Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jonrick46
Here, I found the paper I referred to in my last post:

Dynamics of infectious disease transmission by inhalable respiratory droplets

And the relevant passage: "Evaporation, being a molecular process, is very fast (Nicas et al. 2005; Morawska 2006); for example, a 20 µm droplet evaporates to a 1 µm diameter droplet within 0.24 s−1 (at 50% ambient relative humidity). Henceforth, we neglect droplet evaporation, and we follow Nicas et al. (2005) to take the post-evaporation diameter (approximately) half the pre-evaporation diameter."

178 posted on 06/28/2020 4:48:35 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom; jonrick46
Dynamics of infectious disease transmission by inhalable respiratory droplets

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2894888/

Oh! How easy it is to confuse!

Start with your claim in post 176: "A few days ago, I read a paper that stated that droplets evaporated by 95% in less than a second (I want to say 1/24 of a second) in a room at 50% humidity."

And the relevant passage (in post 178): "Evaporation, being a molecular process, is very fast (Nicas et al. 2005; Morawska 2006); for example, a 20 µm droplet evaporates to a 1 µm diameter droplet within 0.24 s−1 (at 50% ambient relative humidity). Henceforth, we neglect droplet evaporation, and we follow Nicas et al. (2005) to take the post-evaporation diameter (approximately) half the pre-evaporation diameter."

First: This "example evaporation" formula applies to a 20 µm droplet, which by other discussions in this referenced article would fall to the ground in about 8 seconds. and is NOT oconsidered an "airborn" droplet that would be encountered with a mask. (The Covid-19 airborn aerosol droplets discussed in this thread are less than 2.5 µm droplets)

Second: More importantly, you clearly misinterpret the mathematical formula "0.24 s-1". You have no idea what "0.24 s-1" means in this formula. It certainly does NOT mean 0.24 seconds.

187 posted on 06/28/2020 3:07:22 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson