[billyboy15]

Personally I believe the President wins re election but if you had to make a choice what would it be.

[dfwgator]

Trump is the President these times demand.

[Lurkinanloomin]

We have to do both, the survival of the nation depends on it.

[central_va]

It’s not an either or situation.

[ConservativeMind]

The President.

Another conservative will become the next Justice. We can’t lose Trump or even that choice will be a liberal.

[cuban leaf]

Going for her placement in the SCOTUS is tempting, but I’ll go with a Trump re-election. It’s simple, really. In his next term he can get her and probably another one. :)

[Regulator]

Trump

Can always get her in after the election if need be

[Governor Dinwiddie]

Long view? Maybe someday after President Trump puts out the fires. Can't afford the luxury of a long view right now; the enemy is at the gate.
 

[right way right]

Both.
You silly goose.

[Wayne07]

If Trump loses, the dems will pack the court, so getting ACB confirmed is meaningless without winning the election.

[Harpotoo]

It’s one and the same!

[llevrok]

The long view is that Donald getting re-elected is most important

If ACB is not confirmed, Donald will have more shots at filling the SCOTUS seat and will also (likely) be able to block the court packing threatened by the Leftists.

If he gets her confirmed but loses, the Supreme Court will be irrelevant as the coup marches on.

[G Larry]

Amy Coney Barrett WILL be seated on the bench, so its not an either/or choice.

Trump's election is imperative for the survival of America.

[a real Sheila]

Re-election

[Stirner]

I think they go together because if there is a growing perception that Trump will probably lose, some Republican senators would go squishy and that would doom ACB.

[freedumb2003]

Both but Barrett has longer lasting implications.

In a sense your question is moot: ACB is going onto SCOTUS. Period.

Trump is more likely than not to win reelection. But it is (sadly for America) not a lock.

[Stravinsky]

There is no evidence that the Barrett nomination is hurting Trump, so this is a dumb question.

But Barrett needs to be on there because there is a real chance of a constitutional crisis coming up the next few months and you don’t want an eight member court with Roberts as swing being the reality when/if that happens.

[Secret Agent Man]

you act as if they are unrelated

given the constitutional crisis coming our way with upcoming election ballot issues

[dp0622]

Go read a book.

You must be as bored as me :)

[bigbob]

The President of course. Ante up.

[datura]

Another Fearper thread? Assemble the GOP circular firing squad, quickly!! Who the f_ck says we can’t have both? You???? I can’t believe the number of pearl clutching FReepers these days. “We need to be more civil.” “We need to not rock the boat so much.” “I wish Trump was more Presidential and didn’t Tweet so many nasty things.” 🤮🤮🤮🤮