Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Medical ‘Chickenpox Parties’ Could Turn The Tide Of The Wuhan Virus: Consider a somewhat unconventional approach -- controlled voluntary infection.
The Federalist ^ | 03/26/2020 | By Douglas A. Perednia

Posted on 03/26/2020 7:53:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

By now, we all know America’s immediate COVID-19 action plan is to avoid rapid spread of the virus through good hygiene and isolation. The logic of this mitigation strategy is quite sound. As Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly explained, this approach will buy us time and flatten the curve of the national infection rate.

Both of these steps are needed because intensive care unit (ICU) resources are essential to managing the disease in older and sicker patients, but are inherently expensive and finite. We cannot afford to overwhelm them.

The problem with mitigation is that it is entirely defensive; it does little to make the country safe for a return to widespread social and economic activity. If and when social isolation and quarantine measures relax, coronavirus infection rates will rise in tandem.

The Imperial College has modeled the effect of imposing four interventions — social distancing of the entire population, case isolation, household quarantine, and school and university closure — then relaxing them periodically to allow daily life and economic activity to partially recover. They found, “Once interventions are relaxed … infections begin to rise, resulting in a predicted peak epidemic later in the year. The more successful a strategy is at temporary suppression, the larger the later epidemic is predicted to be in the absence of vaccination, due to lesser build-up of herd immunity.”

In other words, a mitigation strategy based on shutting down the economy is like asking society to hold its breath to keep from inhaling a toxin. It can’t keep up forever, and when it does breathe, all that gasping for air is going to undo much of the benefit we’d hoped to derive.

The alternative to mitigation is active suppression of the disease. The conventional approach for suppressing epidemics is the development of: 1) an effective vaccine and 2) drugs that could be used to reduce the severity. Despite record-time development of potential vaccines and the beginning of Phase I clinical trials, we are not likely to have a coronavirus vaccine widely available until at least mid- to late-2021. We can certainly hope effective drug therapies become available in that time, but there are certainly no guarantees.

Neither mitigation nor waiting for a vaccine is acceptable given the magnitude of the problem we are facing. Economies are like a living organism — as soon as their normal functions are shut down, they begin to die. Savings, capital, income, and taxes all evaporate. Companies begin to close, and many will not have the resources to begin again. Massive deficits will become a huge burden for future generations. Meanwhile, the regular health care system is all but shut down.

It is time to think outside the box and seriously consider a third, somewhat unconventional alternative: controlled voluntary infection (CVI).

What Is Controlled Voluntary Infection?

CVI involves allowing people at low risk for severe complications to deliberately contract COVID-19 in a socially and medically responsible way so they become immune to the disease. People who are immune cannot pass on the disease to others.

If CVI were to become widespread and successful, it could be a powerful tool for both suppressing the Wuhan coronavirus and saving the economy. It could reduce the danger of passing COVID-19 to vulnerable populations, drastically reduce the amount of social isolation needed, reopen businesses, and even help achieve the level of “herd immunity” needed to stop the spread of the disease within the population.

Herd immunity, of course, is the phenomenon whereby contagious infections can no longer spread if a large enough percentage of the population is immune to the disease, and CVI is a means to achieve it. Many over the age of 60 might remember an interesting historical precedent for CVI: chickenpox parties.

Before vaccinations for childhood diseases such as chickenpox and German measles were developed, families would hold chickenpox or German measles “parties” when one child contracted the disease. All the neighborhood children were invited to play with the infected child with the understanding that they would probably become infected as a result. The entire community would get the disease out of the way in one little local epidemic. Since many childhood diseases are far more severe if contracted as an adult, voluntary infection minimized the potential for future adverse consequences.

CVI for COVID-19 is based upon a unique characteristic of the Wuhan virus: Its infections are known to be clinically mild in much of the population, specifically healthy young people — even to the point of being asymptomatic. According to data collected from the National Health Institute in Italy and a recent article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the mortality rate for the disease is 0 percent in patients 0 to 29 years old. Mortality then begins to increase with age and with underlying defects in respiratory function or certain other disease conditions. See Table 1.

Table 1: Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in Relation to COVID-19 in Italy.

alt

There are exceptions, of course. According to a recently published study in the journal Pediatrics of 2,143 pediatric patients from China with confirmed or suspected cases of the Wuhan virus, one child died (0.05 percent). This is an order of magnitude lower than estimated mortality for the population as a whole.

The same study found that 10.6 percent of children under 1 year old experienced severe or critical symptoms, as did 7.3 percent of patients from 1 to 5 years old. The rate of severe illness then began to decrease with age; only about 3 percent of children 15 years old or older became seriously ill. Overall, the study found the rates of both serious disease and death in children to be far lower than the comparable rates in adults.

Table 2 shows the U.S. experience with pediatric and older patients through March 16, 2020. No childhood fatalities have been recorded in the United States thus far. While the incidents of hospitalization and ICU care in those aged 20 to 44 are significantly higher than those under age 19, incidents of mortality are still very low compared to those 45 and older.

Table 2: Severe Outcomes Among U.S. Patients with COVID-19 — Feb. 12 – March 16, 2020

alt

This data shows that although there is clearly a risk associated with having younger people exposed to COVID-19, it is a risk many people might rationally decide to take. Under mitigation alone, millions of Americans will be infected with the Wuhan coronavirus one way or another. There may be considerable value in keeping careful track of who has and has not had COVID-19, and allowing people at low risk to decide whether, when, where, and how they contract the disease.

How Would CVI Work?

The basic principles are simple:

The potential benefits of a successful CVI program are considerable:

Math tells us how many people need to be exposed to an illness or vaccine before herd immunity develops in the community. Crunching data from the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis at Imperial College London implies that based on the Wuhan virus’s reproduction number, we can achieve herd immunity by immunizing somewhere between 33.3 to 71.4 percent of the population, with an averaged guess of 61.5 percent. Given the age demographic breakdown of the population, there is a good chance a safe and responsible CVI could get us close to herd immunity months before a vaccine makes 100 percent immunization possible.

Potential Limits of This Approach

The potential limitations of selective infection fall into two main categories. The first is scientific. Can we produce large numbers of reliable tests that will allow us to document individual virus immunity? The answer will be “yes.” Considerable progress has already been made toward this goal.

How persistent and reliable is the immunity that develops? Does immunity to one strain of the virus confer immunity on other known strains? Is it possible for patients who have recovered from COVID-19 to be re-infected? What is the most efficient way to safely set up and operate CVI venues? These questions should all be answerable within a relatively short period of time.

The second category is social. Does a society like ours allow people the freedom to participate in CVI programs? How do we deal with potential liability issues? Will we allow parents to make these sorts of infection decisions for both themselves and their children? Are there people who should not be allowed to participate because of age or pre-existing conditions?

If people are willing to risk deliberate infection for the sake of themselves and the greater good, should the government, and therefore taxpayers, cover any medical and hospitalization costs they may incur in the process? It is quite possible the answers to such questions might differ in various countries or even parts of a given country. Fortunately the CVI approach is amenable to implementation on any level, from communities to cities, regions, or an entire nation.

This type of controlled infection program would be unprecedented, but so is a disease with the unique clinical characteristics of COVID-19. Unfortunately, the status quo itself is hardly a safe, certain, or risk-free course of action. If the Wuhan virus pandemic is the moral and medical equivalent of war, this is exactly the sort of crash project that could save the day for millions of Americans, jobs, and future generations who will bear much of the cost of this disease.


Douglas Perednia is a physician in Portland, Oregon. He is the author of "Overhauling America’s Healthcare Machine."


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; History; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: anthonyfauci; chickenpox; coronavirus; covid19; infection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 03/26/2020 7:53:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

until the long-term effects of the virus are known, this is dangerously irresponsible


2 posted on 03/26/2020 7:59:50 AM PDT by thoughtomator (... this has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Sounds like a NeverTrumper or other Democrat who's trying to worsen the problem, same goes for the toilet seat licking "influencers".

3 posted on 03/26/2020 8:03:22 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If you test positive but are asymptomatic how long are you capable of reading the virus, weeks days forever ??


4 posted on 03/26/2020 8:03:27 AM PDT by Bell Bouy II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I firmly believe that in Eastern King County Washington where we live surrounded by half a million recent Chinese immigrants many of whom visit home frequently, that this virus was making the rounds even before it was identified in China. It is highly contagious and when antibody tests are finally made available they will show that nearly everyone either had it or had an exposure that caused them to develop antibodies.
5 posted on 03/26/2020 8:03:36 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bell Bouy II

“reading the virus, weeks days forever ??”

spreading the virus


6 posted on 03/26/2020 8:04:34 AM PDT by Bell Bouy II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

This program should be mandatory for every justflubro make everyone of them put their lives and money where their mouths are. Also anyone who breaks a stay at home order should also be mandatory infected as well. This will.serve two purposes one to make damn clear stay at home means stay at home, and it will.silence all the moronic butflubros.


7 posted on 03/26/2020 8:06:25 AM PDT by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

I think the same thing. A nasty flu went through New Hampshire starting in December.


8 posted on 03/26/2020 8:08:32 AM PDT by BillyCuccio (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Where we live, the question isn't whether you are going to get it, but if that cough you had earlier in the year was it. When antibody tests are finally used they will determine that at least in certain areas the virus was being passed around for months in some areas and that its lethality and the strain it was projected to cause on the health-care system was highly exaggerated.
9 posted on 03/26/2020 8:09:01 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Now that takes me back. I was born in 1958, and I do remember when I was a kid that if some kid in the neighborhood had the German Measles, the other parents would sent their daughters over to play. The idea being that better to get it over with now than take a chance on them getting it during child bearing age. I did not realize that they did this with chickenpox as well.


10 posted on 03/26/2020 8:10:05 AM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"They found, “Once interventions are relaxed … infections begin to rise, resulting in a predicted peak epidemic later in the year."

That was the break in logic again. Warm weather kills the other coronaviruses including the first SARS. He could have quacked out his presentation without that canard.

11 posted on 03/26/2020 8:10:12 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

-—as one who was taken (along with my sisters) to get chicken pox from my cousins in the early ‘50’s , I think it would work-—but not in our present political atmosphere-—


12 posted on 03/26/2020 8:10:29 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the meda or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just a thought from someone who is not a doctor.

As soon as you become infected you start to develop antibodies, right? I guess the question is how much faster does the disease progress compared to antibody progression.

There’s two ways a flu (and presumably the virus) can start: in the nose/throat by contact (usually with your unwashed hands) or directly in the lungs by breathing in aerosolized particles.

The disease is mild-ish in the upper respiratory tract but becomes much more dnagerous when/if it progresses to the lungs.

A thought: if you’re going to get it anyway (as the health officials keep saying) would it be better to get it into your nose, and let the disease progress hopefully slowly and hope you have antibodies built up by the time it gets to the lungs.

vs. taking the chance (again, high likelihood) that you get it later, but maybe you breath it in directly to your lungs and it progresses too fast?

Any doctors have an insight here?


13 posted on 03/26/2020 8:13:04 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

This would probably work but it’s too out of the box so it would never happen.


14 posted on 03/26/2020 8:13:57 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This approach assumes two facts not in evidence: That immunity comes as a result of contact (whether or not you become ill) and that “People who are immune cannot pass on the disease to others”.

I have yet to see data supporting either of these two contentions.


15 posted on 03/26/2020 8:14:03 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This isn’t chicken pox.

Physician from Portland, Oregon? Must be out of his mind to suggest this.


16 posted on 03/26/2020 8:15:35 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRadtke

RE: I did not realize that they did this with chickenpox as well.

My mother did it to me and my brother when we were 6 and 7 respectively.

My brother got the chicken pox. Strangely, I did not, but got it later in my twenties.


17 posted on 03/26/2020 8:15:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JD_UTDallas

By definition, a FluBro is someone who says “It’s just the flu bro!” Now, your stupid suggestion that ANYONE here would want to deliberately contract ANY flu virus proves the insanity of the CovidClowns. It’s always the extreme opposite with you guys just because we don’t drink the Covid Koolaid.


18 posted on 03/26/2020 8:18:08 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why not? What could give wrong?


19 posted on 03/26/2020 8:19:45 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

GO wrong.


20 posted on 03/26/2020 8:20:19 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson