Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CJ Wolf; ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; ptsal; ...

https://twitter.com/6B1222T/status/1204141718125199360

So (digital forensics person here) Comey 159 times ans Corney 153 times. I checked the binary/hex level to see if it was an OCR error in the software >>> it was NOT. At the binary it IS different. Crazy!!!!!!


I have not verified this, but I have believed from the start that the Comey/Corney “mistake” was on purpose and NOT the result of an OCR error.

My reasoning: If this were an OCR error, it would happen with other words containing “m”. Furthermore, it is far more likely for an OCR error to change “rn” to “m” than the other way around. Lastly, an OCR error of this type would most likely be intermittent. It would happen when the pixels lined up in a particular way, but not when they happened to land slightly differently.

An OCR error that was so consistent seems highly unlikely to me. With today’s tech, I would find it highly dubious that the government would use a lame OCR scanner for such an important document.


204 posted on 12/09/2019 2:47:41 PM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: generally

I despise these democrats.

They continually assert that “the facts are not disputed” and “no one denies that the Russians hacked our election”.


206 posted on 12/09/2019 2:50:41 PM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: generally

I have not verified this, but I have believed from the start that the Comey/Corney “mistake” was on purpose and NOT the result of an OCR error.

*****************************************************

If it was not a mistake and done on purpose, would that mean they put out the exact report they wanted us to see? Horowitz wouldn’t have done that on his own, correct?


212 posted on 12/09/2019 3:06:26 PM PST by overkill_007_2000 (If i'm staring at the ceiling I must be laying on the floor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: generally; Liz; bitt

Liz- please bump this to the top.

The research is partially crippled by the intentional screwing or scrabbling of the OCR results.

Horowitz is probably a willing part of the coup. Fire his butt.


213 posted on 12/09/2019 3:09:05 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Interesting...the report I downloaded, during an Adobe search and an advanced search, show 148 Corney and no Comey each.

A Browser search of each show 149 Corney and no Comey.


215 posted on 12/09/2019 3:11:09 PM PST by stylin19a ((2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Generally, dont think it is an OCR error. I think OCR captured it correctly. I thin it was an auto correct error that was human approve. E = rn m.

Then they said yes to auto replace throughout the doc.


297 posted on 12/09/2019 6:40:45 PM PST by CJ Wolf (-Please forgive my misspellings, as I forgive those that misspell around me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson