Posted on 12/06/2020 8:48:32 AM PST by weston
It was an announced virtual show.
Yes- it was in Seattle, but in full and fair disclosure it was advertised locally as a virtual event.
Online comments are possibly being framed in such a way as to make it seem as if it was an actual event that took place outside and physically involved the Space Needle.
Perhaps- it’s not too much of a stretch of the imagination for laser technology to eventually catch up to what was exclusively a virtual event on New Years Eve?
The Truman Show... 1984... add your own scenario... are we there yet?
The other thing that is interesting to me is Dwight Brower as the recipient. He is the same person that announced the water main break as well as the person who fired the two whistleblowers in Fulton County.
I hope someone is looking into this guy...
If Biden and his crooked family were offered immunity in exchange for admitting to the election fraud and conceding the election, that would be a neat and happy ending to all of this.
People knew it wasn’t real. It sure is beautiful though.
Quote: “A Festival Of Light who employed “sky-mapping technology and real video footage” that was layered with new digital artist expressions. The festivities were only viewable online and on TV as no attendees were allowed in the vicinity. If people did show up, they were likely disappointed to see that the tower was lit only in T-Mobile’s iconic magenta color—all of the breathtaking effects were added digitally upon transmission to screens around the country.”
https://liveforlivemusic.com/news/seattle-space-needle-new-years/
Judy, I think that will be offered to Joe, only because of his obvious dementia.
His team is going to play this out to the bitter end, but they will have to admit to conspiracy and crimes committed at some point.
If they go the riot route, from 1/7/21 on, the military will be used to restore order.
Look inside Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix
20 PHOTOS
11:00 a.m. EDT Sep. 28, 2020
********************
Ana Castaneda feeds ballots to the sorter on Sept. 22, 2020, at Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix. The facility prints Maricopa County’s ballots as well as ballots for many other states and counties.
***********************
Labels for election mail are seen on Sept. 22, 2020, at Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix. The facility prints Maricopa County’s ballots as well as ballots for many other states and counties.
**************************
Labels for election mail are seen on Sept. 22, 2020, at Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix. The facility prints Maricopa County’s ballots as well as ballots for many other states and counties.
*************************
Brian Mansfield prepares ballots to be mailed on Sept. 22, 2020, at Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix. The facility prints Maricopa County’s ballots as well as ballots for many other states and counties.
**************************
Brandon Sanchez sorts envelopes by ZIP code on Sept. 22, 2020, at Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix. The facility prints Maricopa County’s ballots as well as ballots for many other states and counties.
**************************
Jonathan Duncan holds cardboard boxes while preparing ballots to be mailed on Sept. 22, 2020, at Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix. The facility prints Maricopa County’s ballots as well as ballots for many other states and counties.
*********************************
Jonathan Duncan prepares ballots to be mailed on Sept. 22, 2020, at Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix.<<<<<<<< The facility prints Maricopa County’s ballots as well as ballots for many other states and counties.<<<<<<
Thanks, Maggie!!
Always follow the $$$ (contracts).
Happy New Year!
Good start!!
We need a BIGGER list!!
LinkedIn shows:
Information Systems Manager, US Army from Jan 1976-Feb 1996 (no separating rank listed)
Elections Coordinator, DeKalb County GA Mar 1996-Dec 2006
Still wish we could see those AT&T ‘contracts’.
Statements from Senators Lankford and Cruz on Facebook:
_____________________________________________________________
Senator James Lankford
46 mins ·
Millions of Americans, including thousands of Oklahomans, still have significant questions about the November 3 election process. We have reports of problems with voting machines, people voting twice, non-residents voting in a state, or people mysteriously voting after their death months or years before. In some states, there were problems with signature verification, different rules for mail-in ballots than in-person ballots, delayed receipt of ballots, inconsistent curing of ballots, a lack of meaningful access to the polls, or a questionable counting process for partisan poll watchers. Many of these questions have been reviewed by state leaders and courts, but questions still persist. These are not questions that exist in the dark corners of the internet, but ones I hear at the grocery store, the gas station, through text messages, and on phone calls.
For the sake of the nation’s unity, these questions should not be ignored.
Today, I am joining a group of Senators to propose an election commission, modeled on the commission formed in 1877, to resolve the electoral issues of the election of 1876 when three states, Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina, had reports of voter fraud. The 1877 commission comprised of five Senators, five members from the House, and five Supreme Court Justices quickly organized to evaluate the election and make a recommendation to provide the nation a way to resolve the issues before the inauguration. The commission we are proposing would be required to meet and complete their audit within 10 days, before the January 20 inauguration. The report of the commission would be submitted to the individual states so each state would still have the final say on their electors, which is the constitutional requirement.
This proposal is not designed to thwart the democratic process. It is designed to protect it. Everyone should see the division currently in the nation, and we all should have an interest in providing a path to resolution. People want answers to their questions.
If we can agree to form the electoral commission and submit its findings to the individual states, I am prepared to respect the final decision of the states. But, if we cannot agree to hear the concerns of millions of Americans, I am prepared to oppose the electors on January 6 since I cannot be certain that they were ‘regularly made,’ which is the statutory requirement.
Senators in 1969 and 2005 raised voter integrity issues during the January 6 Joint Session of Congress. They debated the issues that day, and in both cases, reforms were made to elections in the future. Even if other members are not willing to address the outstanding questions that persist in this election, we must begin a process of reform that will lead to greater election confidence in the future.
_________________________________________________________
Senator Ted Cruz
1 hr ·
America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.
When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.
The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.
Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.
And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).
Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.
But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.
Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.
On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.
At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.
The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.
In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.
We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.
Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.
We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.
These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.
.@Newsmax: Cruz Set to Lead Group of GOP Senators in Opposing Certification https://t.co/9f5j9Nxuar— Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) January 2, 2021
Our elite “betters” in the government, media, tech world, etc. ... the globalists.... want us to stay separated from each other and watch things on a screen. 1984, here we are.
Just think how much so many people’s health has deteriorated in the past year from staying indoors without exercising while eating food ordered online and delivered. Now people who are doing these things are being praised for “keeping us safe”. Before the C-virus, the USA was already the most obese developed nation in the world. Very sad.
Blackburn, Braun, Cruz, Hagerty, Inhofe, Johnson, Kennedy, Lankford, Lummis, Marshall, and Tuberville all backing Hawley.
I see a possibility of clear exposure of election fraud coming through solid investigations in the next few years but it will be too late.
@EmeraldRobinson
· 27m
The Right is now pressuring and protesting GOP leadership to defend President Trump.
Mitch McConnell & the GOP establishment have a real revolt to deal with now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
