Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Snowybear

Well, well, well, looky what popped up on American Thinker this morning!

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/01/an_introduction_to_q.html


I haven’t really seen anyone on this thread ask “Why Now?” regarding the AT piece on Q. I have seen the editor, Thomas Lifson, interviewed and he does not strike me as someone who would be easy to convince that Q is real and worthy of an article, especially such a long article by AT standards.

The article is very well written and has a lot of resources. In my opinion, more than one person contributed to it.

So why was it published now? I have to believe that over the last year and half others have submitted pro Q pieces to AT, and some of these pieces had to be fairly good. But they weren’t published.

I have a few theories for consideration:

1) Lifson has been contacted by someone on the Q team and asked to publish the article, which may have been written by the team.

2) The article was submitted to Lifson by someone he knows and respects. The person’s real name is known to him and he was totally gobsmacked that this person believes in Q.
If so, this person could very well be a name we would recognize.

If #1, Q wants more conservatives exposed to him because: a) he wants more, fresher researchers on the case because the current crop is getting stale; b) he is getting ready to drop some really big crumbs about really big events that are definitely going to come true soon and wants more people “predicting” them so their friends ask, “How did you know that was going to happen?” ; c) — I haven’t come up with a C yet.


784 posted on 01/15/2020 4:43:28 PM PST by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: CheshireTheCat

Thomas Lifson is a great writer. I don’t follow but always stop and share when I see his name. Been around for awhile.


798 posted on 01/15/2020 4:56:14 PM PST by DrDude (A day Late and a Dollar short!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat
Thanks for the link. Good article.

You wrote:
[possibility] 1) Lifson has been contacted by someone on the Q team and asked to publish the article, which may have been written by the team ... Q wants more conservatives exposed to him because: ... b) he is getting ready to drop some really big crumbs about really big events that are definitely going to come true soon and wants more people “predicting” them so their friends ask, “How did you know that was going to happen?”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is an interesting speculation. I will mention that, for the first time, in his KAG rally in Milwaukee 1/14/2020, POTUS suggested that Clinton discussed SCOTUS appointment with Lynch on the tarmac.

812 posted on 01/15/2020 5:09:39 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

++++!


841 posted on 01/15/2020 5:56:54 PM PST by bitt (A FRIVOLOUS impeachment vote is a SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson