(h/t HoneysuckleTN)
What? You mean Creepy Uncle Joe isn’t really up by 10 points?
Shocking.
Trump hired McLaughlin & Associates, to analyze biased media polling. Reed their report.
twitter ^ | June 8, 2020 | President Trump, , McLaughlin & Associates
Posted on 6/8/2020, 1:33:54 PM by ransomnote
Didn’t need any analysis. This was an obvious hit job poll that doesn’t even come close to reality.
I don’t know how to reed. . .
I think you mean “Reed THERE report.” /s
What decent person is going to share their political opinions with a stranger on an unsolicited call? Imagine many republicans don’t answer or hang up on these callers. Pollsters are treated like spam.
Truck the polls, Truck an analysis. Mr. President, you don’t need me to say this, but I will anyway:
Now that it is OK to have mass protests and demonstrations, schedule a rally or twenty ASAP!!! Let’s show these a-hats what a really spontaneous uprising looks like.
MAGA!!!
So CNN “poll”
Only 25% Republicans
And polled adults, not even registered voters let alone likely voters.
Way to go CNN
Chuckle.
I’ve been saying this so long that I no longer even bother to tear apart the internals of the polls, I just assume they use one or more of many established methods of rigging the headline results. Occasionally I check to confirm and it always remains true.
Just heard Trump rallies starting up again!!! WooHoo!!!
Leading up to the 2016 election, I was fairly confident of a Trump victory. I just took the predictions of a Clinton landslide, down-adjusted for their consistent demographic biases and the rational silence of deplorables, but up-adjusted to account for the fraud vote. The pollsters seem to prefer to twist reality rather then just fabricating it from thin air.
I would prefer they wrote analytically rather than adversarial.
Bookmark
If they’re going to intentionally skew the polls, why even poll at all? The final product is fake and worthless; so why not just sit at their desk, pull the desired numbers out of some unsanitary bodily orifice and publish them? That, in effect, is what they’ve been doing anyway.
This was the explanation for McCain’s and Romney’s poor polling numbers before the elections of 2008 and 2012. In both cases, experts like Karl Rove predicted GOP victories, and that the polls were under sampling Reps. The polls countered that when they created their universes, fewer people identified as Republicans, hence the “underrepresentation”. In those elections, the polls were correct.
These polls probable reflect the same thing. Also, the polls have never measured Trump accurately. Trump is down at the moment, altho probably not as much as indicated. Things will hopefully change when the riots are behind us, and Biden comes out of hiding and shows what a buffoon he is.
Man, I can't watch that video enough times!
SeeBS reported on their “news” tonight that President Trump’s poll numbers slipped from 45 positive to 38 positive.
And they claimed that Biden is leading the president by 14 points nationally.
Sure....and Marilyn Monroe was a virgin when she died.
If they are under sampling Republicans by 7%, I’ll assume they over sampled Democrats by the same 7%. Therefore, add 7 points to Trump’s totals, and subtract 7 points from Biden’s totals for a net difference of 14 points. Then there needs to be an adjustment for not polling “likely” voters (which would favor Trump).