(RESEARCH THREAD) The Anatomy of This Particular Steal

Freeper collaberation | 11/8/2020 | By Laz A. Mataz and LilFarmer (so far)

[Lazamataz]

PLEASE NOTE. THIS IS A RESEARCH THREAD. I NEED ALL HANDS ON DECK TO PROVIDE AS MUCH EVIDENCE, HARD EVIDENCE, AS POSSIBLE. I WILL MONITOR THIS THREAD AND COMPILE ALL CONTRIBUTIONS TO A NEW AND REFINED THREAD. I HOPE TO ACCOMPLISH THIS BY TONIGHT. I NEED YOUR HELP!

This election has been stolen. Pure and simple.

Now we must show the world, before December 13^th when the Electors are appointed, and before the Special Elections occur for various runoffs that will happen (for example, in Georgia, for the Senate seats, on January 5^th.

How did it occur, you may ask.

It was twofold: One, certain ballot counting machines were altered to give a particular percentage advantage to Joe Biden. It would subtract votes from Donald Trump, and give them to Joe Biden. These machines are provided by a company owned and managed by the Clintons and / or the Obamas. That company is called Dominion Voting Systems. There are various models of the vote tabulation machines. There is a rumor that the software is called Hammer and Scorecard, but it is meaningless what the software is called, more important is its function, described above.

The night of the election, it was becoming apparent to the powers that exist in the Democrat Party that the software boost would not be enough. Donald Trump was racking up very substantial leads, enough to swamp the artifically-inflated advantage to Biden that the software was creating. Suddenly, various excuses emerged on why certain precincts in swing states needed to stop counting. Those precincts sent Republican observers home, with the promise the precincts would continue that next morning. In Georgia, those precincts were, at least in-part:

Fulton 03D
EP04C
SC15A
SC17B
03P2
04A
JC01A
SC08G
01I
CP04A
Not Reporting CP084
Not Reporting SC08H
Not Reporting UC01D

Fortunately, yours truly happened to record those precints, again in-part, and their status, on the morning of November 4^th, in a thread located here: Georgia Fraud Watch information

THE FIRST COMPONENT OF THE STEAL

The first component of The Big Steal is the vote counting machines. Certain machines were altered to undercount Trump votes and overcount Biden votes. We do not know the exact percentage of vote conversions, but whatever it was, the Democrat Powers believed it would be enough to take Biden over the top in several swing-states. Those states are: Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Missouri. There are other states that use this software, but they do not seem to have been terribly effected.)

Here is as much proof as I can provide. I want good Freepers to provide as much additional proof as possible downthread.

• A poll watcher saw someone put an update on the Dominion Voting System computer JUST before the voting and tabulation began happening. That late of an update does not provide Republican experts the chance to review the code for fraudulent counting algorithms, and besides, one would need to see the code. I have found an article detailing this very suspicious computer update: Update (1100ET): Further down the 'Domminion Voting System' rabbit-hole, Politico reports that a technology glitch that halted voting in two Georgia counties on Tuesday morning was caused by a vendor uploading an update to their election machines the night before, a county election supervisor said.

• An election clerk in Michigan discovered that the vote total counted by the software did not match the printed tabulator tapes.

• FULTON COUNTY, Ga. (WTOC) -Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger released a statement on Twitter Saturday announcing that Fulton County has discovered an issue involving reporting from their work on Friday.. Reportedly, that 'issue' has caused incorrect totalling of ballots to occur in certain counties, most notably Chatham and Fulton.
  
  
• In the same state, Georgia, one of the updates was submitted on November 6^th: 8:45 p.m. | Computer malfunctions in Gwinnett have meant that everyone has gone home except the IT folks.
  Unsupervised. Only the IT people. No Republican observers. Im IT, and I'm very uncomfortable with that. This was in Gwinnett county.
  
  THE SECOND COMPONENT OF THE STEAL

  Once it became obvious that the software intended to switch a number of votes from Trump to Biden was simply insufficient to overcome Trump's natural lead, the swing states targeted by the Democrat Powers swung into action.

• Within hours of one another, these swing states began claiming they needed to stop counting until the next morning.Yet, obviously, after the Republican observers foolishly believed these people, the counting ramped up with no Republican observers present.

• In Michigan, they closed the counting before midnight (Note, I could use proof of time), promising to reconvene at 9AM. Yet, these same people submitted new counts at 3AM -- impossible, if they stopped counting. Here is the proof of the Michigan 3AM vote injection.

• Michigan's corrupted vote counters spent the interim manufacturing these Biden ballots, 100% of which were for Joe Biden, but ONLY Joe Biden. NO downticket votes. These corrupt workers did not have the time to mark the downtickets. They were under extremely tight timeframes.

• Interestingly, Snopes and all the other 'false' fact checkers state that the jump was because of a typo. The number, according to them, should have been 153,710 Biden, 23,154 Trump..
  NOT STATISTICALLY POSSIBLE. As late as January of 2019, the BBC reports: "Because Michigan voters aren’t required to register their party affiliation, there’s no way to know for sure how many Democrats versus Republicans live in Shiawassee County. However, county leaders have said they believe the political makeup here is roughly split evenly between Republicans and Democrats."

• Again in Michigan, there were confirmed reports that Republican poll watchers were instructed to stand 100 feet from the counters, and had their vision blocked by people papering over the windows through which they were permitted to view, and even having a forklift running in front of them (obscuring their vision). (Note, can some of you researchers provide me links to these three assertions?)
• In Georgia, the same shutdown occurred at 10:30 PM. Republican observers were sent home, proof of which is here. Though the counting was supposed to have stopped at 10:30 PM, vote counts SHARPLY jumped for Democrats between 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM, proof of which can be seen here.

  PROOF, by screen capture, that strongly suggests that the vote counting was (purposefully) flawed. It can be presumed that those votes went to Joe Biden. The first capture was at 12:03, Jo Jorgenson had 89,025 votes. Then at 12:15, she had 46,987 votes.

  

  Time is moving forward. Because of that, I will post this article as-is with the thought I will post refined versions downthread. Please, you who can contribute more information, please do, and I will incorporate it if it seems to fit this article's purpose.

[grey_whiskers]

from thedonald.win:

Here’s the idea:

People on the left are now claiming that elections (since towns start with a finite size, the counting doesn’t start at 0) don’t follow Benford’s Law, that you have to “normalize” the data. And once you do, Biden totals look real.

I have a PhD a VERY hard science (quantum mechanics). So I follow Dick Feynman’s Law, “It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong.”

Here’s my idea. It doesn’t involve normalizing or anything.

Let’s use REAL ELECTION DATA from this election.

Separate out Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania, and Nevada. Put them aside for a moment.

Do Benford’s Law for each and every other state in the country, one state at a time. For Dems, Trump, and Libertardtarian. That automatically removes any second-guessing about “assumptions” or “models”.

But that’s just the first step.

Do it at 9PM election day. Do it at 7AM Nov.4 (for both the total, and for just the late votes). Do it at 7AM Nov.5 (for both the total, and for just the late votes). Do it at 7AM Nov.6 (for both the total, and for just the late votes).

Then do the same thing, for the US Senate race in each case.

This will show

a) if Benford’s Law holds for THIS election without normalizing. b) if Benford’s Law suddenly changes with new votes c) if Benford’s Law holds for the Senate but not the Presidency.

Then do the same thing for each of the supposed Dem Fraud States.

And you have an unmassaged, real-time, control group...on THIS election, so there’s no apples to oranges.

ANY TAKERS?

(Someone get this to the datacrunchers behind the Trump team, please!)

[grey_whiskers]

“from thedonald.win:

Long time lurker coming off the sidelines. I’m not one of the chans or anons, so my autist skills are limited. Just doing what I can to Stop the Steal.

I’ve already passed this information to the Trump campaign. I thought I’d share with the community that has inspired me so much this year.

Summary: Using the Pennsylvania voter information website, I have identified a significant number of discrepancies in the general election mail in votes.

Data Sources: https://data.pa.gov/d/mcba-yywm/visualization https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-General-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/mcba-yywm https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElections/CandidatesCommittees/RunningforOffice/Documents/2020/2020%20important%20dates.pdf https://www.oldest.org/people/living-persons/

After reviewing data in the visualizer and finding red flags, I exported the file. Excel has row limitations, so my analysis is limited to roughly 1M out of 3.1M mail votes. There seem to be both ballot issues and application issues. Some of the ballots have multiple issues, but for simplification purposes, I set a single status. I chose based on my perception of severity, with more severe issues taking precedence.

In this data set, there were 879,117 votes received out of 1,048,575 recorded applications. This is an improbably high 83.8% return rate given reported return rates in other states.

Breakdown of issues on ballots received by PA :

12,066 returned the same day as it was mailed to voter (impossible given nature of USPS delivery)

18,785 returned the day after ballot mailed to voter (also impossible given nature of USPS delivery)

7,498 returned before the ballot was mailed

3,187 returned but not mailed to voter

1,328 mailed before the voter submitted application

799 returned before election start of 9/28/20

8 mailed without application submitted by voter

2 votes from the future (not in 2020)

The above discrepancies total 43,673, or 4.96% of mail in ballots submitted to PA. Extrapolation for the rest of the votes would be approximately 154,000 votes with irregularities. Given that the party registration was approximately 2/3 Dems, if all these were to be invalidated,Trump would be beating Biden’s current margin in PA
Original post which inspired me to take some action: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKj14de/hey-folks-i-have-been-in-contact/ >
“

[grey_whiskers]

https://twitter.com/slavtrapgod/status/1325301932408229889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1325301932408229889%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthedonald.win%2Fnew

Election Summary Report for Gwinnet County, Georgia.
Total Population: 936,250
Total Registered Voters: 581,467
Voter Participation: 408,268 (70.21%)
Ballots Cast?

811,836.

1.36 ballots per registered voter.
1.99 ballots per participating voter.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EmRrFZjVMAAohNw?format=jpg&name=900x900

I haven’t had this much fun with math since high school.
26.6% of Gwinnett is under the age of 18 (249,042). Number of legal adults (including those that didn’t/can’t vote) is 687,207, which would be our theoretic maximum amount of ballots, at a 100% registration/participation.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EmRyBqcVoAAc-Tt?format=jpg&name=large

So my very final question is thus: How in the world were there not only 230,369 MORE BALLOTS than registered voters, but 124,628 MORE BALLOTS than there are adults in Gwinnett County?

[Scotswife]

How many people would have the credentials to “update” the system?
And wouldn’t they have to perform the update as they are logged in?

I’m no IT pro - but it appears we are looking for a small group of peeps who need to have their laptops siezed.

[mo]

need to focus on the RED districts, precincts and counties.

This guy explains it very clearly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSuFRLEYbDg

watch it all

Even RED STATES and RED Districts require an AUDIT-not a recount

they’re banking on none of us looking too hard in the RED

[nfldgirl]

If all for real, and I have no doubt that it is, what can be done about it? Can it be proven? Without proof, it’ll go nowhere. Can we assume that Trump/Pence/Rudy, et al. are on to this? And, again, what can be proven?

[Irish Eyes]

Place mark, important thread.

[Ciaphas Cain]

This gives me hope. Thank you for what you do Laz.

[mo]

try 450000 THOUSAND!!!!nationwide. so far.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/identified-450000-ballots-miraculously-vote-joe-biden-sidney-powell-drops-bomb-sunday-morning-futures-video/

[coloradan]

This election (Bevin/Beshear) was in 2019.

[mo]

Short description of why Red precincts are important.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325463843565412354.html

[TianaHighrider]

MAJOR BOOKMARK

[AndyJackson]

Lin Wood is one of Trump’s attorneys along with Jay Sekelow [we have the best attorneys] and is quite aware of Sidney’s concerns.

[LilFarmer]

April 16, 2020:

Former White House Cybersecurity Coordinator, Michael Daniel, notes in the film that voting machine companies generally are not known for cybersecurity expertise. Jake Stauffer, a former cyber analyst for the Air Force who has tested ES&S and Dominion voting systems for the state of California observed that:

What I have found, especially in the voting system arena, is that security is not really taken very seriously.

Jake Stauffer, former cyber analyst for the Air Force who tested ES&S and Dominion voting machines.

When Stauffer tested ES&S’s DS200 machine, they found multiple vulnerabilities that would enable an attacker to gain full access to the system, change configurations, and install a modified operating system without election officials knowing. Stauffer states that the vulnerabilities would enable a hacker to gain the highest level of privilege and gain remote access into the system and do whatever they wanted to do, “whether its change an election or shut the system down.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jodywestby/2020/04/16/hbo-documentary-shows-the-value-of-cybersecurity-in-election-security/?sh=7ba3b8d63f1c

[grey_whiskers]

https://twitter.com/slavtrapgod/status/1325301932408229889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1325301932408229889%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthedonald.win%2Fnew

Election Summary Report for Gwinnet County, Georgia.
Total Population: 936,250
Total Registered Voters: 581,467
Voter Participation: 408,268 (70.21%)
Ballots Cast?

811,836.

1.36 ballots per registered voter.
1.99 ballots per participating voter.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EmRrFZjVMAAohNw?format=jpg&name=900x900

I haven’t had this much fun with math since high school.
26.6% of Gwinnett is under the age of 18 (249,042). Number of legal adults (including those that didn’t/can’t vote) is 687,207, which would be our theoretic maximum amount of ballots, at a 100% registration/participation.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EmRyBqcVoAAc-Tt?format=jpg&name=large

So my very final question is thus: How in the world were there not only 230,369 MORE BALLOTS than registered voters, but 124,628 MORE BALLOTS than there are adults in Gwinnett County?

[mo]

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325463843565412354.html

[Scotswife]

And so .... anyone could have done it without so much as a username/password?
Or log of files installed?

Let me guess - no cameras either?

[LilFarmer]

I have responded to this already but some suggest that the referendum was counted as a separate ballot.

403,568 referendum
408,268 total votes
=811,836

https://www.gwinnettcounty.com/static/departments/elections/2020_Election/pdf/11.03.2020%20General%20Election%20Unofficial%20and%20Incomplete%20-%20Election%20Summary.pdf

[Presbyterian Reporter]

I believe it is time for FReepers to start doing some number crunching.

Here is the data comparing Pennsylvania voter turnout for 2016 vs 2020.

2020 TOTAL 6,743,874
2016 TOTAL 6,038,687

# CHANGE 705,187
% CHANGE 11.7%

As of 1 pm today, Pennsylvania has 705,167 (11.7%) more votes than in 2016.

Here is the link to the 2020 PA data-—
https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/General/SummaryResults?ElectionID=83&ElectionType=G&IsActive=1

Here is the link to the 2016 PA data-—
https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/General/SummaryResults?ElectionID=54&ElectionType=G&IsActive=0

The next step in analyzing the PA data is to do an analysis comparing the 2016 voter turnout to the 2020 voter turnout on a BY COUNTY basis.

Which counties had huge voter turnouts in 2020 vs 2016?

Is there a FReeper who can convert the PA data for 2016 and 2020 BY COUNTY to an EXCEL spreadsheet?

[Shark24]

Ya gotta start somewhere.