Hannity's big problem at the present (besides his cutting in on guests' comments, being long-winded, etc.) is that his night show now consists of stale news - news that viewers have been watching all day long.
His monologues are repetitive, rambling, poorly constructed, full of already-shopworn talking points, boring, tiresome, cliched and too long...and he and his writers and producers are too dumb to pick this up.
Too bad...at his prime Sean's shows were fresh and exciting to watch.
Not now.
Leni
Hannity does more ranting than anything else. Same points. He really doesn’t investigate or uncover anything. He just lets information come to him, then has a corresponding guest on to say a few 2/3 of a sentence about it. Hannity is slow on the uptake - if someone throws a good line at him, he is always caught flat footed. He’s not sharp. He is known to me and mine as Hannitus Interruptus, or Vannity.
Tucker, on the other hand, seems to have a keen sense of justice - digging into something and getting to the core. Telling us who is scamming and why. Tucker also has a sharp sense of humour, and I love his sarcasm.
Agreed. Stop watching him a few years back. Same ole talking points and rarely lets a guest finish their statement. In comparison, Tucker will sit there and let his guests finish.
After Tucker Carlson I can either watch Hannity or clean the cat litter boxes.
I clean the litter boxes every night....
Hannity’s big problem at the present (besides his cutting in on guests’ comments, being long-winded, etc.) is that his night show now consists of stale news - news that viewers have been watching all day long.
His monologues are repetitive, rambling, poorly constructed, full of already-shopworn talking points, boring, tiresome, cliched and too long...and he and his writers and producers are too dumb to pick this up.
—
He’s busy and distracted with Ainsley.
Hi, Minute Gal!
That is true, Leni. Hannity needs 6fresh take on things. Because you’re right; we’ve seen it before, all day long.