Posted on 01/06/2020 11:48:21 AM PST by ransomnote
On another thread there is a reminder - re Mike Lee & Mittens - that the $$$ sent to Iran was laundered through a small bank in Utah
Libertarianism is worse than that.
It is no holds barred ultra hedonism, total isolationism, complete open borders (”free flow of goods and people”) without any restraint, and supposedly low taxes.
Libertarian platform is all porn anyway, all abortion until due date, all prostituion legalized, ALL drugs legalized, for starters. i haven’t seen their official website lately but I did see that they tried to pretty up their platform so as not to disgust people, but those are their positions.
Still waiting to verify it on Wiki, though.
KEK
Note my reply to greeneyes I just posted.
She was diagnosed at Stage 4 and told she'd probably live 6 months without treatment but maybe 12 months with treatment. I pushed her to take the treatment. In 2014 I was still naive enough to believe that it was possible for some new break through to occur during those extra 6 months. I'd never recommend that anyone follow my advise on cancer treatments.
But who knows...heard this morning that RBG, the frail, 85 year old, three time late stage cancer patient is now miraculously 'cancer free'. What a racket-"cures for me but not for thee".
Thanks Redd, I appreciate that.
Really good analysis, but what else would you expect from Victor Davis Hanson?
Iran’s Options in Showdown with America Are All Bad
Victor Davis Hanson
FTA:
As long as Trump replies with air power disproportionate to any Iranian attacks, he, not Tehran, governs the tempo of the confrontation.
Iran created the current crisis. It has choices, but for now they are all bad.
>>What a racket-”cures for me but not for thee”.
My heart breaks for you, dan. All the sympathy in the world. The sky should shriek with agony when a good person is lost to it.
Please see my post above about Libertarian positions.
Two tiered cancer treatments.
Step 1 in establishing a “socialist order” form of governance:
Plea to the emotional aspect.
Examples
How can you be AGAINST providing welfare to the needy?
We advocate for the FUTURE generations.
If it doesn’t harm anyone, why not legalize it and let us regulate it.
It’s all the same pseudoMarxist playbook, only called different names.
You describe anti-government anarchy.
See my recent post regarding “socialist order”.
I think they'll get rolled up in the Juicy Fruit mess, if we are to believe the drops.
Kate’s birthday is overshadowed by royal crisis as it emerges Prince Harry ‘DEFIED’ Queen’s orders not to announce he and Meghan Markle will quit and left Prince Charles and Prince William ‘incandescent with rage’ by giving them just 10 minutes’ notice
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-7868371/PIERS-MORGAN-Queen-FIRE-Royal-Hustlers.html
Why the Queen must FIRE Their Royal Hustlers: Deluded Meghan and Harry should be stripped of their titles before this pair of grasping, selfish, scheming Kardashian-wannabes bring down the Monarchy, says PIERS MORGAN
FTA:
To summarise, they want to stop being ‘senior royals’ with all the tedious duty that entails.
And instead, they now want to be a ‘progressive’ force within ‘the institution’.
In other words, they want to be super-woke celebrities (with all the outrageous ‘Do as we say not as we do’ hectoring hypocrisy they’ve already brought to that status) who get to keep all the trappings of royal life without any of the hard, boring bits and the right to cash in on their status however they choose.
So, they want the glitz, the glamour, the splendour and the stupendous wealth….they just don’t want to have to actually earn it.
What a pathetic joke.
“You can’t tell the players without a program!”
(h/t - ballpark vendors)
Examples
How can you be AGAINST providing welfare to the needy?[Democrat Socialists]
We advocate for the FUTURE generations. [Progressive Socialists]
If it doesn’t harm anyone, why not legalize it and let us regulate it. {Libertarian Socialists]
Pardon my ignorance, but how\when did the Turtle get the nickname Cocaine Mitch?
>>Pardon my ignorance, but how\when did the Turtle get the nickname Cocaine Mitch?
You and me both! Haven’t the faintest idea why it attaches and what it’s meant to imply. Would love it if someone knew and could tell us.
And drugs. The duchess is a party girl and likes drugs. Allegedly.
Isn't that low that she decided to make her announcement to disrupt Kate's birthday? What an obnoxious thing to do. No doubt it was on purpose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.