Epic, fireball explosion for those who didn’t see... but yes, the flight WAS a success.)


37 posted on 12/09/2020 6:04:28 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ocrp1982

Rapid Unplanned Disassembly Emergency. That’s just plain RUDE! Seriously, I love your jargon, RUD.


38 posted on 12/09/2020 6:05:42 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“Putting the crater in the right spot.”

Now, THAT is a salesman with a sense of humor!


39 posted on 12/09/2020 6:07:42 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

Dunning Kruger... amazing this has no etymological relation to finishing the last of the coffee.


40 posted on 12/09/2020 6:09:24 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson