Posted on 01/09/2020 12:05:31 PM PST by ransomnote
I like those theories, Makes sense to me.
defconw wrote:
“
https://twitter.com/texan_maga/status/1216521369879490560
New campaign ad. Love it!”
ThankQ, defconw for finding this!
Awesome vid !!!
Ping!!!
The WaPo story was posted on this thread and taken apart by a few people including ahem me; the sources (choke/gag) were unnamed “current and former officials”.
” the mods may remove a comment if the author of the comment requests it”
Yah, if the poster requests it they do it. Good if you find out after the fact that you posted something that was rubbish and you can get it removed. In this case I posted, meant to send a P.M.
Thanks for posting all these, I clicked and read. Gen. Valleley is the only person I’ve read using the term the Army of Northern Virginia and it doesn’t appear anywhere else. Have you seen any insignia or official type designation for it?
The Demsheviks are fully revealing themselves as the party of Mordor.
The only Black, Native American, Asian, Latino running!
Check the link I provided.
Interesting since conviction by senate requires 2/3 of those senators PRESENT for the vote
+17 and 188% boost.
No. The House fills the role of prosecutor by appointing 'managers', usually someone intimately involved in compiling 'evidence' against the president. The White House can pick its defense 'attorneys', possibly from the House or from wherever they choose. The Senate votes on the rules for the trial, generally under the rules for most juries and most trials.
If Mitch McConnell should decide to call additional witnesses, especially witnesses the Dems want, then the role of a jury becomes perverted (juries do not call witnesses) and opens the door for another Kavanaugh circus.
The WH can request witnesses and the Senate can vote on each one (providing the voted-on rules allow it.) If the Senate holds a true trial one would expect the WH to request witnesses, since they were not allowed such representation in the House.
Today I wrote the Trump Campaign and urged them to press POTUS to bypass the Senate and appeal directly to SCOTUS, to ask that the Articles of Impeachment be declared unconstitutional on the grounds of gross violations of human rights and everything this country has stood for. The WH has nothing to lose. If successful, Prez Trump is NOT impeached, which is not the case if the charges are rejected in the Senate. ALSO, it serves to discourage the Dems from further excursions into impeachment. You may remember my pointing out a few weeks ago that weaponizing the impeachment process could serve to turn us into a parliamentary system, where the executive is always answerable to the majority in the House.
Like the kid who cried Wolf!, impeachment would lose all its constitutional power.
I also wrote that Prez Trump should confiscate the passport of John Kerry and put an end to his treason; forget hollering about violation of the Logan Act and doing nothing.
Up the Revolution - MAGA, KAGA!
Q Anon: 01/09/20 Trust Trumps Plan ~ Vol.206, Q Day 804
1/11/2020, 3:38:39 PM · 781 of 1,309
HoneysuckleTN to TEXOKIE
Jane Badler was Diana on the original “V” series.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Australian Actor, Musician and Model Harry Hains, Son of Actress Jane Badler, Dead at 27 https://t.co/DEPKetBTdD; People (@people) January 9, 2020
More: people.com
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thanks for the info, HoneysuckleTN!
Wow! Venison and Cars! An expensive way to play pong!
Interesting since conviction by senate requires 2/3 of those senators PRESENT for the vote
*******************
And if all the Never Trump Rinos don’t show up for the vote, it will take fewer Dems to get to 2/3rds.
Frightening.
PING
Check out link.
Thanks, Wildhighlander.
defconw wrote:
https://twitter.com/texan_maga/status/1216521369879490560
New campaign ad.
ThankQ, defconw for finding this!
Awesome vid !!!
Ping!!!
The chief justice of the United States would be sworn in to preside over the trial and would then swear in the members of the Senate.
****************
When Roberts was appointed to the Supreme Court, he immediately became the Chief Justice.
Who decides which member plays that role?
If the President does so, why can’t Trump change the person playing that role? Why couldn’t Thomas be Chief Justice?
X22 seems to get it right. He mentions Rex but doesn’t call him out. X22 seems to think that either it was handed off to another prosecutor or it’s over. Or not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yh3ht2GxiLo
Huber stuff starts at 18:10.
-SB
Because the Senate has sole power to determine the process. I stated, The Senate must try the case as a jury because juries do not call witnesses or continue to prosecute the accused. A jury must remain impartial. I assure you the Dems hope to turn impeachment into another Kavanaugh outrage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.