Posted on 08/07/2019 5:06:27 PM PDT by ransomnote
Disinformation?
standing down protection for a man in prison seems to me negligent homicide at a minimum, and if i were the judge, murder. it is like kicking a person when the person is down, only with intentionally fatal results. any way you slice it, it is immoral. if this were planned from the white hats, several individuals in the chain of command at the prison would need to be convinced enough to buy into the view that the ends (epstein’s death) somehow justifies the means (negligent homicide, conspiracy, denial of due process). most of these individuals would have a legal or criminology background. they would knowingly be putting themselves at great risk by joining in a conspiracy, even in a passive role. i for one am just not seeing any daylight in your scenario.
Media now saying “apparent suicide”.
See link to story in txhurl post:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3770868/posts?page=1#1
Interesting Twitter thread
1. ) I THINK I JUST MADE A HUGE DISCOVERY.
What if a document exists that helps guide Anons through Q’s drops
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1160500968250679302.html
+1
And if they have it all, then Epstein death doesn’t matter.
They can still go after Epstein’s co- conspirators.
(sorry, flying blind for the moment due to time constraints)
continuing for a moment along the lines of “follow the money,” has anyone considered yet the coincidence that les wexner claimed he was financially bilked by epstein only about 24 hours prior to epstein’s “suicide”? criminal proceedings against epstein will cease, but civil proceedings against epstein’s estate will begin or continue. with his fortune at beck and call to mount a legal challenge in civil courts, wexner would be a big fish swimming with many little fish in this litigation tsunami. another thought: wexner may have gained more in publicity points than he would stand to gain in added wealth if he were to prevail in civil court against epstein’s estate, but his ballet-like timing still seems very suspicious to me.
Or got jumped by inmates at least once (that we know of).
from another thread:
“Unless I’m missing something, Epstein was being held in the Manhatten City Jail. That isn’t under the custody and control of the Feds at all. It’s the City of New York and de Blasio that run that jail.”
~~~~~
so how is this DJT’s fault???
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oOAkU_4iPYA
This is the threeish minute where LG has Kegger define the other body of law that handles traitors who go overseas and commit treason and sedition against the US govt, Afghanistan was the example used, with LG reminding audience that traitors were, and still can be, EXECUTED.
“Standing down to allow a murder would be criminal. I would even question the morality of allowing a suicide. It leaves to many people vulnerable to litigation.”
Is it possible Epstein had already be through a military tribunal, found guilty and this was his execution, in a manner that would move the investigation and/or litigation forward?
If not, maybe I’ll use it as part of a plot in a future novel.
It would not fit that description. Standing down in the face of a known plan and purposely allowing a known plan would be one thing.
I don’t take mongrel’s theory as that. Just “not taking extra measures”, and the measures supposed to be in place at the prison should have been sufficient.
Is this real ?
~~~~~~~~~
No but it’s so close to real that it’s fooled several already!
https://i.postimg.cc/RCbxjHQp/Hillary-Eulogy-Epstein.jpg
More b.s.
So you’re saying the entire fed LE agencies are still rotten to the core.
As usual B.A. is sowing defeatism and contention.
Wonder what CINC’s planning to do about this...
***************************************************
I wish I knew.
Epstein was being held in the Manhattan City Jail. That isn’t under the custody and control of the Feds at all, it’s the City of New York and de Blasio that run that jail.
~~~
1. If they decide the larger goals were still served (perhaps better) if he died,
2. If preventing his death could not easily be done,
3. If allowing his death created more evidence trails to the guilty,
4. If allowing his death expedited legal challenges,
5. If there was evidence the Epstein wanted to die,
6. If Epstein is not the key player that needed to be brought to justice for victims to have their day in court,
Yes we’ve known ROLCON all along
We just always called it CONcern tROLl
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
