Not if you maintain your distance.
It's a pretty high ice wall! 
You will definitely pick that up on radar and if you run into that you shouldn't be captaining a ship.
Posted on 06/19/2019 11:08:33 AM PDT by Gamecock
Call ghostbusters!
“it just those wacky Christians who believe this? “
That’s the idea of this hoax. Smear conservatives as lunatics. Equate not buying global warming or other leftist proposed Eco disasters with flat earth.
I read further and see you are quite insane or else one of the hoaxers.
All you have to do is record the orders to the helm.
Keep the land to port and if you always steer to starboard you're going in a circle.
If you keep the land to port and you always steer to port you get a different circle.
Yes, but the latter circle keeps running aground.
Not if you maintain your distance.
It's a pretty high ice wall!
You will definitely pick that up on radar and if you run into that you shouldn't be captaining a ship.
What? Brought back into view with a camera? How exactly does a camera do that?
Of course NASA can’t reveal this stuff otherwise the real secret about the moon could get out. Flat earthers know the truth about the moon. We didn’t land on it because the moon is made of cheese. The moon was once a giant cheeseball sitting in the middle of the flat earth.
Hey, it makes just as much sense as Flat Earth.
“No they haven’t...”
Yes, they have. There are countless videos on youtube devoted to addressing every point they bring up, both by scientists and laymen.
“Show me any place in the universe that an object produces a shadow smaller than itself”
Sure. Go measure the length of your shadow ten minutes before or after noon, then compare it to your height. It will be smaller.
Here's a nice photo of the clearly spherical Earth taken during Apollo 8:
Really, to prove their Flat Earth hypothesis, all they need to do is start sailing east or west along the Equator without turning. If they eventually hit the artic or antartic, then their hypothesis is proved. If they stay on the equator and never reach the arctic, then their hypothesis is disproven.
Not sure about the edge of the universe, but I hear there is a very nice restaurant at the end of the universe.
Shorter not smaller. Try that with a ball and a single light source.
Go look at them and see for yourself, then you will know. Of course it may be that the light bends over the horizon by gravity and all you need is cool telescope to see forever.
Ever look down a railroad track? We are limited on what we see by many factors but perspective is a big one.
“Shorter not smaller”
Shorter IS smaller, just smaller in only one dimension. Unless your shadow is getting wider at the same time it is getting shorter, then shorter=smaller.
“Try that with a ball and a single light source.”
Why? I’ve already given you the example that you asked for. You just want to move the goalposts now.
The signs leading up to it say ...
Next stop is the last stop;
Moebius this ain’t.
Shop around then take back home
the shaving soap of saints.
Burma Shave
Because the moon is ball.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.