Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses
SOTT Signs Of The Times ^ | April 20, 2020 | Dr. Denis G Rancourt, PhD

Posted on 06/26/2020 8:50:20 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge

(excerpt copied from this article)

Conclusion regarding masks that do not work

No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions. Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public (more on this below).

Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit. Masks and respirators do not work.

Precautionary Principle turned on its head with masks

In light of the medical research, therefore, it is difficult to understand why public-health authorities are not consistently adamant about this established scientific result, since the distributed psychological, economic and environmental harm from a broad recommendation to wear masks is significant, not to mention the unknown potential harm from concentration and distribution of pathogens on and from used masks.

Physics and Biology of Viral Respiratory Disease, and why masks do not work

In this case, public authorities would be turning the precautionary principle on its head.

(Excerpt) Read more at sott.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: april2020; coronavirus; government; masks; oldnews; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 next last
To: exDemMom

“And what is the population density of South Dakota?”

It’s every bit as dense as any other town.


161 posted on 06/27/2020 10:02:43 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

cotton is absorbent u til it is saturated by moisture from your breath. about 20 minutes. Not that any breathable material protects from the virus anyway


162 posted on 06/27/2020 10:03:45 AM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge

Who determines that the virus is contained in 1 um aerosols? If they are in that size, I would expect they would evaporate almost instantly. When the outer coating of water vapor goes, so does the virus.


163 posted on 06/27/2020 10:18:27 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

- When the outer coating of water vapor goes, so does the virus.-

Where do you get that information?


164 posted on 06/27/2020 10:47:13 AM PDT by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Western Phil

Look it up.


165 posted on 06/27/2020 11:31:33 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge

Mark


166 posted on 06/27/2020 11:48:33 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Thanks, Jane. I guess I misinterpreted your reply, sorry.


167 posted on 06/27/2020 5:09:18 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
I'm a far left crazy?

I just don't trust people; I know there's tens of thousands of George Floyds out there, who know they're COVID-19 positive and are out and about anyway.

Had to do a pickup at the mall, some idiot who probably thought a face diaper was uncool turned and sneezed on me. Gee, thanks, bad enough being an essential worker, but you gotta do that too?

Friends made her finally put on a mask afterward. Always a smooth move after sneezing on a federal employee.

So, you know, you're welcome to ride your high horse on off into the sunset. Don't want to wear a face diaper, think they're useless, then stay the hell away from others and out of public spaces.

To be clear, rioters & looters and their cover decoys, the ‘peaceful protesters’ who aren't actually protesting anything, just making noise, who aren't wearing masks and aren't social distancing are total jerks. I'd be the guy who'd get arrested for running them over and you'd better believe I'd be going before a jury claiming I wasn't going to be held hostage against my will.

Anyone enabling those 'peaceful protesters' who simultaneously condemned people for protesting effective house arrest for the majority of the population without conviction are also jerks.

That would be by default pretty much every liberal out there.

168 posted on 06/27/2020 5:45:13 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerosol

indicates virus aerosol droplets could be as small as 1 μm. The size of the Covid-19 virus itself has been reported as 0.125 μm.

I don't know if anyone has indicated this virus is contained in 1 um aerosols, only that aerosol droplets could be as small as 1 μm.

The SOTT article referenced in this thread indicates the aerosol particles are less than 2.5 μm.

169 posted on 06/27/2020 7:52:41 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

Good reply. You win!


170 posted on 06/27/2020 7:54:06 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge
Does anyone know how long the aerosol droplets in the μm range last before they evaporate? Once the aerosol outer coating evaporates, the virus degrades and can no longer enter the ACE-2 receptor.
171 posted on 06/27/2020 9:22:38 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
Buried deep in the SOTT article under the heading

Physics and Biology of Viral Respiratory Disease, and why masks do not work

is this statement:
"On average, 64 per cent of the viral genome copies were associated with fine particles smaller than 2.5 µm, which can remain suspended for hours."

And I read somewhere else (but can't find it now) that aerosol viruses can remain viable as long as 16 hours in enclosed spaces.

172 posted on 06/27/2020 10:33:08 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge
Another opinion, from Sweden:

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/05/17/swedish-health-officials-face-masks-do-not-provide-any-greater-protection-to-the-population-922232

173 posted on 06/27/2020 10:38:53 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
Sadly, I must point out that the mask will NOT protect others, any more than it protects you, for exactly the same reasons.

If you are infected and contagious the mask will not make you safe to be around.

Any aerosol virus you exhale will go out through your mask just as easily as it can come in, so the mask might slow the exposure a little, but it will NOT stop it.

174 posted on 06/27/2020 11:49:07 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/oxygen-test-while-wearing-mask/


175 posted on 06/28/2020 12:36:02 AM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
Does anyone know how long the aerosol droplets in the μm range last before they evaporate? Once the aerosol outer coating evaporates, the virus degrades and can no longer enter the ACE-2 receptor.

A few days ago, I read a paper that stated that droplets evaporated by 95% in less than a second (I want to say 1/24 of a second) in a room at 50% humidity.

Clearly, ambient temperature and humidity are going to affect evaporation and virus survival rates.

Another paper said that viruses do not survive very long on the hands, I think it was only a few seconds.

I have read many papers, but unfortunately forget to bookmark them. I will look for the paper that discusses the evaporation rates and post a link if I find it.

Yesterday, I found three papers in which the efficacy of face masks in the context of Covid-19 was evaluated. Yep, the data actually shows that face masks, as well as social distancing and eye protection, work to reduce spread of Covid-19. The blog excerpted at the top of this thread was written by a physicist who has zero experience in infectious diseases. Two of the studies of mask efficacy were written by people in the field (MDs, PhDs, MPHs, MSs); the other was written by economists and statisticians but their references appear to be valid. I did bookmark these papers.

176 posted on 06/28/2020 4:13:13 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge
If you are infected and contagious the mask will not make you safe to be around.

Any aerosol virus you exhale will go out through your mask just as easily as it can come in, so the mask might slow the exposure a little, but it will NOT stop it.

Actually, I found three review papers that specifically address the question of how masks affect transmissibility of Covid-19. All of them concluded that masks inhibit transmission of Covid-19.

Also, I found another paper about the survivability of viruses in different environments. One limitation of this paper was that most of the studies were looking for viral RNA remaining in the environment, but the presence of RNA is not an indicator of infectivity. The following passage from that paper, Stability and infectivity of coronaviruses in inanimate environments leapt out at me:

Infectivity of HuCoV- 229E was undetectable after drying on aluminum, sterile latex surgical gloves, and sterile cotton gauze sponges at RT for 3 h; HuCoV OC43 survived 1 h or less[34]. Contaminated droplets will be absorbed faster on cotton materials than on fluid-repellent materials, and cotton gowns offer protection against droplets bearing viruses. Droplets or fomites that persist on a nonabsorbent disposable gown or gloves may be a risk to contaminate the environment.

SARS-CoV strain GVU6109 was isolated from a lung tissue specimen of a SARS patient during the SARS outbreak in 2003[35]; its infectivity at 10^4 tissue culture infection doses (TCID50)/mL vanished within 5 min after drying on paper or a cotton gown at RT[35], showing that the viral infectivity perished faster on the cotton gown than on an impervious surface (e.g., the disposable gown) (5 min vs 60 min at 10^4 TCID50/mL, 1 h vs 24 h at 10^5 TCID50/mL )[35].

Note: these studies used commonly circulating coronaviruses; the behavior of the Covid-19 virus should be similar.

In other words, the cotton material used in masks helps to dry (and kill) the virus quickly. This is nice to know, since I just ordered 8 yards of pure cotton cloth to use to make masks.

177 posted on 06/28/2020 4:37:22 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
Here, I found the paper I referred to in my last post:

Dynamics of infectious disease transmission by inhalable respiratory droplets

And the relevant passage: "Evaporation, being a molecular process, is very fast (Nicas et al. 2005; Morawska 2006); for example, a 20 µm droplet evaporates to a 1 µm diameter droplet within 0.24 s−1 (at 50% ambient relative humidity). Henceforth, we neglect droplet evaporation, and we follow Nicas et al. (2005) to take the post-evaporation diameter (approximately) half the pre-evaporation diameter."

178 posted on 06/28/2020 4:48:35 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
cotton is absorbent u til it is saturated by moisture from your breath. about 20 minutes. Not that any breathable material protects from the virus anyway

I have never worn a surgical or cloth mask that became saturated, no matter how long I wore it. In any case, even if they become damp, water has a wonderful property of sticking to itself. Therefore, even a damp mask would attract any droplets containing virus. And if a mask became so wet that breathing became even more difficult than it normally is while wearing a mask, I suspect that most people would change it out.

Oh, and here are three papers that specifically address the question of mask efficacy in reducing the spread of Covid-19:

SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Serologic Responses from a Sample of U.S. Navy Service Members — USS Theodore Roosevelt, April 2020 [From the CDC's weekly publication, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. And I know one of the authors.]

Face Masks Considerably Reduce COVID-19 Cases in Germany: A Synthetic Control Method Approach [Written by three economists and a statistician; however, their reference list looks solid.]

Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Published in The Lancet; most of the MD and MPH/MS authors are affiliated with Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.]

All of these reviews concluded that masks (and social distancing and eye protection) are effective to reduce the spread of Coronavirus.

In addition, on the survivability of virus in different environments, I found this review: Stability and infectivity of coronaviruses in inanimate environments. Now, most of the studies examined in this review only looked for the presence of viral RNA in the environment, which tells nothing about whether there are infective particles in the environment. However, what that paper had to say about the survivability of virus on absorbent vs. non-absorbent surfaces was very interesting:

Infectivity of HuCoV- 229E was undetectable after drying on aluminum, sterile latex surgical gloves, and sterile cotton gauze sponges at RT for 3 h; HuCoV OC43 survived 1 h or less[34]. Contaminated droplets will be absorbed faster on cotton materials than on fluid-repellent materials, and cotton gowns offer protection against droplets bearing viruses. Droplets or fomites that persist on a nonabsorbent disposable gown or gloves may be a risk to contaminate the environment.

SARS-CoV strain GVU6109 was isolated from a lung tissue specimen of a SARS patient during the SARS outbreak in 2003[35]; its infectivity at 10^4 tissue culture infection doses (TCID50)/mL vanished within 5 min after drying on paper or a cotton gown at RT[35], showing that the viral infectivity perished faster on the cotton gown than on an impervious surface (e.g., the disposable gown) (5 min vs 60 min at 10^4 TCID50/mL, 1 h vs 24 h at 10^5 TCID50/mL )[35].

So it actually looks like cotton is the best choice for reducing virus spread.

But, don't tell me, I already know: what can a bunch of researchers who actually examine data and evidence possibly know about the real world?

179 posted on 06/28/2020 5:43:47 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

I have seen similar reports on droplets holding covid. I don’t have the time to find them again. Thanks for your good info.


180 posted on 06/28/2020 6:15:07 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson