Posted on 05/12/2020 6:29:57 PM PDT by ransomnote
Remember...
HRC was a “Watergate Prosecutor”.
At least, her resume says that.
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Our Testing is the BEST in the World, by FAR! Numbers are coming down in most parts of our Country, which wants to open and get going again. It is happening, safely!
78.3K 6:35 AM - May 12, 2020
O T BEST W FAR N C I = (no comment on a particular order) SCATTER FBI NOW
“Former Whitewater Prosecuters” amicus re: Flynn
https://www.scribd.com/document/461240365/Watergate-prosecutors-notice-to-file-brief#from_embed
The Watergate Prosecutors are: Nick Akerman, Richard Ben-Veniste, Richard J. Davis, Carl B.Feldbaum, George T. Frampton, Jr., Kenneth S. Geller, Gerald Goldman, Stephen E. Haberfeld,Henry L. Hecht, Paul R. Hoeber, Philip Allen Lacovara, Paul R. Michel, Robert L. Palmer, FrankTuerkheimer, Jill Wine-Banks, and Roger Witten.
He's doing good work -
Do we know what the dates correspond to?
Date of request?
Date of communication, Flynn/Kysliak?
Both?
Date of request fulfilment?
Dates are important.
-h/t Q
4231
Dates are important.
FISA unmask request(s) [PRIOR TO] Amb. Kislyak phone call?
WHO ASKED AMB. KISLYAK TO CALL FLYNN [SET UP _FBI entrap + FISA [late] justify]?
Q
“Do we know what the dates correspond to?
Date of request?
Date of communication, Flynn/Kysliak?
Both?”
My guess (for what it’s worth) is that these are request dates, but I have no sauce to back that up. The first sentence in the doc says they are in response to a request processed between 8 November 2016 and 31 Jan 2017
I’m glad “Q” pointed this out - because it’s the first of the lib’s talking points ... the phone call did NOT take place until weeks after Hussein set it all up with these unmaskings on 12/14-12/15
Although I didn’t intend to imply that HRC would be among the petitioners, I can guaran-dang-tee you she is “financially friendly” with some if not all of those people.
And, she was a member of the prosecution team until she was fired by the Lead for being...a sleazy lawyer.
Got it, but still...why would the Treasury Secretary (Jacob Law) need to know about General Flynn? Nobody (other than his BOSS) is going to tell the SecTreas to ask for the unmasking, but what’s the relevance to Treasury?
And why would the Secretary of the Treasury direct FIVE of his direct reports to do the same? This sounds like a team assignment, but why separate requests instead of just sharing the information between themselves?
And of course the names that are redacted but yet the titles of the person remain are odd. Couldn’t anyone with access to government records come up with the names of persons who held those positions at that time?
The dog that didn’t bark - on 12/28 - 12/29 ... except for Clapper, they were NOT unmasking.
Maybe Misprision of Treason? If she found out what they were doing and said nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
