A Weekly Dose of President Trump- Trump Family Train 1/20/2020

Thanks for sharing these moments. God bless your sister. She's thankfully in God's loving hands now.

4,941 posted on 01/30/2020 2:47:53 PM PST by STARLIT (I can't change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination.)

No, I hadn’t heard about the organized massacre. I don’t know if it’s true, but Brennan is an evil man and I wouldn’t put anything past him.

4,942 posted on 01/30/2020 2:48:35 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)

To: Lakeside Granny

According to Schiff, no one knows who the whistleblower is, but he has nevertheless received death threats. 🤔

4,943 posted on 01/30/2020 2:50:42 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)

Thank You for the Ping!
Yay Trump Rally Day!
I’ll be here! WOOHOO!

4,944 posted on 01/30/2020 2:51:54 PM PST by djstex (President Trump 2020! KEEP AMERICA GREAT!)

That thread needs a thread-reader app unroll!!

Good info.

I can’t believe the questions that are being (allowed to be) asked, by Roberts.

It’s like teed up softballs for Schitthead.

What a joke this is.

4,945 posted on 01/30/2020 2:53:27 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)

Mark Meadows

@RepMarkMeadows

· 12m

Adam Schiff didn't answer the question from Senator Graham and others just now.

Here's the answer:

There is FAR more evidence for opening a case against the Bidens involvement in Ukrainian corruption than there EVER was for investigating the Trump campaign in 2016

4,946 posted on 01/30/2020 2:53:45 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are unfit to govern--they hate America, the Constitution and those they don't agree with.)

To: Rusty0604; Lakeside Granny

According to Schiff, no one knows who the whistleblower is, but he has nevertheless received death threats. 🤔

^^ THAT ^^

4,947 posted on 01/30/2020 2:54:21 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)

NIKK, thanks for the explanations on today’s Q drops.

4,948 posted on 01/30/2020 2:55:20 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are unfit to govern--they hate America, the Constitution and those they don't agree with.)

What right did CJ Roberts have to refuse to read a question submitted by a Senator. Where did he get that authority?

4,949 posted on 01/30/2020 2:57:44 PM PST by Freee-dame

Schitt is trying to have it both ways.....

Says he nor his staff had contact with the WB and then a little while latter he praised the WB for being so brave to contact his staff.

Liars have such a hard time keeping their stories straight.

4,950 posted on 01/30/2020 2:58:47 PM PST by Lakeside Granny ( Vote RED~R.emove E.very D.emocrat~D&S)

Thanks!
I just got home and watching now!

4,951 posted on 01/30/2020 2:59:45 PM PST by djstex (President Trump 2020! KEEP AMERICA GREAT!)

To: Lakeside Granny

That’s great, thanks for posting.

4,952 posted on 01/30/2020 3:07:03 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)

Jill Biden’s Doctoral degree is in Education Leadership. She is not a psychologist. She has been an English teacher for many years.

4,953 posted on 01/30/2020 3:07:09 PM PST by Freee-dame

Shem Horne

@Shem_Infinite

Woah Elizabeth Warrens question says Americans have lost faith in our government and asks if the Chief Justice presiding over this trial that may not allow witnesses will cause them to lose faith in the Chief Justice and the Supreme court. Big mistake. Huge.

5:43 PM · Jan 30, 2020·Twitter for Android

Shem Horne

@Shem_Infinite

· 19m

Replying to @Shem_Infinite

Schiff knows how big of a blunder it was for Warren to call into question the Chief Justices character by forcing him to read that insulting question so he immediately says "No, I wouldn't say that." and starts filibustering about Yermak.

Shem Horne

@Shem_Infinite

· 18m

When you are begging the Chief Justice to intervene on witnesses, insulting and threatening him is a terrible idea. Elizabeth Warren is a disgrace and a moron. Yet another unforced error by the Democrats.

4,954 posted on 01/30/2020 3:07:47 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are unfit to govern--they hate America, the Constitution and those they don't agree with.)

https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/01/the-role-of-the-chief-justice-in-an-impeachment-trial/

It is crucial to note why the chief justice appears only in presidential impeachment proceedings. The simple answer has to do with the often-forgotten constitutional power of the vice president to serve as president – meaning presiding officer — of the Senate. In any impeachment case other than that of the president, the vice president can preside, as Thomas Jefferson did in the very first impeachment, that of Senator William Blount in 1799, and as Aaron Burr later did in the 1805 trial of Justice Samuel Chase. However, the Framers recognized that it would be unseemly at best for the person who would assume the presidency in the event of conviction by the Senate to preside over the president’s trial. To prevent that obvious conflict of interest, they specified the chief justice as a stand-in presiding officer in presidential impeachment trials.

A good many discussions of the upcoming Senate proceeding have understandably, but incorrectly, inferred two things from the presence of a judge in the presiding officer’s seat: first, that having a judge preside implies that the process will be akin to a conventional judicial trial, and second, that the chief justice’s role will be akin to that of a judge in such a trial. Neither inference is supported by the constitutional text.

**********************
Despite the formal powerlessness of the role, one could imagine a chief justice thrust into the presiding officer seat who wanted to make a principled statement about the constitutional merits of the case against the president, even if that statement flew in the face of the preferences of a senatorial majority. Such a chief justice might take every available opportunity to rule in favor of, for example, the issuance of subpoenas or the production of witnesses and documents by the president. It seems improbable that Roberts would take this course. Whatever his personal views about Trump, his most likely priority will be to avoid any appearance of partiality, which might imperil his own posture of judicial neutrality and with it the Supreme Court’s institutional legitimacy.
********************************************
Happily for the chief justice, the Senate rules give him an easy way of avoiding any expression of view on any difficult issue. Whenever presented with a question on the admissibility of evidence, the presiding officer need not even make a provisional ruling but instead can immediately “submit any such question to a vote of the Members of the Senate” (Rule VII).
**********************************
Part of the article.

4,955 posted on 01/30/2020 3:09:09 PM PST by STARLIT (I can't change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination.)

It should have one at any time. It was requested.

4,956 posted on 01/30/2020 3:10:38 PM PST by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)

4,957 posted on 01/30/2020 3:12:15 PM PST by miserare ( Trump, forever and ever. Amen.)

Wow!
She’s such an idiot!
Jay Seklow taking them to task again.

4,958 posted on 01/30/2020 3:12:18 PM PST by djstex (President Trump 2020! KEEP AMERICA GREAT!)

4,959 posted on 01/30/2020 3:13:08 PM PST by miserare ( Trump, forever and ever. Amen.)

Now a house rat says that using a foreign spy to write a dossier on a political opponent is a conspiracy and is not an impeachable offense because the dossier was purchased. WTF?
Jay is answering now. Saying non of it was NOT a conspiracy.

4,960 posted on 01/30/2020 3:13:13 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794