Saw the movie and it was an entertaining fantasy:-)
One of his best.
Tarantino is deeeeep Hollywood:
Why did he so suddenly take on such a clear hostility to HIPPEES..?
I don’t get it.
It’s unmistakable; at at least 4 different times in the film he has people dumping on hippees, lighting them on fire, etc.
Don’t get me wrong, I love it.
But I don’t understand WHY he did this.
Transgressive [snort!]
History of art:
“I have created a work of art — and it is beautiful!”
“I have created a work of art — it’s not pretty, but it will make you think!”
“I have created a work of art — it’s not pretty, there is little thought behind it, but it will really piss you off!”
That last category of art is something a 4-year-old can do easily.
To me Tarantino is the film version of Steven King’s novels. Sick. The only good one that SK did was Christine and it was noway like the book; infinitely better.
From the article:
“Why are Robbie’s feet, slipped out of immaculate white gogo boots and slung over a movie seat in front of her, so filthy? That is between Quentin Tarantino and his god. “
Tarantino’s foot fetish and his fetish for strangling women, are already very disturbing. Sounds like he’s developed a scatological fetish as well.
He’s a talented but troubled individual, as well as a cop hating leftist.
The difference between Charles Manson and Tarantino?
One is a film maker who love gore.
>>Say what you will about Charles Manson, he really empowered women to pursue excellence in traditionally male-dominated fields. From armed robbery to sadistic murder at knifepoint, he put women in positions from which they had been traditionally excluded
Uh, no.
Angela Davis was a straw purchaser for the murderous crimes of the Black Panthers Maoist black nationalist hate group.
Bernardine Dohrn celebrated the Manson killings taking it to the capitalist pigs and even feasting on their foods.
Manson trafficked in women, used them to get want he wanted (access, lodging, money, etc.).
his next film might be Star Trek.