Hannity does more ranting than anything else. Same points. He really doesn’t investigate or uncover anything. He just lets information come to him, then has a corresponding guest on to say a few 2/3 of a sentence about it. Hannity is slow on the uptake - if someone throws a good line at him, he is always caught flat footed. He’s not sharp. He is known to me and mine as Hannitus Interruptus, or Vannity.
Tucker, on the other hand, seems to have a keen sense of justice - digging into something and getting to the core. Telling us who is scamming and why. Tucker also has a sharp sense of humour, and I love his sarcasm.
+1