Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brad Raffensperger, GOP Secretary of State, says on CNN he expects hand recount will confirm GA count that now has Biden ahead by more than 14K. “We believe the statewide recount will confirm that.” He adds there hasn’t been widespread fraud
@mkraju ^ | Nov 11, 2020 | Manu Raju, CNN

Posted on 11/11/2020 3:57:19 PM PST by rintintin

Manu Raju @mkraju Brad Raffensperger, GOP Secretary of State, says on CNN he expects hand recount will confirm GA count that now has Biden ahead by more than 14K. “We believe the statewide recount will confirm that.” He adds there hasn’t been widespread fraud - “nothing in the nature of 10,000” 2:40 PM · Nov 11, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: PBRCat

> While there are some voters who do not wish to vote an entire ballot, this amount of ballots with only a single vote in a single race is completely unheard of.

I’m not disagreeing with you, but how do you prove those single-race ballots are fraudulent and not just peculiar?


61 posted on 11/11/2020 4:34:56 PM PST by shaven_llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: rintintin
So we're talking 14,000 votes out of 4.1 million cast. By my ciphering, that is about 0.34%. Doesn't sound like you'd need "widespread" fraud to generate that.

Why do these slime balls insist on adding the "widespread" qualifier when discussing fraud by the 'Rats? There should be no fraud at all. Widespread or narrow-spread, it should not be tolerated. A little fraud is just as pernicious as a lot, especially in a close election. This is how confidence in the electoral process is gradually eroded. Someone thinks, gee, there's fraud out there, that will cancel my legal vote with an illegal one, why should I bother? Chipping away a little bit at a time may take awhile, but the 'Rats are nothing if not masters at playing the long game. It took them generations to overwhelm the educational system in this country, and look at the results. Mindless robots who spout the values of socialism and they don't even know what it is.

62 posted on 11/11/2020 4:35:30 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

It’s his watch and he’s going under the bus.

Literally, his political career...his personal gravy train...is over when the fraud is identified. This happened while he was SOS and over the elections in Georgia.

My only suggestion to the Trump team is keep this guy away from the recount, audit and canvas. He’s not only tainted, he’s extremely desperate.


63 posted on 11/11/2020 4:35:39 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast (I did not leave my country, my country left me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Probably not. Consider the total votes in Fulton County (which is aptly nicknamed “FuCo”) were roughly 524,500.


64 posted on 11/11/2020 4:39:42 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I’m not so sure. A hand count will show any votes moved by the software. Also remember in 2016 when the green party called for a recount in Michigan. They opened the secured boxes containing the ballots and only about 10% of what was recorded on the box was in it. They very quickly dropped calling for the recount.


65 posted on 11/11/2020 4:43:14 PM PST by Kadric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

The mail-in ballots are separated from the signature panel - they become part of an undifferentiated mass of ballots, there is no way you can trace back to whomever it was that cast it. So, in effect you are running about 5M pieces of paper thought a scanner, and will find similar results. The evidence of large scale fraud would be found extrinsic to the received ballots they are looking at. It is upstream of the tabulation process. You would need testimony from parties involved, records of activity that facilitated the fraud - documents, e-mail traffic, cell phone records. In short the usual stuff you find in a criminal prosecution of financial fraud, for example. If the kind of fraud that we expect happened is to be prosecuted, the chances of assembling that kind of evidence in time to effect the election is close to zero.


66 posted on 11/11/2020 4:48:49 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

“ Whose side is this guy on?”

His own. He’s desperate - he’s responsible for the election. His political career ends when the fraud is proven. Kemp is probably gone as well.

They are desperate to stay on the free money gravy train and it looks like they’re about to get themselves thrown off.


67 posted on 11/11/2020 4:49:00 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast (I did not leave my country, my country left me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LilFarmer

We’ll see


68 posted on 11/11/2020 4:57:00 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Precisely


69 posted on 11/11/2020 4:57:21 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

not so fast—you haven’t seen my post from earlier today, so I am reposting it:

How To Find A Million Fraudulent Biden Ballots (no watermark required)!

(1) Identify ballots with sole vote cast for Biden

(2) Identify the state representative (not Congress, state = small districts) for the precinct.

(3) Verify that the state representative candidates on the ballot match the state representatives that should be on ballots in the precinct.

(4) Disqualify as fraudulent any ballots where the state representative candidates and the precinct do not match.

(5) Trump/Pence is re-elected.


There are 90,000 such votes in Georgia. It is very likely that a significant number were sent to the wrong precinct by the fraudsters.

While some locations may have moved the ballots out of the precincts, many more will still have them at that location or will identify which precincts were the source for each batch of ballots.

How could this not be caught by the given precincts when they recorded the ballots?

—Laziness
—Sloppiness
—Democratic leaning vote counters intentionally ignoring the issue

In addition, if the audit matches mail-in votes to signatures, there may be thousands of obviously fraudulent votes that would be disqualified.

The issue is disqualification of fraudulent votes.

It is totally doable with the audit of votes.


70 posted on 11/11/2020 4:59:22 PM PST by cgbg ( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
He and Kemp both have financial interest in Dominion

Please post your evidence of this or shut your pie hole.

71 posted on 11/11/2020 5:07:49 PM PST by EarlyBird (ThereÂ’s a whole lot of winning going on around here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

same one that gave hillery the debate questions, the same belligerent adamant demanding “I” won the election and the same demoncrat gifted to the peach state) would shock you to reality.
No shenanigans from these deeders should surprise. Ballot harvesting is just wrong, illegal too, slackers shouldn’t be motorvated.


72 posted on 11/11/2020 5:08:56 PM PST by Recompennation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I thought he said earlier that there would be an audit as well as a hand recount. Audits *should* show the illegal votes that were *mistakenly* counted. Not holding my breath here. RINOs are all over the place.


73 posted on 11/11/2020 5:13:16 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

“What politician is going to admit things were so screwed up under their watch??”

************************************************************

BOOOOOOOMMMM!!!

You win the Captain Obvious award.

First thing I thought of too, when I heard what he said.

Imagine Ratsberger saying, “Yeah, we really got busted for all that fraud we tried to pull”.


74 posted on 11/11/2020 5:15:47 PM PST by Sir Bangaz Cracka (Slamming dat white cracka'a head into dat sidewalk causin he be scared)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

Instead, there has just be enough fraud to give the criminal democrats a 14K vote lead.

We live in a world where lying is so normal, our government just expects us to accept it.

JoMa


75 posted on 11/11/2020 5:20:38 PM PST by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Yes, that is the crucial issue, not the recount.


76 posted on 11/11/2020 5:26:32 PM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

No, if you win FL and NC easily!


77 posted on 11/11/2020 5:27:47 PM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: euclid216

Part of the targeted fraud.

Widespread fraud implies that it was statewide when they didn’t need to do that.

Just target Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Allentown (all Dem strongholds) and Pennsylvania is won.


78 posted on 11/11/2020 5:28:18 PM PST by airborne (I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mozzafiato

I’m sure that more registered Democrats voted for Trump than the other way around. Recounts only recount the same ballots, and unless there’s an erroneous tabulation or total, you’re only recounting the same stuffed ballots again.


79 posted on 11/11/2020 5:29:37 PM PST by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I don’t know. I’ve only just started hearing about him.


80 posted on 11/11/2020 5:32:01 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson