Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

Well, well, well, looky what popped up on American Thinker this morning!

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/01/an_introduction_to_q.html

-SB


198 posted on 01/14/2020 3:40:50 AM PST by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Snowybear

Notice the need for a pen name because the author fears professional retribution.


199 posted on 01/14/2020 4:04:43 AM PST by DainBramage (Barrett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Snowybear

Q at American Thinker.

wow.


201 posted on 01/14/2020 4:17:33 AM PST by smileyface (I LOVE POTUS DONALD J. TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Snowybear

Sharing that link! Needs more Q responses in comments.


208 posted on 01/14/2020 4:48:11 AM PST by TXBubba (Democrats: If they don't abort you they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Snowybear

Re American Thinker article on Q:

That’s a pretty big deal!


216 posted on 01/14/2020 5:12:03 AM PST by Melian ( Check yourself before you KeK yourself. ~ Melian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Snowybear

Bump to share with my husband, who keeps asking “What is a Q?”


228 posted on 01/14/2020 6:40:28 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (I trust President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Snowybear; USMC79to83; ransomnote; mairdie; All

Snowy, that’s a really good article “Introduction to Q”!

I’m recommending we link that at the top of our Q threads in Ransomnote’s collection of Q resources.

Also, someone might want to download that article and put it on their FR homepage.


302 posted on 01/14/2020 11:59:53 AM PST by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Snowybear

Well, well, well, looky what popped up on American Thinker this morning!

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/01/an_introduction_to_q.html


I haven’t really seen anyone on this thread ask “Why Now?” regarding the AT piece on Q. I have seen the editor, Thomas Lifson, interviewed and he does not strike me as someone who would be easy to convince that Q is real and worthy of an article, especially such a long article by AT standards.

The article is very well written and has a lot of resources. In my opinion, more than one person contributed to it.

So why was it published now? I have to believe that over the last year and half others have submitted pro Q pieces to AT, and some of these pieces had to be fairly good. But they weren’t published.

I have a few theories for consideration:

1) Lifson has been contacted by someone on the Q team and asked to publish the article, which may have been written by the team.

2) The article was submitted to Lifson by someone he knows and respects. The person’s real name is known to him and he was totally gobsmacked that this person believes in Q.
If so, this person could very well be a name we would recognize.

If #1, Q wants more conservatives exposed to him because: a) he wants more, fresher researchers on the case because the current crop is getting stale; b) he is getting ready to drop some really big crumbs about really big events that are definitely going to come true soon and wants more people “predicting” them so their friends ask, “How did you know that was going to happen?” ; c) — I haven’t come up with a C yet.


784 posted on 01/15/2020 4:43:28 PM PST by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson