Posted on 05/12/2020 6:29:57 PM PDT by ransomnote
> IS IT A SURE WIN?
That’s a good question. Test race?
-SB
> Praying for you, Snowy. May God richly bless you!
Thank you! Every bit helps! I’m really praying I land this one. I’ll post an update when it comes.
-SB
I may have erred...
I want everyone to know I’m not suicidal...
I wasn’t thinking...
I should have realized this would also go to the new
Master Gater himself... B. Obummer.
https://twitter.com/easystreet4/status/1260438003593420801
Avenge me!
;-)
~Easy
“And yes. Ima gunna have to steal that meme. I have no Fu creating my own.”
Help yourself!
(I pre-stole it for you...)
~Easy
I’m going to need some eye bleach...
“That’s a man baby!”
Welcome.
There are a lot of people that think Sullivan is deep state. Here is a link to a thread by a friend of Sidney Powell, who would disagree with that conclusion. It fits in better with my idea of what Sullivan is like...
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1260338618025066498.html?refreshed=1589324303
Could be that Sullivan isn’t so much corrupt as he is blackmailed.
-——————————————————————————————or perhaps neither:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1260338618025066498.html?refreshed=1589324303
I can’t tell if anyone else is using the #Tyrannogasm
hashtag.
When I search on it, I can only see all the stuff I
tweeted using it.
(There’s a lot...)
Maybe you have to Tweet a Tweet using that hashtag to
get access to the contents... ;-)
~Easy
+1
Here, I asked some friends to help out with the beer...
Interesting article, but the author’s argument is not that persuasive to me because the question of whether Sullivan was fair or unfair with Flynn in the past is largely immaterial to the current situation. The idea that Sullivan’s using the Amicus Brief request to expose Van Grack and his cohorts is not credible IMO. If Sullivan’s aim is to effect justice in the most direct way, there’s no need for a big PR stunt to expose the prosecutorial over reach. Simply dismissing the case would be the most direct way of exposing it. Even assuming Sullivan is looking for real justice here, there’s just nothing to be gained by drawing this out to make a point, and it’s not his place to do so anyway.
#186 that’s quite the Adams apple she’s sporting
Aaaand howwwww.
WTH is up with these derps trying to cover up their spouses gender.
This broad, big mike. Etc. spit.
You may be right, but Q has stated that they will try to remove Barr now, and if he forces those who file an amicus brief to defend that brief in his court, and he demolishes their argument, and those are later picked to testify at an impeachment hearing, he may be helping. He seemed to know that they wanted to stretch this out all along. They may need a little longer until Durham is ready. We will see...
creating your own trending hashtag is difficult unless you have a lot of followers engaged. Try using it in combo with a trending hashtag. Right now #redwave is trending.
FYI - Judge Sullivan cites Amy Berman Jackson of the Stone lynching.. Yikes. Then again, if the DOJ can use this to expose a corrupt judiciary? So be it. pic.twitter.com/KVh1q6mkpT— OKC Guy (@okclivinrob) May 12, 2020
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.