No, they advocate no violence, they wish a peaceful transition, but they operate IRL where the same perspective is not shared by the Left. Q has consistently highlighted the consequences of LOAC for those illegally participating in insurrection as did Justice Kavanaugh. Ignoring the consequences of Federal Law doesn't relieve on of those same consequences. Some of us took oaths, those oaths will be upheld lawfully.
I saw a video clip of a violent attack on someone exhibit A and objected.
Your group member asserted we don't know what was said before hand (Exhibit B) which aparently doesn't matter when claiming it was a justified attack and only matters when defending against the assertion the attack was not justified.
You then asserted there would be more violence for less soon (Exhibit C).
When I asked how this relates to the Q thread, you changed the subject from the video of a man being punched to them wanting "violence post election" and the baffling assertion that the video clip related somehow " because of foreign influence illegal/unprivileged combatants". (Exhibit D)
Your group has already pointed out we don't know what was said before the clip edit and I certainly don't know if that punk got off work early from Starbucks or Target to become a useful idiot for corrupt handlers, or if he benefits from foreign influence and is/is not an unprivileged combatant.
From a punch to unprivileged combatant; I would say here, "That escalated quickly."
I asked if your group could perhaps start their own mobile-goal post thread thinking your group can advocate for violent attacks on punks holding signs and name calling in peace. You said..."No."
You see, that's disappointing, what with the WWG1WGA and me not wanting to join the group you want to introduce into the Q thread and there only being one Q thread 'n all.
In fact, you said other things that don't make sense, like your group doesn't advocate violence. So I saw violence in a video clip being praised and I'm wrong because that wasn't violence? Wasn't praised? In your response, there's mention of LOAC and peaceful transition - none of which was in the video clip I saw being praised. This is generic agitation of broad spectrum accusations and generalized targets. COUNT ME OUT.
Oh, and one more thing. I do live in real life. There are genuine threats beyond this punk, there are threats about transition of power etc. Real threats having nothing to do with praising a video clip of a man punching someone unprovoked.
The Q thread is not the appropriate place for anger mash ups where video clips can be purported to symbolize whatever we want them to mean in moments of frustration.