Posted on 05/31/2019 1:01:22 PM PDT by ransomnote
I don’t know about another show, but the link to the full show has been posted so you will get to watch the whole thing.
We know stuff that many teevee watchers don’t know yet. It’s a roll out of info, speeding up.
They wanted the republic to fall.
Q Anon: 05/31/19 Trust Trump’s Plan
6/1/2019, 3:50:28 PM · 353 of 376
little jeremiah to TEXOKIE
Thank you so much for those notes. I hope the entire show becomes available. This was indeed very interesting:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5.And finally, you have all these Congressional oversight hearings that can elicit things we have not seen in a long time.”
[texokie note: “seen in a long time” .... that is interesting. ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Benghazi? Fast and Furious? IRS targeting? The stopping of Operation Cassandra? Arab Spring and $ sent to Egypt to get Morsi/Moslem Bros in charge? And much much more!
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34
Q Q Q Q Q Q
You are welcome, lj!
I think all of those you listed are strong possibles.
U1 is an obvious possible , too.
I have been getting caught up with dvrs from last night. Laura was interviewing Rudy. I just now heard him explain that Mueller’s team had deleted a bunch of Strozk / Page texts..... I wonder if we may have some of those retrieved by the NSA.....At this point, it is a big universe of “long time since we seens.”
BiggBob posted a link to the whole show, which I also reposted.
Hannity, Sara Carter and John Solomon know a lot more than Victoria. I do not believe for a split second that there won’t be indictments. Was she saying that in a general way or very narrowly?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
To my ear, she seemed frustrated. I was not trying to transcribe at that point, and so I was only sketching my impressions at that point.... Probably because I agree with you! I think there will be indictments,.... and it is possible she was in disinformation mode too.
generally to TEXOKIE
T posted:
Hannity:
Will there be indictments?
Victoria says:
“No….” References the Lisa Page text where POTUS wants to keep informed. …talking points for James Comey to brief Obama
[texokie note: I found it hard to follow her reasoning, other than prior actions wherein the double standards prevailed. She seemed quite cynical and frustrated.]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
G:
IMO that’s disinformation. Just a teeny weeny toothpick for the DS to hang onto in order to convince themselves that they have a chance of staying afloat.
T:
[I agree, and actually wondered that myself as a possibility. I think the DeGenova/Toensing team have been engaging in a lot of disinformation. I like your grasping at “toothpicks” analogy!]
G:
Also IMO, *IF* she’s right, it will be because of clever wording. Maybe there “won’t be” because there “already have been”. Maybe there will be some no name type endings. Maybe there will be some red scarves in some people’s futures. I’m not sure how this will all play out, but confident that the Q team will play it all within the law.
T:
[I often forget the parsing exercise which often takes place in the minds of lawyers. Good point. I agree about the up and upedness of the Q Team.]
G:
If they (Q team) weren’t going to do everything by the book, they would have come out with guns blazing from the git-go. The Q team intends for this to absolutely ironclad, irrefutable, done cleanly. The evidence will be impossible to ignore or deny. The methods will be sound with no legal loopholes to challenge them. The swamp will be drained down to the last drop. And above all, they will act with moral authority, not just legal.
Again, JMO.
T:
Great comments, Gen! Thanks!
I think there is a lot of disinfo from the white hats, and of course no doubt plenty of the good guys don’t know everything. There are many evidences of purposeful disinfo, like Trump criticizing Sessions for recusing, etc.
little jeremiah to TEXOKIE
I think there is a lot of disinfo from the white hats, and of course no doubt plenty of the good guys don’t know everything. There are many evidences of purposeful disinfo, like Trump criticizing Sessions for recusing, etc.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Exactly. I agree with you. Good point about the Sessions example.
Undercover Huber
Caption this, thread. LOL
https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1134904407731167242
Yep.
DeepState is gettin desperate...
Yes Francis is against all walls except his own. He needs to mind his own business as regards American business and security.
Yep. Me too.
Yeah, and Keith probably said; "Ewww, no".
Thanks for the upvote, TEXOKIE!
One more possibility that I thought of is that certain players like Toensig know some of the plan but not all of the plan. She might genuinely be concerned about a lack of indictments. Much like the FReepers beyond the trees.
We’ll see.
One more thing. “Will there be indictments?” Was it ever clear who this was referring to? H didn’t ask point blank whether HRC or 0vomit would be indicted or about any other specific person.
Before Q, most of us already realized that there were multiple tiers of justice. One for the average Schmo. One for those who were connected. And an extra-punitive one for those who were enemies of the well-connected. Now that we are in the Trump era, I find it difficult to imagine that there will be NO indictments at all. Even those who think that the big players are going to skate must see that there is a LOT going on and that at least the bit players are going down.
So for someone to honestly say no indictments, they must be thinking of very specific high level individuals. Or else they are blind to everything going on. They must be blind to all of the changes at DOJ. Surely someone like Toensig is well aware of that.
It would be most helpful to have all of the unredacted 'Scope' memo(s).
Are you suggesting that they are not taking orders from Adam Schiffless? 🤡
I want Q Posts! Lots is breaking loose.
QOVFEFE™
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
