Posted on 10/02/2020 12:08:13 AM PDT by ransomnote
ThankQ !!!!
No advocation of violence by these citizens, but won't allow this type of shenanigans that lefty states have allowed.
If so, then isn’t there something like Law of Armed Combatants that addresses this?
You bet, citizens addressing illegal violence are not under foreign influence, not engaging in seditious and insurrectionist activities. '"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for few public officials." (George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 425-426)'. At least around here, the Sheriffs are four square pro-militia.
And who is behind those #hadenough... guys?
Besides the Constitution, the Spirit of 76.
What do you think of the proud boys meeting with BLM?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did that happen? What was it? All i have read about is the Proud Boys anti-auntiefaz protest.
POTUS just released a brief video from Walter Reed, thanking his supporters. At the end of his message, he makes a somewhat cryptic comment about having learned a lot about COVID from the experience and how he’s going to share what he’s learned with the public.
I will bet this wonderful human jackwagon has a "Hate has no home here" sign on his front lawn.
The #hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group. They want violence post election, they’ll get it. They are because of foreign influence illegal/unprivileged combatants, they have ZERO rights to participate in these activities and are afforded NO rights in the ensuing melee. That ma’am is Federal Law.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Could they start their own thread? ‘Cause Q Anon is being falsely portrayed as “dangerous” in the House and MSM and using this thread to support the generalized violence advocated by hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group would needlessly smear the Q Anon peeps.
Q Anon doesn’t advocate violence and is being unfairly censored on the web; we’re lucky we have a home. This is Jim’s house - we can pick up after ourselves and avoid being boorish guests. Why contribute to the false perception being pedaled by Pelosi/MSM?
The violent videos we’ve seen over the past months are psyops on a number of levels and the hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group appears to be taking the bait.
The punk in the linked video clip was treated as a symbolic target- a stand in for other thugs we’ve seen committing violent anarchist crimes elsewhere. But this punk hadn’t actually done anything worth punching. This attack is similar to BLM attacking white drivers as symbols of racism encountered elsewhere committed by other people.
Trump/Q are fighting to instill the rule of law and none of their tactics involved civil war - street violence. None of their strategies involve unprovoked violence against soft targets standing holding signs.
Those Nuse media people are gonna need sedation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ahem I think the correct spelling is “Noose” media”.
thankyouverymuch!
Including everyone here; do the cabinets look the same in the parler vid, as in the two-flags one?
Two flags, from honeysuckleTN post #941:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3889724/posts?page=941#941
Parler vid:
https://video.parler.com/Bi/AE/BiAE4RNdIfeY.mp4
Cats Pajamas wrote:
interesting pics Walter Reed Pres Suite out in open source”
Here too:
https://video.parler.com/Bi/AE/BiAE4RNdIfeY.mp4
Are the white cabinets the same as in the vid with the two flags?”
and it’s mighty white of you to mention it.
No, they advocate no violence, they wish a peaceful transition, but they operate IRL where the same perspective is not shared by the Left. Q has consistently highlighted the consequences of LOAC for those illegally participating in insurrection as did Justice Kavanaugh. Ignoring the consequences of Federal Law doesn't relieve on of those same consequences. Some of us took oaths, those oaths will be upheld lawfully.
I see it clearly. Person he punched was committing verbal assault -- which is NOT protected under the First Amendment.
The Patriot responded with language I wouldn't have used -- but his attack was NOT "unprovoked".Thousands have died for less...
Justice was applied.
TXnMA
Harry Callahan : Did you tell them about the meeting?
Capt McKay : What meeting?
Harry Callahan : The meeting right here in your office two months ago when you said high priority was to run these hoods out of San Francisco.
Capt McKay : I never said to use violence.
Harry Callahan : What did you want me to do, yell trick-or-treat at ‘em?
