What a dork.
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 01/17/2020 4:41:16 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Counterproductive - as usual. |
Posted on 01/14/2020 4:07:51 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Who is Q? What is Q? And, perhaps most importantly, why is Q? Q and the ever-growing worldwide movement it’s inspired have been the objects of fascination, mockery and hatred, but of surprisingly little serious analysis.
*snip*
If you’re unfamiliar with Q or only know it through the media’s attacks, I’d like to provide a brief introduction to this extraordinary phenomenon. I’ve followed Q since the first drop, and I’ve grown increasingly impressed by the accuracy, breadth and depth of Q’s messages. Q followers were prepared long in advance for the easing of hostilities with North Korea, the deflation of the mullahs of Iran, and the discovery of Ukraine as a hotbed of corruption for American politicians. They knew a great deal about Jeffrey Epstein’s activities before the public did and anticipate even more shocking revelations to come. As Q likes to say, “Future proves past.” As Q’s predictions come true, they lend retroactive credibility to the entire enterprise.
Q’s followers believe that Q is a military intelligence operation, the first of its kind, whose goal is to provide the public with secret information. Many Q followers think the Q team was founded by Admiral Michael Rogers, the former Director of the National Security Agency and former Commander of US Cyber Command. Some suspect that Dan Scavino, White House Director of Social Media, is part of the team, because the high quality of Q’s writing has the luster of a communications expert.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Kentucky judge says candidate may not use nickname ‘Trump’ on ballot
Judge Thomas Wingate of the Franklin Circuit Court in Kentucky on Monday denied secretary of state candidate Carl Neff’s request to appear on the 2019 Primary Election ballot under the nickname “Trump,” saying it would give an unfair advantage.
The decision upholds Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes’ position that Neff offered the nickname “in an improper attempt to gain an advantage on the ballot.” Neff argued that not allowing him to appear as “Carl ‘Trump!’ Neff” on the ballot denies him “freedom from absolute and arbitrary power over an individual.”
Neff apparently got the nickname in 2015, “after members of the Jefferson County Republican Party began calling him ‘Trump’ for his insistence that materials for then-candidate Donald Trump be displayed at its booth at the Kentucky State Fair.”
Under Kentucky law, a candidate’s nickname may appear on the ballot, so long as certain criterion set forth by the Secretary of State is met:
[A nickname] shall be placed on the ballot only if it is the candidate’s bona fide nickname, generally used by acquaintances of the candidate in the county of residence to refer to the candidate, and if the nickname is acknowledged, by affidavit, under oath, by five (5) residents of the county in which the candidate resides, to be a bona fide nickname. The candidate shall also acknowledge, by affidavit under oath, that this is his bona fide nickname and is not being used to gain an advantage on the ballot.”
Wingate denied Neff’s request for injunctive relief, saying Grimes did not abuse her power in denying Neff’s nickname request. “A bona fide nickname is one by which members of the community use as an active form of recognition of an individual.” The ruling relies on several pieces of persuasive evidence, such as the fact that the “nickname has not appeared on any branding literature that is available in the public,” and Neff “only used the nickname ‘Trump’ on one of his campaign related materials, a fundraising letter that was mailed to individuals who he addressed as ‘Dear fellow Trump supporter.'”
What a dork.
Trump-Pompeo 2020.
Interesting.
Sorta the anti-MAGA, you ask me.
He He, not sure if we can apply, "this is what panic looks like", maybe not. If you are a real Trump supporter, the voters will know, no need for shenanigans.
CGato
Wait, wait...
Now Pence is a bad guy too?
A regular tunnel-digging devil worshipping adrenochrome banging baby raping pedophile?
Why did Trump select him then?
Bookmarked.
Forced compromise by the Uniparty apparatus.
Trump is doing ... somewhat better than Reagan.
Given the opposition to him from within his own party, much of the sitting judiciary, almost all of the press, most foreign leaders, most of the CIA, JustUs Department (to include the F'ngBunchofIncompetents), former speaker of the House Paul Ryno (who threw the election by not pressing for President Trump's initiatives despite the GOP having both Houses of Congress, then having ~40 GOP members resign and lackidasically funding the conservative replacements), RINO turncoats in the Senate,...
Not to mention Mewler and now Impeachment.
So is it far-fetched to think the party bosses DEMANDED Pence (in return for say, not throwing the GOP National Convention into chaos? remember Cruz stealing the delegates in Colorado?)
You must need more coffee.
Next you're gonna ask me why he selected Reince Priebus as his Chief of Staff.
Come on, bumpkin. Put that big brain to work. This isn't even Q stuff so you're allowed to think about it.
So no ex-CIA can ever run for office?
Interesting. I didn’t find that in the Constitution.
I think it’s kind of clever. Had anyone YOU approve of done this, you’d be shouting kudos.
How about when those same name callers to me admit they were wrong?
Let’s go with this: clear, clean, easily understood predictions of indictments of any of the following:
*Comey
*Clapper
*Brennan
*Peter Strozk
*Lisa Page
*Andrew McCabe
*Bill Priestap
*The Awans
*Loretta Lynch
*Hillary Clinton
There. I gave you eleven so you get an extra waffle room name. Let me have a predicted date, and a public apology when none of these people are indicted.
*Barack Obama
This waffle quote of JFKs is always used, yet YOU know that in fact not only did JFK do NOTHING about the CIA, but he increased massively the # of CIA in Vietnam, going from 500 to 16,000 “Americans” in three years. Many were not military.
You also know that he, through Bobby, authorized and $80k hit by the CIA on Fidel Castro, and that multiple attempted hits were carried out.
You also know that, with JFK’s personal knowledge, they tried using goofball things like exploding or poison cigars.
If was JFK who “wanted to hang his sources on a corrupt organization.”
But, I notice you STILL have yet to produce one single verifiable name, or a single verifiable Q event that isn’t written in gibberish, which could be explained 10 different ways.
So enjoy your Q-tippedness. I won’t respond further to gibberish.
I predict a lot of stuff that is right, far more than Q-tip.
On August 20 on Twit I predicted Trump would win with “between 300 and 320 electoral votes.”
Two weeks before it was announced publicly I said Jon Kyl would replace McTurd.
Before the 2018 election I said we would gain “between 3 and 7 Senate seats net” (final was +3 with McSally losing by less than a half point.
So, Baggie, guess you’ll have to talk with yourself & use your Nostradamus scorecard to decipher Q as I am finished with your non-conversation . . . which tends to resemble Q.
That’s right, sorry, Q-tips, enjoy your masks.
LS,
Thanks for posting the 10 you claim will not be indicted.
I think it’s a reasonable test.
Trump has made it clear this should never happen to a POTUS again, plus I don’t think Trump is the man to let his enemies get away with everything that happened.
“Let me have a predicted date, and a public apology when none of these people are indicted.”
I wouldn’t have any idea at all about a specific date.
In regards to a public apology for you...
I don’t believe I’ve ever called you a name to ridicule your beliefs.
I asked if you would apologize because you have called patriots names and ridiculed their beliefs repeatedly.
I will admit I was wrong. No worries.
But unless your memory is far better than mine, I don’t think I’ve ever wronged you concerning your denial of the legitimacy of Q - never called you a name and only ever asked you for proof when you made categorical statements.
I realize we are ultimately on the same team and pulling for the same things.
I’ll clip this post of yours and save it.
Best.
It would be best if the infiltrated and controlled CIA didn't run for office, yes.
The derps are bad enough controlling our instituitions and politicians through their machinations, why would we want them being the actual politicians?
Duh.
Because he was assassinated by the CIA (derp state). Did you miss that one?
You think in simple terms.
Sure you do. I won a hundred dollars betting on Trump. Tell us about your 2018 House prediction, Nostradamus. Everybody called the Senate.
Thing of it is, LS. You have a bad case of Q envy. He's cutting into your gig and you don't much like it. Without Q around gumming up the works, you'd fancy yourself the great 'predictor' and prognosticator and sell a whole lotta more books. Look how you brag about your predictions that anybody coulda made. You are a paytriot and the CIA's man.
You are part of the problem, goodman.
#WakeUp
I agree we’re on the same team.
To have any prediction subject to test, you have to have names and a reasonable date.
The world will end is not a prediction, or a test. The world will end on March 3 is.
So, if you have any other names you’d like to suggest, fine.
As for apologizing? to whom? Whom have I ridiculed, unless you count the name “Q-tip”? If you have a better term (”Q-sters,” “Q-aholics,” I’m open. Meanwhile, check the names and terms I’m called for asking, just asking on multiple occasions for ONE simple test we can all agree to. “Arrogant,” “paytriot” . . . need I go on?
Unlike anyone in the Q movement, I put very specific predictions-—not just “Trump will win” but “Trump will win with between 300 and 320 electoral votes . . .” And did it a year out. I said the Rs would hold the senate and gain “between 4-7 seats”. I was off by ONE SEAT, by less than a half a percent.
I said two weeks before it happened (cuz I happened to have inside “sources”) that Jon Kyl would be McTurd’s replacement.
These are the kinds of very specific tests I would like to see from any Q supporter. Not nebulous Nostradamus open phrases that can be interpreted any way, but just 2-3 names and dates we can all agree on as a test.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.