Posted on 11/11/2020 8:16:55 AM PST by struggle
This showed up on twitter so take it for what it's worth.
Giuliani said on Steve Bannon's WarRoom podcast that whistleblowers from Dominion have come forward.
If it's true, then the DNC is absolute chaos right now.
That’s just your opinion. Many believe the evidence so far amassed is irrefutable. A Judge or judges will have the final say.
Are you serious? And I read stuff yesterday that Soros owned these some other voting machines, this is unreal.
Please share just one legitimate explanation for why a ballot might have been received before it was sent.
You are missing the point, it's not up to the courts, its up to the State Legislatures to fix this by sending an alternate slate of electors or refusing to certify the results per Article II of the Constitution.
As always, Trump is playing 4D chess while his opponents are playing tick-tack-toe ...
“That’s got me searching for deeper proofs.”
Where did you search at?
Praise God.
Rudy is a FIGHTER and a Patriot Warrior.
I’m not impressed when people announce that they are going to announce. Time to release evidence.
Completely agree! I'm defending my initial stance. If Trump and team can just invalidate the election results, get it thrown to the Republican state legislatures, we're good.
I'm trying to warn everyone about self-congratulating over every little article speaking to fraud. You're setting yourself up for disappointment if those suppositions do not come to fruition.
The first to squeal gets the deal.
We know you have been examining the machine results and working to get around the issues you have named. Are you making progress and can you give us an indication that you might have a postitive outcome?
And a hearty thanks to you and others for all the hard work all are doing on this.
You're missing my point. I'm not speaking to legitimacy. No thinking person would see that for anything but what it is. I'm saying that it's just a problem of logic. You couldn't take that one piece of information to a judge, state that it's proof of fraud, and expect the judge to just agree.
I got you and agree, with the caveat that Trump & company would not have started this if they could not back up the claims since not doing so would destroy them.
>The first to squeal gets the deal.
They need to be throwing this stuff out there like crazy. It has to be proved in the public’s eye; then the Dems will back down.
There’s no way the Dems almost lose the house and Reps keep the Senate and Biden wins 75 million votes.
The first to squeal gets the deal.
Hi Laz!
Gonna take your “I’m IT” and raise you “35 years of software development”. It is trivial to decompile machine code.
Rolling it back on every machine would be hard. Even if it was a built-in function it would leave traces unless done perfectly. They couldn’t be certain they would not be discovered and that they would get every machine. So they probably limited it to certain machines they felt they could control access to after the fact, and just used those to run up the score for Biden. In which case it likely was erased at the same time the ballot dumps occurred. But are they that smart? I doubt it. Their vote-switching software didn’t anticipate the Trump turnout, so they had to call in a ballot dump in desperation. They overreached and they are caught.
All they have to do is show either: A) significantly different results from the claimed outcome in a full recount, or B) different results for the same batch of ballots on different machines, or C) a large discrepancy between the number of votes claimed and the actual count of the ballots. Or any combination of those things.
However, I agree strongly with your points 1 & 3.
I'll cede that one. I've never bothered, so I don't really know for sure. While you can certainly decompile, you'll not have really easy-to-understand variable names, and you'd have to hope you assign the right intent to each one.
Me too. Lots of affidavits from people without hard evidence.
How about the hundreds of affidavits.
“500 sworn witnesses holds up in court last I checked.
This would only serve to show that fraud occurred. It might strike off a second election, but it won’t invalidate everything. “
You don’t know that, you don’t know what the affidavits say. Indeed, word out this morning there are at least two from Dominion who are whistle blowers...that is much larger in terms of number of votes affected.
“Unconstitutionally counting ballots after deadline holds up in court last I checked.
I agree with this. However, if they didn’t set aside those ballots counted after a certain time, there’s no way to ascertain which ones to throw out. “
Yes, but they cannot allow the citizens votes to be disenfranchised by the crookedness of the local politicians.
“Software with intended glitches holds up in court last I checked.
Also correct, but as an IT engineer with experience in digital forensics, I can tell you that identifying this conclusively is going to be a yeoman’s task, if possible at all.”
Refer to the Dominion whistle blowers above...it was Guiliani who stated he had several witnesses from within Dominion...he would not say it is it wasn’t true.
Sounds familiar to what the CIA,Bush Fam and Karl Rove did to Don Seigelman in Alabama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.