… practicing staying up late for the FUN tomorrow!!
Posted on 10/31/2020 6:27:09 PM PDT by ransomnote
Most of the views seem to come with some pretty bad comments. Ii's clear and sad at the same time that people are watching him for pure entertainment value. I think he will get a nice little gig on SNL when this is done. Seriously.
The comments thread on YouTube was interesting lol.
I'll share my favorite comments: ((And believe me the whole thread is like this!))
"Correct title: "Exhausted Biden shouts incoherently from a teleprompter to a handful of cars""
"Biden rants like a raging bum demanding your spare change for beer money."
"This whole speech makes more sense if you assume the honking is booing."
"This is why Trump will have a landslide victory."
"Am I the only one hearing the boos?He can not even get good at his own honk rallies."
"Its like looking at a professional concert with Trump. and with Biden an elementary school stage!"
"People are legit booing but the honking mufflers it. Jesus what a joke"
"My favorite part is when he said and I quote” The ovaltine dent in 2019”. Then he followed up with “ sprapa doopy spunket dole”. How do you argue with that profound wisdom?"
"Between the super lame honking and the ungrounded speaker cable creating an endless buzzing, this "rally" is cringey and literally painful to watch."
"Democrats divided this nation. This is a glimpse into Biden’s America. Looting, rioting, Murder."
"Obama: “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f–k things up.” Yep. Obummer said that back in April"
Just finished watching the Grand Rapids rally, LIVE. Pence was great, his best line really grabbed me and others on this thread - tomorrow we pull the plug. The biggest roar from the crowd for Trump IMO was when he said running for president was the best decision he ever made. They have been successful in their goal. X22 from tonight put more into perspective as he always does. The Dems could not keep us locked up with Covid and push mail in voting. They urged their voters to vote by mail. Now they are urging them to turn out in person. Too late, boohoohoo. They don’t have enough voters. The laptop was the Trump card, after the landslide comes in Joe will concede as he has made a deal to escape prosecution. Maybe Hunter has too. Either way it is over. What a show! And it is just getting started, this was Act One. Grateful to FR and all of you!
Good comments. I particularly like this one:
“This whole speech makes more sense if you assume the honking is booing.”
But I also agree with another poster that it’s painful to watch. Cringeworthy and pathetic. I almost feel bad for the guy. But even if I were to have some sympathy for Biden, I have none for the Democrat Party and all their leftist supporters. Biden’s humiliation is their humiliation.
 |
 |
 |
 |
As New FBI Dir. !! Kek |
Scavino=#4827 EndrsGame |
16 @16 blue cities tyBran |
4.7k out of 19k tax crimes? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
 |
 |
 |
 |
Attempts Dunkn' Trump |
in Spanish |
10/30/17 thru 10/31/20 |
Weapons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That last Q drop goes to Last of the Mohicans Promontory again. That means - operators are in action
Yes it does. There must be much going on behind the scenes that we don’t know about. I’m trusting that the Trump administration has the voter fraud issues under control, and that they’re not sitting back idly watching as the left makes their plans for civil unrest..
Red sky at night, sailor’s delight.
Ya beat me to it shipmate :)
Greeneyes,
Are you aware of the great controversy that happend around 380 to 400 AD...with AUGUSTINE and a British monk whose name was PELAGIUS ?
Pelagius was teaching theology in Rome..when he read AUGUSTINE...he had a tizzy fit..because Augustine taught about human sinfulness, and the need for Divine Grace...Pelagius objected because he thought that what Augustine was saying was an unacceptable novelty.
It is thought that Pelagianism was bound to arise, because the Church had not defined the concept of sin very well.
Everyone agreed that people everywhere were sinners, and in need of Divine Grace. the point of controversy began when people began to argue about what sin WAS, and WHERE it had come from.
The Bible says that when God created the world, it was good. The Son of God had become a man and lived a sinless life in a material body, which would not have been possible if matter were inherently sinful. (this is a Gnostic view, not Christian.)
Finally and not least, the promise of salvation included the resurrection of the body, which would have been inconceivable if the body was beyond redemption. Evil was therefore not something that God had created, but what was it?
Satan appeared to Adam and Eve and tempted them into following him in his rebellion even though they knew that what they were doing was wrong. Their sin was not an inescapable part of their created nature but was an act of disobedience to the revealed will of God. On this, Augustine and Pelagius were agreed, but it was not clear what the consequences of Adam’s disobedience were for the rest of humanity. Does everyone sin by their own free choice, as Adam and Eve did, or do we inherit an innate sinfulness that cuts us off from God, whether we commit actual sins or not? To put it another way, is a newborn baby a sinner in need of salvation even if he has not done anything wrong? In an era when infant mortality rates were high, this was a pressing question for many Christians, who found it impossible to believe that God would condemn a baby to hell merely because of what Adam and Eve had done.
The dispute between Augustine and Pelagius was not about the origin of sin but about the effect of Adam’s disobedience on his posterity. Augustine maintained that all human beings have inherited the broken relationship with God caused by the disobedience of our first parents. We are not free to choose our inheritance and must accept what we have been given.
Pelagius, on the other hand, believed that sin is an act of the will and that, like Adam and Eve, every human being is free to choose whether he will sin. Pelagius admitted that in practice everyone does choose to sin, and so his position was that human beings are sinners, but there is an important difference of principle that shows us just how incompatible the two views are.
Pelagius believed that every human being is granted free will in the same way that Adam and Eve were. He insisted that sinlessness must therefore be theoretically possible, because if it were not, human beings could not be held responsible for their freely chosen sinful actions. Furthermore, Pelagius argued, God would not have commanded people to act righteously if He knew that they were incapable of doing so, because God does not ask us to do the impossible. In his view, the law of Moses would have no meaning if it could not be kept, even if nobody actually did so. Pelagius believed that Jesus was the exception that proved the rule. He had kept the law perfectly and was therefore sinless. The fact that He achieved this shows that it is possible, and it makes those who fail to live up to the standard guilty of their sin. To Pelagius and those who thought like him, this seemed fair—people are rightly held responsible for their own failings but not for those of others, including the disobedience of Adam and Eve.
Reluctance to accept the transmission of sin from one generation to another was compounded by the question of guilt. Some people accepted that the weakness of the flesh was such that every human being would fall into sin sooner or later, but they could not agree that we are individually responsible for that weakness and therefore guilty in the sight of God. Pelagians believed that responsibility and guilt are meaningful only in the context of actual sins committed. They had no concept of innate sinfulness as distinct from sinful acts and therefore rejected the idea of “original sin.”
Augustine himself wrestled with these questions in his early days as a Christian, and it was only slowly that he came to understand sinfulness as something distinct from sinful acts voluntarily committed by people who were exercising their free will. Augustine did not deny that human beings have the freedom to choose between good and evil, but following the teaching of Paul in Romans 7, he came to see that even if we choose what is good, we are incapable of doing it. We may not want to sin, but we have no alternative because our will is in bondage to the power of evil.
Like Augustine, Pelagius believed in the need for divine grace, but he interpreted this differently. Where Augustine believed that God’s grace is needed to deliver us from a spiritual condition that we can do nothing about, Pelagius thought of it as the power given to us so that we can choose what is good. In his view, God helps us achieve spiritual perfection by enlightening our souls in baptism and by giving us the Holy Spirit to guide us along the way to perfection.
Pelagius did not believe that the sinlessness of Christ is easily obtainable by anyone who desires it. He knew that the lure of temptation is too great to resist other than by the grace of God. The gulf that separated Augustine from Pelagius was hard for many people to appreciate because by stressing the need for divine grace to help us overcome our weakness, Pelagius appeared to give God the credit for human salvation.
Augustine retorted that although human nature retains the goodness of its creation, human beings are cut off from God, with the result that everything good in our created nature is perverted and abused. Sinfulness is a universal spiritual condition, not a voluntary choice that can be mitigated or reversed, so that every human being, including the newly born infant, stands in the same broken relationship with God. In Augustine’s view, no amount of moral training can deliver a person from his inherited sinfulness. That can only be achieved by spiritual death and resurrection to a new life, which is not ours but Christ’s. The role of the Holy Spirit is not to enlighten our minds and strengthen our wills to follow Christ but to impart His new life to us by coming to dwell in our hearts and uniting us to Him. Our “righteousness” is not ours at all—it is the righteousness of Christ at work in us.
Augustine maintained and developed his opposition to Pelagianism until his death in AD 430, but by then most of the church had been won over to his views. Pelagius and his followers were condemned several times, but that is not the whole story, because the beliefs that lie behind Pelagianism are more than the heresy of one man and his followers. The desire to find some good in fallen humanity and to exempt small children (in particular) from the consequences of original sin remains very strong, as does the feeling that punishment should be meted out only to those who commit actual sins. The idea that there is a universal human sinfulness for which we are all responsible is hard for many people to accept, even if they are officially committed to Augustinian principles. As a result, Pelagian beliefs are still common today, even though Pelagius himself has largely been forgotten.
Much of the above article was written and published in TABLETALK by Dr. Gerald Bray who is a research professor for Beeson Divinity School.
The reason I’ve included extensive parts of this article.. was to demonstrate that Pelagius taught that new borns are as a clean slate. they are neither born evil or good. Indeed.. that is what Pelagius taught.. BUT “Pelagianism was opposed by Augustine, bishop of Hippo in Africa, who asserted that human beings cannot attain righteousness by their own efforts and are totally dependent upon the grace of God. Condemned by two councils of African bishops in 416 and again at Carthage in 418, Pelagius was finally excommunicated in 418; Pelagius’s later fate is unknown.” (Quote from the Encyclopedia Brittanica)
I apoloiise for this lengthy reply to the assertion that you’ve made regarding children, being NOT born evil or good. This assertion is Pelagian, condemned by 2 Church councils as heretical.
Let’s VOTE tomorrow! TRUMP 2020!~
Again, thank you for your kind attention.
“Unfortunately, I assume FR will go down again due to overloads or deliberate attacks.
Hoping OANN can stay on the air.
GOOD NEWS: The stock futures tonight seem to be forecasting a Trump victory.
If we lose touch, then see y’all on the other side.
Courage.
WWG1WGA.”
If FR goes down you can come join us at http://libertyauthors.com/ like a number of FreeQs have already.
Did you NOT get the message up thread to kindly stop posting this stuff on the Q thread?
I am so sorry to tell you that I simply have a different faith and I do not agree with it. And your authorities are not mine.
I do not appreciate this post, and further more I have asked time and again that people quit posting to me about this subject.
I have my faith and it obviously is not the same as yours. I would thank you and anyone else to kindly refrain from posting this stuff to me on the Q thread.
Good grief!!!
Someone writing about this somewhere surmised the Rats were trying to figure out why the numbers weren't coming back as they expected and were trying to fix it somehow.
To the best of my ability to recall, there was also a delay calling Georgia till sometime just before or after midnight. I had just moved to Texas from Georgia and I knew something fishy was going on there. Georgia was reliably red and from the previous 5 years I had voted there, Georgia was always called either right away or within an hour and a half after polls closed.
Before the election, I specifically remember that Jeh Johnson, DHS, and O'Bozo were attempting to reach out to assist the states if there were any possible irregularities after warning that unspecified foreign hackers were attempting to interfere in our elections. Then wouldn't ya know it suddenly the Secretary of State is reporting in the news that someone had attempted to hack into our voter systems but were unsuccessful. Of course, Jeh and Bambi came rushing to offer help but thankfully Governor Nathan Deal and the Secretary said; "Thanks but no thanks, our state will handle this."
Later on, state officials discovered it was DHS that had tried to access the systems in Georgia. Jeh got call on it, said he would investigate it, then came back and admitted it but claimed it was an accident and that it happened when DHS was testing their systems.
YEAH, RIGHT!
RE: Q #4949
The largest flying American flag in the world on a flagpole is in Gastonia, North Carolina.
The 65’ tall and 114’ wide flag is flown on a 225’ flagpole and can be seen for 30 miles. Each stripe on the flag is 5’ tall and each star measures more than 4’ across.
It was organized by Gastonia AMVETS Post 920 whose veterans traveled across the country to raise money for the 7-year project which was completed in 1999.
I remember that hacking incident. I figured they were trying to do a little election rigging and got caught. Maybe we’ll find out for sure sometime in the next 4 years.
Because Biden did a political ad "calling the faithful" to jihad and Vienna is the practice run?
2:57 AM - November 3, 2020
Our favorite President’s morning message (pinned at the top of link)
VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!
plus video of “The Dance” ;-)
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump
Do not be surprised if we see a redux of the Bush/Gore decision.
Originalists will look at it and send it back to the States, with the caveat to follow the rules as legislated.
Which, IMO, was the correct ruling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
