Skip to comments.
DannyTN's summary of Sidney Powell's GA filing
Self ^
| 11/26/2020
| DannyTN
Posted on 11/26/2020 9:31:15 AM PST by DannyTN
The link leads to the full filing. The summary below is my own.
Here is my summary of the counts in Sidney's Georgia filing, I may have missed some. Especially count 5 where I stopped after a lot seemed repetitive. I also did not try to capture all of the estimated counts in the filing. The request for relief at the end was not summarized and posted verbatum.
Count 1 Defendents violated the Elections Clause and 42 U.S.C Rule changes and cure procedures conflict with state legislation.
This count includes
- workers not following procedures when counting,
- mail-in ballots sent to people who had not requested them,
- votes from people who had moved out of state
Count 2 Denial of Equal Protection. Secretary of State and Georgia counties violated the 14th Amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
This count includes
- Opening ballots prior to election day in violation of legislative statute,
- improper procedures with lack of auditable logs,
- a large number of identical pristine ballots that were likely fraudulent,
- breach of chain of custody of voting machines the night before the election,
- failure to treat voters in all counties the same,
- the banning of observers,
- not allowing observers to review all envelopes,
- use of Dominion Democracy Suite software,
- workers switching votes from Trump to Biden,
- allowing ineligible ballots to be counted,
- use of Dominion software which allowed eligible ballots to be switched between candidates or lost altogether.
Count 3 Denial of Due Process 14th Amendment § 1983 Disparate treatment of Absentee/Mail-In Voters among different counties.
subjecting one class of voters to greater burdens or scrutiny than another.
Count 4 Denial of Due Process on the Right to Vote 14th Amendment Art 1 § 4, CL. 1; Art II § 1, Cl.2; Amend 16 U.S.C. § 1983.
This count includes all previous allegations,
- failure to count legal votes,
- failure to count votes free from distortion by illegal votes,
- failure to verify signatures,
- abnormally low signature rejection rate compared to states which have had mail-in voting for years.
Count 5 There was Wide-Spread Ballot Fraud OCGA 21-2-522
This count includes all previous paragraphs.
- Enough irregular ballots exist to put the election in doubt.
- Glitches in the Dominion system have uniform effect of hurting Trump and helping Biden.
- Fraudulent acts show votes being switched from Trump to Biden during the recount,
- lack of procedures to follow the election code,
- use of Dominion despite evidence of serious vulnerabilities,
- misrepresentations about a pipe burst that sent everyone home,
- while some poll workers remained and kept working on the machines,
- failure to maintain logs on the voting system for a genuine and sound audit,
- ballots received that were never requested,
- third parties voted an untold number of unlawfully acquired absentee or mail-in ballots,
- 20,311 voters had registered as having moved out of state,
- at least 96,600 mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast,
- 136,098 ballots were illegally counted as a result of improper manipulation of the Dominion software,
- mail in ballots were requested by 3rd parties or sent erroneously to persons and voted fraudulently,
- undetected by a failed system of signature verification
For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:
- 1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
- 2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
- 3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election; 101
- 4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
- 5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
- 6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
- 7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
- 8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
- 9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted; 102
- 10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects;
- 11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
- 12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
- 13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3.
- 14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: depositvanityfeenow; elections; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: Nathan _in_Arkansas
The blocking of observers was an OUTRIGHT FELONY, under the law. Using 'Covid' as cover, the poll officials kept observers beyond reasonable their ability to inspect/challenge ballots WHILE THE POLL WORKERS THEMSELVES WERE FREE TO WORK CLOSER TO ONE ANOTHER which renders their Covid cover excuse NULL AND VOID.
"EQUAL protection" (or whatever) violations, all easily proven in court because there's PLENTY of video.
41
posted on
11/26/2020 10:27:06 AM PST
by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: DannyTN
GREAT post and thread. Thank you DannyTN. Happy Thanksgiving.
42
posted on
11/26/2020 10:27:24 AM PST
by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: RummyChick
Why wonâÂÂt they survive standing if the plaintiffs are Trump electors?
43
posted on
11/26/2020 10:27:32 AM PST
by
nwrep
To: 4Liberty
😂😂😂😂
44
posted on
11/26/2020 10:30:21 AM PST
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: RummyChick
Her suits likely wont survive Standing issue but it is a nice summary. We'll see. She brought the Georgia suit on behalf of a number of Republican electors. They have lots of standing.
45
posted on
11/26/2020 10:33:13 AM PST
by
politicket
(Don't remove a Bernie Sanders bumper sticker. It's the only thing holding the car together!)
To: pepsi_junkie
That is why in a fight between conservatives and bolsheviks, conservatives ALWAYS lose (see Russian Revolution). Conservatives always fight with one hand tied behind their backs and like you said, “they’re scared cucks and they don’t want it on their consciences”.
Only NATIONALISTS/PATRIOTS have a fighting chance to defeat the bolsheviks (see South Korea’ Park Chung-Hee, Spain’s Franco, Chile’s Pinochet, USA’S Reagan and Trump).
To: DannyTN
13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3. THAT'S gonna leave a mark...
47
posted on
11/26/2020 10:35:23 AM PST
by
kiryandil
(Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
To: DannyTN
48
posted on
11/26/2020 10:40:57 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: DannyTN
On another site, someone mentioned the mysterious “water leak” that supposedly occurred in the arena where votes were being counted in Fulton County. The building was supposedly evacuated because of that, but someone claims that some Democrat operatives were allowed to remain inside, unsupervised. Anyone know the facts about this?
To: nwrep
Standing is a very complicated issue. I don’t go into the weeds on it.
If you go back to Trump’s first election you will see some electors suing. You will see courts that have different opinions on standing.
One case even had someone claim Trump kidnapped his son. I don’t think it was an elector who made that claim
Two cases got combined and went to SCOTUS
I think this fails on standing. It could be appealed and reversed...or not.
50
posted on
11/26/2020 10:48:07 AM PST
by
RummyChick
(I blame Kushner.)
To: pepsi_junkie
"Here's the reality: judges have good reason to fear that a ruling in favor of Trump will result in cities burning."
I hate to say it, but that non-legal reasoning may trump all of the legal issues. It sounds exactly the way Roberts would think, i.e.,: "These allegations, if true, would so upset our notions of fairness and democracy, would so likely lead to civil unrest if acted upon, that it would be dangerous to give them a hearing."
In other words, to prevent democracy from being subverted, we must allow it to be subverted with rank election fraud backed up by the threat of civil unrest.
To: Steve_Seattle
52
posted on
11/26/2020 10:52:42 AM PST
by
cgbg
( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
To: Steve_Seattle
If there is no rule of law, there is no rule of law.
Let the judges and justices ponder that for a while.
53
posted on
11/26/2020 10:53:42 AM PST
by
cgbg
( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
To: RummyChick
"Her suits likely wont survive Standing issue but it is a nice summary."
If the citizens of Georgia don't have "standing," who does? Who in your mind would have "standing"?
To: politicket
Standing is not as easy as you like to think. The magic word Elector doesn’t always mean you get standing in election issues...
See Nemanich v. Williams
I think this suit gets tossed in GA. I have no opinion as to what happens when it is appealed.
55
posted on
11/26/2020 10:58:05 AM PST
by
RummyChick
(I blame Kushner.)
To: cgbg
Thanks, concerning the alleged water leak. I remember hearing about it at the time, and thinking it sounded very suspicious.
To: Steve_Seattle
Wood is a Citizen voter in GA. His suit was tossed for lack of standing
And as I said..I don’t get into the weeds on standing.
I just say see you at the end.
There are cases on standing you can review if you wish to learn about the components..
57
posted on
11/26/2020 10:59:34 AM PST
by
RummyChick
(I blame Kushner.)
To: RummyChick
Please tell us, in your opinion, who WOULD have standing, if not Republican voters in Georgia?
To: RummyChick
It sound like “standing” is a blank check for judges to toss any lawsuit for which they have no sympathy. Using your reasoning, NO ONE has “standing” to challenge election fraud.
To: DannyTN
60
posted on
11/26/2020 11:04:16 AM PST
by
KevinB
(Quite literally, whatever the Left touches it ruins.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson