[Keflavik76]

Thanks for the link.
This doesn't pass the smell test:

The interview took place at CIA headquarters and lasted for eight hours, said Nick Shapiro, Brennan’s former deputy chief of staff and senior adviser.

“Brennan was informed by Mr. Durham that he is not a subject or a target of a criminal investigation and that he is only a witness to events that are under review,” Shapiro said in a statement.

[little jeremiah]

Brennan’s underling makes that claim. Yes indeedy.

[greeneyes]

“Brennan was informed by Mr. Durham that he is not a subject or a target of a criminal investigation and that he is only a witness to events that are under review,” Shapiro said in a statement.
********************************************************************************
Yes, and that is kinda what they told DJT. Not a target. Of course he ain’t a target—but he might become a suspect of co-conspiracy.

[mbrfl]

Why would Brennan or Shapiro lie? They know whatever happens is going to happen. If they’re lying, that, presumably, will become apparent in the next month or two. What’s to be gained from lying? I’m not saying they’re not. I just don’t understand the motive.

[grey_whiskers]

If true, Barr swallows.

[bagster]

“Brennan was informed by Mr. Durham that he is not a subject or a target of a criminal investigation and that he is only a witness to events that are under review,” Shapiro said in a statement.

No target, no Miranda.