Not-So-Deep Fakes: New AI-Powered App Creates Realistic Nude Photos of Women for $50

sputniknews.com ^ | 15:50 27.06.2019 | staff

[PapaBear3625]

Even if you pay the $50 fee, the software imprints the word ‘fake’ in the photo like a watermark.......

And somebody will create an app to eliminate the "fake" watermark from the output image.

[BenLurkin]

[PapaBear3625]

DeepNude appears to work only with high-resolution photos of women facing the camera directly,

But will it be able to tell if it's processing an image of a 13 year old girl? I can see various law enforcement people demanding a feed of what it does.

Next stage would be to be able to download the app, to process images directly on your PC, so that nothing transits the Cloud.

[Lazamataz]

I’d hit it.

[Buckeye McFrog]

[Bulwyf]

You make some real valid points heh.

[Bulwyf]

I laughed harder than I should of lol.

[real saxophonist]

HILLArious!

[Red Badger]

I always wanted me a pair of those.................still do!.............

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

You must be comfortable indeed in your own skin. I went to a Rush TV filming once, and the camera panned the audience at the start, and zoomed in on one person - me!

I saw that happen, and positively knew that I was fully shown in the opening before the start of the show. And when I got home, my wife told me she had taped it, and that I was right there in the opening scene of the audience. Which, I repeat, I positively knew was happening at the time.

So I watched the tape - and I wasn’t in it at all! I rewound it again and again, and I couldn’t see myself. I think my wife had to point my own image out to me! And there it was, “big as life” (we didn’t have a big flat-screen TV back then, of course - or that literally would have been true).

We look in mirrors, but we don’t really see ourselves. My wife recently had a reason to take a selfie - and recoiled from it in horror. Because - as I understand from my much earlier (and younger) experience - we just don’t see ourselves as others see us. Mirror, schmirror - we just don’t.

So I venture the guess that your husband would like a poster like that much more than you would (and I sure pity the poor schlub if he didn’t, and actually admitted it!). If I had such of my wife, I would simply complain that it doesn’t do her justice - entirely too flat, and not nearly as soft as the real thing!

[colorado tanker]

[Red Badger]

I was 4 years old...................

[BuffaloJack]

That’s almost like the time TV Guide took a photo of Ann Margret and put Oprah’s head on it. Sacrilege-Sacrilege.

[Red Badger]

[Chickensoup]

did somone copy one of the pictures for the other?

[Red Badger]

Yes, they used an old photo of Ann Margaret and put Oprah’s head on it...............

[Covenantor]

Yes, they used an old photo of Ann Margaret and put Oprah’s head on it.............

WTH? That's a crime against humanity!

[Political Junkie Too]

it couldn’t calculate a solution for a full frontal of Hillary.

-PJ

[Sawdring]

How many mega pixels can it imagine?

[Red Badger]

The article said HD, so whatever that is...........