generally to TEXOKIE
T posted:
Hannity:
Will there be indictments?
Victoria says:
“No….” References the Lisa Page text where POTUS wants to keep informed. …talking points for James Comey to brief Obama
[texokie note: I found it hard to follow her reasoning, other than prior actions wherein the double standards prevailed. She seemed quite cynical and frustrated.]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
G:
IMO that’s disinformation. Just a teeny weeny toothpick for the DS to hang onto in order to convince themselves that they have a chance of staying afloat.
T:
[I agree, and actually wondered that myself as a possibility. I think the DeGenova/Toensing team have been engaging in a lot of disinformation. I like your grasping at “toothpicks” analogy!]
G:
Also IMO, *IF* she’s right, it will be because of clever wording. Maybe there “won’t be” because there “already have been”. Maybe there will be some no name type endings. Maybe there will be some red scarves in some people’s futures. I’m not sure how this will all play out, but confident that the Q team will play it all within the law.
T:
[I often forget the parsing exercise which often takes place in the minds of lawyers. Good point. I agree about the up and upedness of the Q Team.]
G:
If they (Q team) weren’t going to do everything by the book, they would have come out with guns blazing from the git-go. The Q team intends for this to absolutely ironclad, irrefutable, done cleanly. The evidence will be impossible to ignore or deny. The methods will be sound with no legal loopholes to challenge them. The swamp will be drained down to the last drop. And above all, they will act with moral authority, not just legal.
Again, JMO.
T:
Great comments, Gen! Thanks!
Thanks for the upvote, TEXOKIE!
One more possibility that I thought of is that certain players like Toensig know some of the plan but not all of the plan. She might genuinely be concerned about a lack of indictments. Much like the FReepers beyond the trees.
We’ll see.
One more thing. “Will there be indictments?” Was it ever clear who this was referring to? H didn’t ask point blank whether HRC or 0vomit would be indicted or about any other specific person.
Before Q, most of us already realized that there were multiple tiers of justice. One for the average Schmo. One for those who were connected. And an extra-punitive one for those who were enemies of the well-connected. Now that we are in the Trump era, I find it difficult to imagine that there will be NO indictments at all. Even those who think that the big players are going to skate must see that there is a LOT going on and that at least the bit players are going down.
So for someone to honestly say no indictments, they must be thinking of very specific high level individuals. Or else they are blind to everything going on. They must be blind to all of the changes at DOJ. Surely someone like Toensig is well aware of that.