Connecting with Jessie Czebotar (009) Oct 3, 2020
Aquarius Rising Africa — 1.5 hr can listen at 1.5X
“From channel teaser: ...the secret language of the cabal, our recent and current leaders in some telling pictures and we look at the likes of Dr. Phil, Richard Branson, Barack Obama and Ellen de Generes...reminded that Ellen has a gorilla sanctuary in Rwanda, Africa...very disturbing topic of animals and beastiality in this cult...GRAPHIC WARNING : towards the end, we discuss this and some of the horrors that occur.”
***WARNING***SOME DISTURBING TOPICS/CONTENT***
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzy84VEXh2M
Note Czebotar goes over hand signals of the illuminati, as shown in pics of Mandela, Gates, Soros, others. (If interested also see https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2020/03/13/illuminati-signalling-decoded/ ) Also messaging via Mockingbird Project.
2nd half really means we should “WATCH THE WATER”. Maxwell’s Terra Mar Project makes elites citizens of the ocean (for a price), as such they may not fall under criminal statutes when they commit crimes on the high seas or under ocean tunnels (is there a huge one under New Zealand?). Note yachts and submarines. The Maxwell/Epstein stuff is the tip of the iceberg; is Branson Maxwell’s/Epstein’s handler? The kidnapped Jonah (who contains genetic material from the 13 bloodlines) was declared by John F’n Kerry (when SoS) as having no citizenship. Is the citizenship of the ocean how they are trafficking elite children?
Discussion of Ellen’s gorilla sanctuary resulted in Czebotar relaying her observation of beastality, filmed for sale/distribution, on children, who often did not survive.
Note I posted this the other week...http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3885560/posts?page=707#707
These interviews with Czebotar are more detailed than my synopses and are worth a listen, to pull together a big picture. She comes across as quite genuine. In the last weeks she is showing her face on the chats (from originally no image, to photo only, to full vid). She states in the interviews that she has been helping the authorities bring down the cabal, and has been giving more and more details. Methinks much of her work and testimony has already been put into motion.
I think so...the chairs are white and you see the tip behind his shoulder in the first video. The 2nd video is at another angle. But then I’ve read reports that POTUS is on a ship somewhere—LOL!
No.
I Heard some woman on RSBN say
Check houses who have Biden signs
with the National Sex Offender database.
I saw a video clip of a violent attack on someone exhibit A and objected.
Your group member asserted we don't know what was said before hand (Exhibit B) which aparently doesn't matter when claiming it was a justified attack and only matters when defending against the assertion the attack was not justified.
You then asserted there would be more violence for less soon (Exhibit C).
When I asked how this relates to the Q thread, you changed the subject from the video of a man being punched to them wanting "violence post election" and the baffling assertion that the video clip related somehow " because of foreign influence illegal/unprivileged combatants". (Exhibit D)
Your group has already pointed out we don't know what was said before the clip edit and I certainly don't know if that punk got off work early from Starbucks or Target to become a useful idiot for corrupt handlers, or if he benefits from foreign influence and is/is not an unprivileged combatant.
From a punch to unprivileged combatant; I would say here, "That escalated quickly."
I asked if your group could perhaps start their own mobile-goal post thread thinking your group can advocate for violent attacks on punks holding signs and name calling in peace. You said..."No."
You see, that's disappointing, what with the WWG1WGA and me not wanting to join the group you want to introduce into the Q thread and there only being one Q thread 'n all.
In fact, you said other things that don't make sense, like your group doesn't advocate violence. So I saw violence in a video clip being praised and I'm wrong because that wasn't violence? Wasn't praised? In your response, there's mention of LOAC and peaceful transition - none of which was in the video clip I saw being praised. This is generic agitation of broad spectrum accusations and generalized targets. COUNT ME OUT.
Oh, and one more thing. I do live in real life. There are genuine threats beyond this punk, there are threats about transition of power etc. Real threats having nothing to do with praising a video clip of a man punching someone unprovoked.
The Q thread is not the appropriate place for anger mash ups where video clips can be purported to symbolize whatever we want them to mean in moments of frustration.
:: violence post election ::
THIS is what us tough boys are discussing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.