Q Anon: 08/12/20 Trust Trump's Plan ~ Vol.276, Q Day 1020

qmap.pub ^ | 08/12/20 | FReepers and FReeQs, vanity

[Bigg Red]

I, for one, am glad that they won’t be reading the list of those killed. I find it ghoulish.

[little jeremiah]

Aha, thank you. I went to Reddit some years ago and then everything good seemed to go away. I was thinking centipede.

[MileHi]

Like to see a summary.

[TruthWillWin]

Wonder how she (Tore) stays safe?

Thought I saw somewhere that Twitter banned her account but see she this one current, just followed:

https://mobile.twitter.com/TweetWordz

[stylin19a]

thanx for that. I know there is no “funding” of SS. It’s all I.O.U.a as the payroll tax collected goes into the General Fund.

I’m with you...I never thought it would be there when I got to geezerhood.
Now ? All y’all (and you know who you are) better keep working so I keep getting it.

[little jeremiah]

I was wrong - Sundance’s ravings from yesterday are still there, one just needs to scroll down. I don’t know how to find different blogs/articles or whatever they’re called on TCTH but his twitter crazy talk is still up.

https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2

[TXnMA]

Was "THE QUESTION" asked today?

During POTUS Trump's preses this afternoon, a reporterette (didn't catch her name/affiliation) definitely asked about Q!

Here's what I was able to scrounge from the hokey (Speech-to-Text) closed captioning:

As I heard it, she asked,

"Mr. President, you congratulated Marjorie Taylor Green."

"Green has been a proponent of the Qanon conspiracy theory."

"She said something would be worth listening to."

"Would you agree with her on that?"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SHE ASKED IT TWICE!

Both times, Trump's expression never changed. He acted as if he had heard nothing -- as he turned directly to another questioner...

(Reminder to self: never play poker with 4-10-20 / Q+ / DJT !!) <LOL!!>

Are the media working up to asking "THE QUESTION"?

TXnMA     '-)
  

[little jeremiah]

THere’s a trailer, and then the twitter of the guy involved. I like things simple. I’m too tired right now to spend much time trying to figure it all out. Some kind of psyop weapon.

[meyer]

I see that you saw the trailer/summary, but I’ll say that in my opinion, it ties right in with what Q had been saying from early on - but with more detail on how the government and non-government entities have access to our most personal information from our online travels and activities.

And they use that information to “steer” our behavior. And that it’s being used now to “encourage” riots and such that we are seeing in our cities.

It goes into how information collected by NSA and other agencies is shared not only with other governments (five eyes, perhaps) but also is shared with a non-government entity.

A couple of names pop up in the video - a General Jones for example (national security advisor from 2009 to 2010). It really could have been done in 4 or 5 shorter videos. Lots to take in. I ran it while I was doing other things, so I didn’t absorb nearly enough of it. I also saved it off line a little while ago.

it’s much bigger than I can summarize, and I’ve probably forgotten much more of it than I remember.

[StormFlag]

Ah, watching trailer, that is what I needed, thanks.
——-

You might be interested to know that keystone is mentioned. Seems to be a key to data...

[little jeremiah]

Thanks a lot for the summary info. MileHi, check out meyer’s comment above.

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

So yes, that is how it is supposed to work. Equally enforced and fairly adjudicated.

I will merely wave gently in the direction of DC Circuit/LTG Flynn etc and note that I've been "waiting for the System to work" since '66 or so.

Nothin' personal, but I've long held the entire legal system to be in need of a real good enema.

[Bigg Red]

Well said.

[SaxxonWoods]

I forgot about how they were chosen.

They are supposed to be chosen at random (with exceptions) from your county of residence. The exception where I live is, if you’ve served on a jury in the last 6 months, you are excused until a later date.

Random lottery. But in the case presented, the selection isn’t random. Using social media and other records, people are selected who are likely to have a certain prejudice for or against the crime being tried.

Example for example’s sake: The bad people want a speeder to get off. They pick people for the pool have have griped about tickets and/or cops in general on social media and have problems with driving offenses themselves. They could be more likely to be sympathetic to the defendant. Those people are the ones that get jury notices, and it isn’t random. Will they win them all? No, but it could certainly tilt the scales of justice.

Hope I’m making sense.

[Cats Pajamas]

https://mobile.twitter.com/carterwpage

https://mobile.twitter.com/carterwpage/status/1293566749510688769

[M. Thatcher]

Sundance’s ravings from yesterday are still there, one just needs to scroll down

I wish I could see them, but Sundance blocked me some time ago. (I put up an image of Eyore in response to one of his woe tweets LOL)

Oh well.

[christianbasque]

Concerns come from waiting for justice
since the Rose Law firm days

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That was the Bad Old Days.
There’s a new sheriff in town now.
************************
How true that is.

[Miss Didi]

Just posted CNN article BTT:

QAnon is conspiratorial, dangerous, and growing. And we're talking about it all wrong.

[VRWCarea51]

#1417 wow! iia

https://youtu.be/9HFxVvrXjCg

[M. Thatcher]

She seems spot on.

Exactly. Are her comments supposed to be some kind of a problem?