The fact that a Navy jet was able to lock an air-to-air missile on the object means it was something real, right?
1 posted on
05/14/2020 4:51:39 AM PDT by
C19fan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: All
I do not see locking an air-to-air missile on an alien craft is in the first contact protocol, hee hee.
2 posted on
05/14/2020 4:52:37 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: C19fan
Some pilots have said that “some” of the east coast sightings appear to be drones of some kind and quite different than what was encountered by the USS Nimitz in the San Diego area. Don’t have a source link for this.
To: Fred Nerks
The mystery of US Military reports continues.
I here I thought that flying suitcases were the province of Terry Pratchett novels about Anhkpomork and the Great Turtle that supports disc-world.
If you happen to fly in the near future, keep your eyes peeled for a flying suitcase. US military pilots cannot be wrong.
4 posted on
05/14/2020 5:01:23 AM PDT by
Candor7
(Obama fascism:)
To: C19fan
Good thing pilot didnt pull the trigger
5 posted on
05/14/2020 5:05:03 AM PDT by
no-to-illegals
( Liberals, leftists, Rinos, moslems, illegals, lamestream media. All want America to fail and die)
To: C19fan
It is bizarre that a UK paper creates titles like “REVEALED: Navy fighter jets” considering it's not their Navy.
7 posted on
05/14/2020 5:07:13 AM PDT by
Vision
(Obama corrupted, sought to weaken and fundamentally change America; he didn't plan on being stopped.)
To: C19fan
The fact that a Navy jet was able to lock an air-to-air missile on the object means it was something real, right? Might want to take a close look at the systems and who wrote the software.
9 posted on
05/14/2020 5:12:21 AM PDT by
fso301
To: C19fan
10 posted on
05/14/2020 5:13:29 AM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: C19fan
It means the sensor thought it was real, yes.
And if there is visual confirmation with the human eye, its obviously not a sensor problem, and that is generally required to permit locking of middles depending on ROE. But maybe not.
So there is probably a real object present, if point 2 above is correct.
11 posted on
05/14/2020 5:15:01 AM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
To: C19fan
If it bleeds we can kill it.
12 posted on
05/14/2020 5:15:41 AM PDT by
bramps
(It's the Islam, stupid!)
To: C19fan
*technically* if the MISSILE locked on (while still on the rail) then the object had a strong enough heat signature in the right wavelengths. (Sidewinder)
If the plane’s RADAR locked on then the object had enough effective surface area to return an RF echo. (AIM 7)
But yes. If one of the various weapons systems locked on, the object existed.
15 posted on
05/14/2020 5:21:54 AM PDT by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: C19fan
Anyone can tell be reading the article it was a weather balloon with a packed bag on vacation. The fact there was a near collision just means the balloon had too much to drink.
To: C19fan
No sir. SAR sometimes have a false return. Ive locked ghost
returns a few times.
31 posted on
05/14/2020 5:46:18 AM PDT by
Hulka
To: C19fan
The fact that a Navy jet was able to lock an air-to-air missile on the object means it was something real, right? Either real, or an extremely sophisticated electronic warfare countermeasure spoofing a real target. I doubt the latter.
38 posted on
05/14/2020 6:04:45 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: C19fan
Drones. He locked on with a heat-seeker
40 posted on
05/14/2020 6:08:39 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
To: C19fan
My dad tells of sitting around a campfire late one night during the Apollo 12 training days and hearing Pete Conrad talk about when he was testing some new airplane and the base he was flying out of had to shut down because something no-one had ever seen landed on the end of the runway.
44 posted on
05/14/2020 6:21:50 AM PDT by
Clay Moore
(Mega prayers, Rush)
To: C19fan
It also means it can be shot down.
Hardly ET stuff.
45 posted on
05/14/2020 6:23:41 AM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
To: C19fan
51 posted on
05/14/2020 6:48:04 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: C19fan
The Navy pilots will escape probing by aliens this time since the objects were likely U.S. Air Force drones.
They might be part of the new Space Force.
To: C19fan
I thought that the use of LSD was a violation of the UCMJ...
64 posted on
05/14/2020 8:11:24 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(The Rats Just Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election!)
To: C19fan; Jewbacca; Blueflag; real saxophonist; fso301; DiogenesLamp; V_TWIN; PIF; LS; ...
Several of you draw the inevitable conclusion that these objects are
real, but understandably you are puzzled at their origin: alien? USAF? Mirage?
There is another, more likely explanation, one that has repeated scientific documentation in many similar incidents: real but not physical. That is, they are probably fallen angels--demons--who are visiting our realm. For details, please see Lights In the Sky & Little Green Men: A Rational Christian Look at UFOs and Extraterrestrials, by astrophysicist and longtime UFO analyst Dr. Hugh Ross.
72 posted on
05/14/2020 10:03:29 AM PDT by
Hebrews 11:6
(Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson