DannyTN's summary of Sidney Powell's GA filing

Self ^ | 11/26/2020 | DannyTN

[DannyTN]

The link leads to the full filing. The summary below is my own.

Here is my summary of the counts in Sidney's Georgia filing, I may have missed some. Especially count 5 where I stopped after a lot seemed repetitive. I also did not try to capture all of the estimated counts in the filing. The request for relief at the end was not summarized and posted verbatum.

Count 1 Defendents violated the Elections Clause and 42 U.S.C Rule changes and cure procedures conflict with state legislation.
This count includes

• workers not following procedures when counting,
• mail-in ballots sent to people who had not requested them,
• votes from people who had moved out of state

Count 2 Denial of Equal Protection. Secretary of State and Georgia counties violated the 14th Amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 1983

This count includes

• Opening ballots prior to election day in violation of legislative statute,
• improper procedures with lack of auditable logs,
• a large number of identical pristine ballots that were likely fraudulent,
• breach of chain of custody of voting machines the night before the election,
• failure to treat voters in all counties the same,
• the banning of observers,
• not allowing observers to review all envelopes,
• use of Dominion Democracy Suite software,
• workers switching votes from Trump to Biden,
• allowing ineligible ballots to be counted,
• use of Dominion software which allowed eligible ballots to be switched between candidates or lost altogether.

Count 3 Denial of Due Process 14th Amendment § 1983 Disparate treatment of Absentee/Mail-In Voters among different counties.
subjecting one class of voters to greater burdens or scrutiny than another.

Count 4 Denial of Due Process on the Right to Vote 14th Amendment Art 1 § 4, CL. 1; Art II § 1, Cl.2; Amend 16 U.S.C. § 1983.
This count includes all previous allegations,

• failure to count legal votes,
• failure to count votes free from distortion by illegal votes,
• failure to verify signatures,
• abnormally low signature rejection rate compared to states which have had mail-in voting for years.

Count 5 There was Wide-Spread Ballot Fraud OCGA 21-2-522
This count includes all previous paragraphs.

• Enough irregular ballots exist to put the election in doubt.
• Glitches in the Dominion system have uniform effect of hurting Trump and helping Biden.
• Fraudulent acts show votes being switched from Trump to Biden during the recount,
• lack of procedures to follow the election code,
• use of Dominion despite evidence of serious vulnerabilities,
• misrepresentations about a pipe burst that sent everyone home,
• while some poll workers remained and kept working on the machines,
• failure to maintain logs on the voting system for a genuine and sound audit,
• ballots received that were never requested,
• third parties voted an untold number of unlawfully acquired absentee or mail-in ballots,
• 20,311 voters had registered as having moved out of state,
• at least 96,600 mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast,
• 136,098 ballots were illegally counted as a result of improper manipulation of the Dominion software,
• mail in ballots were requested by 3rd parties or sent erroneously to persons and voted fraudulently,
• undetected by a failed system of signature verification

For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:

• 1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
• 2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
• 3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election; 101
• 4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
• 5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
• 6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
• 7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
• 8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
• 9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted; 102
• 10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects;
• 11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
• 12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
• 13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3.
• 14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988.

[rxtn41]

Thank you.....

[Getready]

Great review. Will bookmark. Msm kinda quiet...trying to play it down. I suppose similar filings for pa...mi...ariz...wisconsin. Jail time or severe sanctions per trump executive order 9/13/2018?

[RummyChick]

The Political Question Doctrine seems to fit this particular round.

[Getready]

May have tracked in real time before being wiped out. May be able to have tracked erasure procedures.

[Nathan _in_Arkansas]

It would seem they blocked observers so that no one could testify “I witnessed voter fraud/ impropriety,” in court. They’d take the slap in the wrist for limiting access for plausible deniability and lack of eye witnesses. Good thing it was still witnessed by astute observers.

[datura]

Thank you for posting and doing this work!!

[Beach333]

They also need to audit the bar codes against the printed text of the votes on the ballot.

[magua]

Thank you Danny I’m impressed.

[KC Burke]

The issue of Standing is always critical in these types of cases. I understand the plaintiffs are the R delegate slate.

Let’s get everyone’s input on Standing.

[OKSooner]

Yes, excellent work, thank you.

Happy Thanksgiving too.

[cynicalman]

Big Trump supporter but this is going nowhere

[aquila48]

Great summary - thanks.

I think Powell presents a pretty strong case. It’ll be interesting to see how it does under cross examination.

There seems to be no question that the states own election rules (laws) were violated in a substantial way to cast doubt on the results and thus, at a minimum, the election should not be certified.

What a mess!

[4Liberty]

[pepsi_junkie]

Here's the reality: judges have good reason to fear that a ruling in favor of Trump will result in cities burning. On the other hand they don't fear our side at all. So far we've sat back collectively as this played out and nobody was shot, nothing was burned, no roads were blocked, nothing really. So given that they will take the path of least resistance and rule for Biden because they're scared cucks and they don't want it on their consciences.

There's a reason Hitler had his brownshirts and there's a reason the demos have their modern equivalents ANTIFA and BLM. They can get what they want using threats and intimidation while maintaining a certain appearance of distance from that.

[ColoCdn]

Thank you for your work on this.

[Mad Dawg]

THANK YOU !!!

[cgbg]

If the court tosses the case out because “x does not have standing”, then the case just needs to be refiled with someone who does have standing.

That probably varies by state.

[cymbeline]

Thanks, DannyTN!

What happens with that filing? Does a judge go through each count and accept or reject it, and give reasons for the acceptance or rejection?

[KC Burke]

The clock runs out on Safe Harbor date or on EC vote.

[M Kehoe]

Bttt.

5.56mm