Having given a quick read to this article, I has too many disagreements with which to start on, and yet address what I feel the core of this article tries to convince. First off I am going to stick to the policy’s aspect.
The US and Russia are set to divide up areas of influence and at the same time find cooperation without the threat of constant Mutual Destruction. China may too be accommodated within her own boundaries a peaceful space as long as they do not encroach while keeping open sea lanes.
The banks are always going to “own” without “owning” being mostly a leveraged economic-political-military(Intelligence) regime. Nothing enlightening here.
Speculation about motives, assassinations, among the misunderstanding of basic 19th and 20th Century Europe and Russia mingled with hot buttons are fodder for conspiracy theorists.
This is a well written assignment, or puff piece published for policy makers who have little time nor expertise in their areas of influence, but lacking in one regard, that the author is suspect to represent an anti-American, anti-Russia (but written in a pro Russian Pen), and almost totally neglects the main Oriental benefactor, China.
what do you think of that weasel Vindman?
TXnMA
P.S. Thank you for your service!
(FWIW,"#2 Son" is retiring as CSM in the 82nd ABN...)
Q Anon: 11/16/19 Trust Trumps Plan ~ Vol.191, Q Day 750
11/19/2019, 8:53:31 AM · 983 of 1,204
Jumper to TEXOKIE
Having given a quick read to this article, I has too many disagreements with which to start on, and yet address what I feel the core of this article tries to convince. First off I am going to stick to the policys aspect.
The US and Russia are set to divide up areas of influence and at the same time find cooperation without the threat of constant Mutual Destruction. China may too be accommodated within her own boundaries a peaceful space as long as they do not encroach while keeping open sea lanes.
The banks are always going to own without owning being mostly a leveraged economic-political-military(Intelligence) regime. Nothing enlightening here.
Speculation about motives, assassinations, among the misunderstanding of basic 19th and 20th Century Europe and Russia mingled with hot buttons are fodder for conspiracy theorists.
This is a well written assignment, or puff piece published for policy makers who have little time nor expertise in their areas of influence, but lacking in one regard, that the author is suspect to represent an anti-American, anti-Russia (but written in a pro Russian Pen), and almost totally neglects the main Oriental benefactor, China.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thank you so much for your considered and well stated review of the article with the link posted by generally from a transom anon in post 924.
Link to the article in question:
https://orientalreview.org/2019/11/15/about-trump/