Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: xone

The #hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group. They want violence post election, they’ll get it. They are because of foreign influence illegal/unprivileged combatants, they have ZERO rights to participate in these activities and are afforded NO rights in the ensuing melee. That ma’am is Federal Law.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Could they start their own thread? ‘Cause Q Anon is being falsely portrayed as “dangerous” in the House and MSM and using this thread to support the generalized violence advocated by hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group would needlessly smear the Q Anon peeps.

Q Anon doesn’t advocate violence and is being unfairly censored on the web; we’re lucky we have a home. This is Jim’s house - we can pick up after ourselves and avoid being boorish guests. Why contribute to the false perception being pedaled by Pelosi/MSM?

The violent videos we’ve seen over the past months are psyops on a number of levels and the hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group appears to be taking the bait.

The punk in the linked video clip was treated as a symbolic target- a stand in for other thugs we’ve seen committing violent anarchist crimes elsewhere. But this punk hadn’t actually done anything worth punching. This attack is similar to BLM attacking white drivers as symbols of racism encountered elsewhere committed by other people.

Trump/Q are fighting to instill the rule of law and none of their tactics involved civil war - street violence. None of their strategies involve unprovoked violence against soft targets standing holding signs.


1,327 posted on 10/04/2020 3:31:05 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1312 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote
Could they start their own thread?

No, they advocate no violence, they wish a peaceful transition, but they operate IRL where the same perspective is not shared by the Left. Q has consistently highlighted the consequences of LOAC for those illegally participating in insurrection as did Justice Kavanaugh. Ignoring the consequences of Federal Law doesn't relieve on of those same consequences. Some of us took oaths, those oaths will be upheld lawfully.

1,331 posted on 10/04/2020 3:47:26 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1327 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Harry Callahan : Did you tell them about the meeting?

Capt McKay : What meeting?

Harry Callahan : The meeting right here in your office two months ago when you said high priority was to run these hoods out of San Francisco.

Capt McKay : I never said to use violence.

Harry Callahan : What did you want me to do, yell trick-or-treat at ‘em?


1,333 posted on 10/04/2020 3:51:49 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1327 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

only saw a snippet of a video...16 seconds...guy was yelling turn it off.
turn what off? probably a camera? what happened before the video?

both sides can opine all they want, but there isn’t enough there there to have that discussion


1,387 posted on 10/04/2020 6:02:15 PM PDT by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1327 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson