Replies

I’ll bring this Anon Post over from the last thread, since it’s something
For all to consider...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Whats up nightshift f****ts. Im working on a theory entitled
“A Social Engineering Perspective on Q”

TLDR: Q prevented a falsely engineered civil war in America.

On the surface, Q is a backchannel communication program
designed by the Trump administration maintaining plausible
deniability while feeding misinformation to bad actors and
create chaos and narrative confusion in their ranks. Some
connections are confirmed while others are broken or plainly
false. We already know Trump’s strategy involves controlled
leaks of all kinds coming various angles to expose deep
state agents, discredit the media and exercise control of
the Narrative.

Think of Q as just one version of this strategy playing out
in the Patriot anon’s sphere. Every time a major player or
news organization prints a story that turns out to be
completely false, that is more evidence of Q-like
intelligence channels feeding misinformation intentionally
to achieve an objective.

Secondarily, Q is a catch-all to deescalate ‘at risk’
military aged patriots from organizing any counter
revolution or violent fomentation by opening up at least
some level of communication direct to his support base. Q
occupies us and leads us away from violent and vengeful
thinking while Trump and his team carries out Plan A.

If it is plainly evident that Soros and others (ABC the Good
Fight kek) have attempted to ESCALATE the brainwashed masses
into a “resistance” frenzy… the Q program intends to prevent
that boiling over into open conflict. Imagine a world where
all we had was Trump’s twitter and the MSM. I don’t believe
patriots would have unilaterally agreed to allow the charade
to continue as it unfolded over the past two years.

If you are mad at Q, I challenge you to see it for what it
actually is. If you are upset that your time was wasted..
and you felt you would have revolted and taken judgement
into your own hands without being “misled” by Q, then you
are living proof that the program is a resounding success.

In reality, the worst case is that ultimately Trump fails
and we are forced to finally take care of the matter
ourselves.. However, it is foolish to attempt anything now
while at least our apparent ally holds the seat of power in
the country. Vigilance yes. Violence, No. Not just yet.

If there was anything “Q” that was objectively accurate from
a future past perspective, it was the assurance of the
insulation of POTUS during the special counsel investigation
when every news agency vehemently reported that Mueller was
indeed going to take out Trump. In my opinion, patriots
would not have been able to contain that level of pressure.
Without Q, I think there is no doubt we would have
experienced Nationalist patriot coordinated attacks on
globalist controlled infrastructure.

With the global media at large, the “white Nazi resurgence”
narrative would have been completed and America itself would
be in a position not unlike pre-war 1930s Germany in view of
the rest of the world. Very easy to convince the globalist
controlled European states to rise up against the great Nazi
America beast as righteous anti-racist coalition and
essentially re-enact World War II geopolitics in a sickening
casting reversal. If you pay close attention to major media
and entertainment, (Charlottesville rally, Amazon’s Man in
the High Castle, Bethesda Softwork’s Wolfenstein II The New
Colossus, Ubisoft’s The Division 2 etc.) you will see the
predictive programming’s attempt to create a believable
“Nazi’s in America” scenario.

This destabilization program is why the democrat left seems
to be in another world. They actually are. Many Americans
were successfully programmed to see a “New Nazi uprising”
that they now must “resist” like their French progenitors in
WWII. It is very real to them. Trump and the Q program
actually STOPPED most of us from unwittingly performing an
active role as “Nazi villains” in this globalist concocted
civil war scenario. The language they continue to use in
describing Trump and his base is the ultimate window into
the social engineering the globalists have attempted to
enact. When you feel the urge to civil war, try to keep this
in mind.

Now we can all watch the next months unfold and evaluate in
retrospect if Trump has accomplished enough to warrant our
further support of a second term and ongoing peaceful civic
responsibility.

HUNTER AND JOE

Rudy Giuliani lays out the story of Hunter Biden in the Ukraine and the need for investigation. Hunter was kicked out of military for testing positive for drugs…. Got this huge natural gas company position in Ukraine. Fascinating interview of Rudy on Laura Ingraham show on 5/9/19 Episode 92, in first portion of the show after intro monolog.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10290102/?ref_=ttrel_rel_tt
[As I write this, there is no clip available on the link - perhaps there will be later]

TRANSCRIPT [of entire segment - only the part relating to Joe and Hunter is cited:]

https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/giuliani-mueller-concluded-don-jr-did-nothing-wrong

SNIP

INGRAHAM: All right, Rudy I want to move on to the backlash you’ve been receiving for calling on the DOJ, I guess to investigate Biden and his family. And I’ve talked about this before on the show and these questionable ties to the Ukraine, especially the sweetheart payday. Hunter Biden ended up getting away with a fund there. Here are just a few of the examples. Let’s listen.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Giuliani, the President’s personal attorney has been really pushing the Justice Department to go hard on Hunter Biden’s ties to Ukraine.
CHRIS HAYES, HOST, ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES: It is a blatant move to use a foreign power to tarnish Trump’s potential general election opponent.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Rudy Giuliani is telegraphing it. It’s clearly Hunter and in some ways, they almost want to create a foreign interference, throw in the Ukraine and the Russians and Giuliani has been to the Ukraine. He’s got Ukrainian clients.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

GIULIANI: They’re out of their minds.

INGRAHAM: Well, listen to this Rudy. Hold on. Just within the last hour, it gets better. The New York Times posted this story online “Giuliani plans Ukraine trip to push for inquiries that could help Trump.” Like you’re not allowed to travel apparently Rudy to help your clients.

GIULIANI: Well, I’m his lawyer. One of the things lawyers do when you defend a client is to develop innocent hypotheses explanations of what your client was charged with. Well, the fact is that this was a massive collusion between the Democratic National Committee, officials of the Obama administration. Clinton people and the Ukrainian officials, corrupt officials who by the way were pro-Russian corrupt officials to create false information about Trump, about Manafort. This is real, not collusion, conspiracy to present false information and to leak it to the press and to give it to the FBI.

The Ukrainian government is presently investigating it. My aim is to make sure that Soros representatives who has a lot of influence in that government and a very highly corrupt Ukrainian, who actually participated in creating a false document about Paul Manafort. Actually, he’s been found guilty of that by a Ukrainian court.

INGRAHAM: Yes, I saw that.

GIULIANI: That they do not prevent the continuation of this investigation which they are trying to do. All I want the Ukrainian government to do is investigate and don’t let these people buffalo you. And that’s what they’re trying to do. Now Biden—

INGRAHAM: Why is the media interested in this. Why isn’t the media pursuing this?

GIULIANI: Because the media is totally corrupt.

INGRAHAM: Why not this. I mean it’s a fascinating story and everyone—

GIULIANI: It’s a big story. It’s a dramatic story and I guarantee you; Joe Biden will not get to Election Day without this being investigated, not because I want to see him investigated. This is collateral to what I was doing. But here are the facts Laura. Joe Biden was appointed the point man for Ukraine. Two to three weeks later, his son Hunter who had just been tossed out of the military for testing positive to cocaine was appointed to a position on the most corrupt agency or the most corrupt business in Ukraine.

A natural gas business called Burisma, which was headed by an oligarch, who was being protected by Putin in Russia and Biden’s kid took down about $3 million to $4 million we can count. And Biden when the kid got under investigation actually says, I strong armed the President of the Ukraine to dismiss the prosecutor, because the son of a - I’ll leave it out, was corrupt. What he left out of the explanation was that prosecutor was right on the tail of his son looking for the money that appeared to have been laundered from Latvia to Croatia to America. And when he tried to get the Croatian government to give the amount of money that Hunter Biden received, all of a sudden the President of the Ukraine gets a call from the Vice President of the United States and he’s told you’re not going to get your $1.2 billion loan guarantee which they needed then to prevent default unless you dismiss the prosecutor. The President didn’t want to do it. He was the godfather of the prosecutor’s children. He didn’t want to do it.

INGRAHAM: This is like a Jane Patterson novel.

GIULIANI: Now, if you tell me this doesn’t get investigated between now and Election Day, then our justice system is as corrupt as The Washington Post, CNN—

INGRAHAM: No experience in this.

GIULIANI: If you change the names here Laura, to Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr., this will be—
INGRAHAM: Forget it.

GIULIANI: On the front page of every one of those newspapers and all over CNN for the last four weeks. THIS IS THE BEST EVIDENCE I HAVE SEEN OF MEDIA CORRUPTION.

SNIP

[So Rudy’s commentary not only takes in the criminality of Joe and Hunter, but he also sees this incident as a PRIME EXAMPLE of MEDIA CORRUPTION. Rudy doesn’t just arbitrarily toss around words.....could we see this story again sometime?]

*texokie goes into the Qanteen Qitchen to prepare the popcorn, brew the covfefe, and pile trays with movie watching food....*

SAM CLOVIS

I have been getting caught up with watching some Hannity episodes over the past few days.

5/8/19 - Hannity show
[I searched for a clip of the Sarah Carter portion, but was unable to find one. The only link I could find was on a facebook link, topnewsshow. It was the end of a Trump rally on the 8th that night, and Sara Carter appeared after the rally on Hannity.... FB was pushing me to accept cookies, so I could not thumb through nor watch it without submitting to their blackmail.]

I was able to find links on youtube - but they have been pulled like this one, which I find strange:

Sean Hannity Fox News 5/8/19 | Sean Hannity May 8, 2019
Search domain www.youtube.com/watch?
v=2uhttLWieGYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uhttLWieGY

Sean Hannity Fox News 5/8/19 | Sean Hannity May 8, 2019. Sean Hannity Fox News 5/8/19 | Sean Hannity May 8, 2019. Skip navigation Sign in. ... Fox News Shows 105 views. New; 40:28.

At any rate:

Sarah Carter on 5/8/19 Hannity mentioned Sam Clovis. I had not heard of him. She was making the point that he was one of the ones who was hounded out of serving at the White House under Donald Trump.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Clovis

He is an amazing guy - From Kansas - Air Force academy - fighter pilot/instructor. Has been a talk show host. 2012 campaigned with Santorum. Professor at Morningside college. Pursued his own political career.
Clovis became national cochairman of Trump’s campaign team and served as a frequent spokesperson on cable news

He was drawn into the Special Counsel investigation, having been reported to have made some statements about the George Papadopoulos situation, which he has denied saying. He removed himself from consideration as the Under Secretary of Agriculture when he became enmeshed in the investigation.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Somehow I had managed not to delete that episode yet. The Sarah comment about Sam Clovis begins in about the last 10 minutes of the show. She is appearing with Gregg Jarrett.
Here is a transcript of Sara’s brief comment about Sam Clovis:

Hannity was commenting about the dems not giving up the narrative, and they continue to hound people. That hounding is expensive because they have to hire Washington DC lawyers who charge up to a thousand dollars an hour. “This is about harassment.”

SARAH:
“That’s right Sean, and it happened to General Flynn, and we see what happened to the other people who testified, like Sam Clovis. I mean, they are continually dragging it out. I think the American people realize what is going on here. This has been so highly politicized. The President did the right thing by invoking Executive Privilege over the Mueller Report. Attorney General Barr has given every chance - every chance for Representative Nadler to review this....”

I’m wondering why Sara brought up Sam Clovis’ name ... and will we be hearing more about him in the news?

EVELYN FARKAS - TRIP DOWN MEMORY LANE and DEEP DIVE DOWN INTO THE MEMORY HOLE

A couple of days ago, the friendly little gnome who lives in my youtube program brought me a Hannity clip. At first I thought it was a new one which I had missed. As I listened, I realized it was actually an old one.... March 30, 2017, to be specific.

The title is, “Hannity: Former Obama official is trying to change her tune” and deals with that story early in the Trump administration in which people leaving the government were admonishing their colleagues to collect information/data while they are remaining in their positions. The clip lasts 8:20.

For those who may wish to refresh themselves on that clip, here is the URL:

https://youtu.be/11wJ8r6b3iA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11wJ8r6b3iA

Hannity’s final excellent question was “we need to know what Evelyn Farkas knows about unmasked sources.”

Yeah!!! We do! Please somebody ask her!!

I was left with wondering why in the world have we not heard much about that story - especially in light of recent findings by the Mueller Report. I was also asking myself, as slate.com was, “Who the Hell Is Evelyn Farkas?”

[https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/03/who-the-hell-is-evelyn-farkas.html]

The above Slate article contains a transcript of the conversation Farkas had with Joe and Mika which started the whole kerfuffle. That transcript will be posted as an addendum to this multipart examination.

I was further asking, not only who is she, but how did she get to be someone people were listening to? It turns out that she actually is quite accomplished in a very derpish sort of way.

We will be exploring her own background and a bit about her father and some of the organizations with which she has connections later on.

In that above Slate article, there is a quote by Sean Spicer which makes clear the gravity of the situation:

“White House press secretary Sean Spicer referenced Farkas by name: “I think that the revelations of Evelyn Farkas —who played a senior role in the Obama administration —going on the record to talk about how they politically used CLASSIFIED INFORMATION is troubling.”

Zero Hedge gives us a bit of insight into how the controversy started, and asks some its own questions.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-29/if-evelyn-farkas-resigned-2015-how-did-she-have-access-trump-russian-intelligence

“This was making waves yesterday, after Evelyn Farkas admitted to Mika from The Morning Joe show that she strongly advised people ‘on the hill’ and in our intelligence agencies to tuck away intelligence regarding Russo-Trump ties for the sake of preservation, in an effort to protect it from the onerous bureaucracy she obviously finds to be deplorable.”

There seems to be a little bit of a timing glitch which Zero Hedge noticed.

“…the bigger red flag here is Dr. Farkas wasn’t employed by the Obama administration at the time the Russian allegations arose. According to Pentagon records, DR. FARKAS RESIGNED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2015.”

AS AN OUTSIDER TO THE ADMINISTRATION, SHE SHOULD NOT, OFFICIALLY, HAVE HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THAT KIND OF CONCERN. In my mind it serves to highlight how these people talk to each other regardless of official barriers, if it serves their agenda. She was working for Hillary at that time as an advisor.

The Zero Hedge article contained a clip presumably showing the Joe and Mika conversation, but it has been pulled from youtube. That seemed to be the fate of many of the clips connected with this story. So many have been swept into the Memory Hole.

Next, we will look at a brief summary of her education and family.

[As per custom, all parts of this dig will be posted as replies to the Jumping Dinosaur/Dragon in post 8]

END PART ONE

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

EVELYN FARKAS and the MEMORY HOLE
PART TWO
BIO and BRIEF LOOK AT FAMILY CONNECTIONS

Not much is actually given of Evelyn’s personal life in her wiki article, nor in numbers of other articles about her.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_Farkas

A related site, wikifame, has her claiming “USA” as her birthplace.
https://www.wikifame.org/wiki/Evelyn-Farkas

Most of the information given in the various bios has only to do with her professional accomplishments. I will only mention a few of them:

From wikipedia:

She served as Obama’s Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine, Eurasia.

Farkas obtained her B.A. from Franklin and Marshall College, graduating in 1989, and her M.A. and Ph.D. from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

In 2008, she served as executive director of the congressionally mandated Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism,

She served as a professional staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

She has been a busy lady. She served FOUR YEARS ON THE FACULTY OF THE U.S. MARINE CORPS COMMAND AND STAFF COLLEGE, MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY AS assistant professor and then associate professor of international relations.

[Well, that is disturbing, but probably only to be expected.]

Farkas is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, International Institute for Security Studies, and Women in International Security Studies and is on the advisory board for the Harold Rosenthal Fellowship in International Relations and the Aspen Institute Socrates Scholar Program.

In 2005 she served on a Council of Foreign Relations task force chaired by Samuel R. Berger and Brent Scowcroft that produced a monograph ‘In the Wake of War: Improving U.S. Post-Conflict Capabilities’

[I wonder if that could that be a code-title which ought to say “how to pick up the swag after we have our little false flag??? No surely not. We are dealing with serious people here who are way too smart for the rest of us.]

This is the extent of personal life which she admits to on her wiki page:

Farkas’s father is Charles Farkas
She has a younger sister Maria Farkas-Szokolai
She is of Hungarian descent and speaks English, Hungarian, and German as well as some French, Spanish, Serbo-Croatian, Bosnian, and Hindi.

I looked for information on her sister, Maria, but was not able to find anything substantive. I found a news article from Yale Daily News regarding a Maria Farkas in April 2003, who was a research fellow at the Hudson Institute. Hu Jintao was visiting Yale and she gave some quotes about his anticipated remarks. However, I was unable to absolutely nail down if that is the Maria Farkas in question.

http://yaledailynews.com/blog/2006/04/03/chinese-president-to-speak-at-yale-april-21/

Nevertheless, I was able to find information about Evelyn’s father, Charles Farkas. We will begin with that in Part Three.

END PART TWO

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

EVELYN FARKAS and the MEMORY HOLE
PART THREE
CHARLES FARKAS, HER FATHER

Charles Farkas is Chairman of the Board of Medicinal Genomics

GENOMICS?

https://www.medicinalgenomics.com/team/charles-farkas/

Charles’ daughter, Evelyn Farkas. Note the SES keystone flag which she seems so proudly to represent:

His primary focus over the past 37 years has been healthcare. He was the founder of Bain and Company’s Hospital Consulting Practice in 1985.

Yes, the “Bain and Company” referred to here is the same company which spun off the Bain Capital which was headed by Mitt Romney.

He has written the books, “Maximum Leadership,” articles in the Harvard Business Review, Fortune, In Vivo, and other publications.

According to this web site, he earned his MBA from Harvard Business School. He is a graduate of Princeton University where he received a Bachelor of Arts in History with honors. From 1976-1978, Farkas was ITT International Fellow in Manilla, Phillipines.

That means he started up the Bain and Company’s Hospital Consulting Practice only two years after his time in the Philippines.

While he was in the Philippines, some of the things which happened are listed on the following wiki page. He may not have been involved in any, but these were going on around him:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_in_the_Philippines

One example:
"August 21-27 – World Law Conference was held in Manila. On August 22, during the event, President Marcos announces amnesty for some persons "deemed guilty of subversion."

What is going on with respect to the stories of Charles Farkas' bio(s)?
https://www.altamontcapital.com/employee/chuck-farkas/

The bio on the book link from the Evelyn wiki page states:
"He went on to become director of the Briarcliff Manor Public Library, where he worked from 1968 until his retirement in 1996."

And no mention of the two years he spent in the Philippines? Or Harvard Biz?

We learn at this link that Charles Farkas is an “Operating Partner” with Altamont Capital Partners.”

“He joined Bain & Company in 1979.”

That would be right after his ITT fellowship. I have been unable to find what he was doing in the Philippines. Odd place for a librarian. I can ONLY SPECULATE. We know from digs from last summer that the Philippines figures mightily in the derp illegal/human trafficking efforts. I can only wonder if he was involved in helping to set that all up. Again pure and unsubstantiated SPECULATION. What was he doing there that prepped him so strongly for his 37 year career in HEALTHCARE?

“Outside of Bain, Chuck serves as a co- partner of Partners Healthcare and is a member of the Boards of Harvard Medical School, CONMED Corporation (NASDQ) and privately held companies Legacy ER, CHE Behavioral Health and Courtagen.”

“CONMED”…. Now there is an in-your-face acronym if I ever saw one. Same with “CHE Behavioral Health.” I guess they might want their patients to behave like Che Guevara. /sarc

But it is interesting to see his involvement with behavioral areas of medicine… as well as genomics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITT_International_Fellowship_Program

The ITT International Fellowship Program is similar to that of the Fullbright program, and was ended in the mid 80s. It was in some ways more prestigious because they gave more money than the Fullbright.

Charles also wrote the book, “Vanished by the Danube, Peace, War, Revolution, and Flight to the West.

I obtained this link from Evelyn Farkas' wikipage.

http://www.sunypress.edu/images/Product/icon/62751_cov.jpg

The complete biographic blurb is from the above link regarding his book:

“Charles Farkas was born in 1925 in Budapest, Hungary. In 1949, he earned a double doctorate in law and political science from the University of Pázmány Péter. After the failure of the 1956 Hungarian uprising, Farkas fled to the United States, where he received a master’s in library science from Columbia University. He went on to become director of the Briarcliff Manor Public Library, where he worked from 1968 until his retirement in 1996. He and his wife, Edit, live in Chappaqua, New York. They have four children and, as of early 2013, four grandchildren.”

The Altamont Capital Investment bio shows the following, which more closely matches the Genomics bio blurb:

“He earned an MBA from Harvard Business School and is a graduate of Princeton University, where he received a Bachelor of Arts in History with honors. He was also an ITT International Fellow (Fulbright program) in Manila, Philippines.”

MBA from Harvard Biz? Princeton with History? What happened to Columbia and the quiet Librarian slaving away in the library in Briarcliff Manor since 1968?

And for another thing, Evelyn only mentions a sister on her wiki page. Why doesn't she mention at least the existence of the other two?

Did she grow up in Chappaqua since 1968? And isn’t that the Clinton domicile selected so she could become the New York Carpetbagger Senator? Yes, it is. What a small world! Is any of this even true?

For a book review of Charles’ story escaping Communism, see here:

http://www.hungarianreview.com/article/20140514_chroniclers_of_a_vanished_world

It is his autobiography, and tells of the world on the Danube in Hungary from the time before WWII, until he escapes to the West in the mid 50’s. It sounds fascinating and perhaps one day I might have an opportunity to read it.

He describes Nazi occupation, and later escaping from the Red Army. From the book review:

“In 1947, as political control by the Communists grew, Charles’s father was sent into retirement (at the age of 51 without any pension being paid to him), and his mother, the painter, began working like a farmer’s wife. By the time the farm was put back into order and Charles finished law school the Cold War was underway and the Soviets had fully installed the Communists to run the country.”

Snip

“Although the political history of this period is rather well-known, little has been written on how the average Hungarian (who was not imprisoned) lived during those years. The struggles of Charles Farkas and his friends and relatives are an important testimony. The hardship and brutality of the first phase of Communism in Hungary explains why on 23 October 1956 the people of Budapest, mainly students and workers, demanded the end of dictatorship, why the Communist system collapsed in 24 hours, and why people resisted heroically the intervention of the Soviet army stationed in Hungary."

"Thirteen pages of the book describe Charles’s active participation in and observations on the 1956 Revolution. The acts of violence perpetrated by the Communists in front of the building of the Radio has been described by many authors and eyewitnesses, but here we learn also what happened inside, as Charles was one of those who entered the building when the revolutionaries took it over. That was enough to fear arrest and even execution when the second Soviet invasion managed to suppress the Hungarian people and brutal reprisals followed. It seemed the logical thing for him to do was to leave behind his beloved mother, friends and the country home, and to escape, ending up at Camp Kilmer in New Jersey, together with thousands of Hungarian refugees.”

I do have some questions here. He is a simple librarian with a law degree…. And yet has devoted his life to “healthcare?”

[IMHO, they way these people use so reverentially the term “HEALTHCARE” = CODEWORD: Destroy Freedom in this nation]

He escapes the Red Army…. And yet heads up a business organization which has ties to the mother company of Bain Capital, which we have learned tends to be very derpish. Isn't Mitt Romney also dedicated to "Health Care?" Charles Farkas is involved in various capacities with other very derpish organizations as well. He has a daughter who also seems to be working very hard to destroy the freedoms we have in this country along with our Constitution.

What happened to this family which escaped the Red Army, only to seemingly become the Red Army themselves in this nation of their adoption?
Is Evelyn actually a “Red Diaper" baby? She seems to act in the way one would expect of one, if that were the case.

Why the discrepancies in the two bio blurbs I located? They are definitely the same Charles Farkas, so why the disparities? The link where I got the blurb connected to the bio and the Danube book CAME FROM EVELYN’S WIKI PAGE. The other two came from his own bio blurbs in two organizations with which he has dealings.

Again, why is it reported in one place that Charles has four children, yet Evelyn only acknowledges one sister?

Others may know about this stuff better than I do, but I am beginning to wonder just what in those blurbs, and especially the “Danube” bio, could conceivably be true…. And what could be a cover story? If it is a cover story, what is it which is being covered?

Another grim question which arises in my mind is, did Soros’ and Charles Farkas’ paths ever cross in Charles' time in Hungary? It is my understanding they were both living in Hungary during the Nazi occupation, as well as at least some of the subsequent events. However, Hungary is a big place, and that is just an idle speculation. As we will learn later, Evelyn's path seems to have at least indirectly crossed Soros' path. Perhaps an Anon with better skills might be willing to look for such a connection between Charles and George S....at least to rule it out.

It should also be noted that Charles Farkas is around 94 now, if he was born in 1925. Wonder if he is spending his days in the library.

In the next part, we will begin looking more closely at some of Evelyn’s activities and connections.

END PART THREE

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

EVELYN FARKAS and the MEMORY HOLE
PART FOUR
Activities/Organizations

One of the credits on Evelyn’s resume is, “on the advisory board for the Harold Rosenthal Fellowship in International Relations.”

That sounds all warm and fuzzy. But is it?

http://rosenthalfellowship.org

“Welcome
Established in 1977 in memory of Harold W. Rosenthal, the Rosenthal Fellowship was created to expose young scholars of foreign affairs to the inner working of Congress, the US Department of State, and other agencies of the federal government. Each year, a select group of graduate students are chosen. Fellows are chosen for their outstanding scholarly achievments, for their character and for their commitment to the study of international affairs. The Rosenthal Fellows community helps the next generation have the opportunity to work in international affairs offices in the federal government.”

So we find this to be an organization for finding and collecting the best and brightest to be the next derps in line.

Here is page which the organization has thoughtfully provided listing the various winners over the years of the fellowships:

http://rosenthalfellowship.org/fd.htm

I would encourage anyone who seeks to preserve this kind of reference information to do so, for there is a great deal of data about some derpish connections and networks available which might not otherwise be noticeable - or possibly available later.

I did mini dives on several of the fellowship winners, and the connections are remarkable. I can see how there is a LOT of low hanging fruit for FReeQs and others to explore here. It was difficult to pull myself away from digging on each of them…. But there are too many. Perhaps later, if/when some of these obscure names become better known we can revisit them together.

Evelyn Farkas was a winner in 1993. She was listed as a “Senior Advisor Fletcher,” along with other accomplishments.

I studied the list and learned that quite a number of the winners were also studying at Fletcher. So what is “Fletcher?”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fletcher_School_of_Law_and_Diplomacy

“The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (known as the Fletcher School) is the graduate school of international affairs of Tufts University, in Medford, Massachusetts….”

“…The school’s alumni network numbers over 9,500 in 160 countries, and includes ambassadors, diplomats, high ranking military officers, heads of nonprofit organizations, and corporate executives….”

Wow… so just going to that school throws you into a derpish network socket all on its own. Evelyn received her MA and PhD from Fletcher, and is listed as “Senior Advisor Fletcher.” To me that means she is actually in a position to know as many of the students as she desires…. And can promote the ones she chooses. She also has in her credits, “the advisory board for the Harold Rosenthal Fellowship in International Relations”

That means that she went to a derp “international affairs” training school…. And has become a major headhunter to scout out the emerging talent for the derps.

Another accomplishment listed on Evelyn’s wiki page is the Aspen Institute Socrates Scholar Program.

This is a “rinse and repeat” of what we saw with the Harold W. Rosenthal circumstance. We have stumbled across the importance of the Aspen Institute over the past year and 1/2 of Q researching. They are definitely a seriously major organization promoting derps and more importantly, derp ideas.

The Aspen Institute Socrates Scholar Program is an arm of the Aspen Institute which seeks out and provides a forum and networking opportunities with derps of all stripes:

https://www.aspeninstitute.org/seminars/socrates-program-seminars/
“The Socrates Program provides a forum for emerging leaders from various professions to convene and explore contemporary issues….”

The program sessions are weekend long gatherings at various locations where specified derps from all over are welcomed to come speak and network.

Charles’ little Evelyn is seriously connected and plugged in, well groomed by the derps, and in turn is grooming the next batch.

We will continue to examine Evelyn’s connections in Part Five.

END PART FOUR

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

EVELYN FARKAS and the MEMORY HOLE
PART FIVE
Activities/Organizations

In Part One, we learned that Zero Hedge had discovered that Evelyn Farkas had resigned her position in the Obama administration in September 2015. Which led to a very interesting question and point:

“She was afraid the Trump people would gain access to their intelligence and whisk it away — because they’re all Russian spies, obviously. Aside from what appears to be a brazen confirmation of spying on the Trump team, the bigger red flag here is DR. FARKAS WASN’T EMPLOYED BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AT THE TIME THE RUSSIAN ALLEGATIONS AROSE. ACCORDING TO PENTAGON RECORDS, DR. FARKAS RESIGNED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2015. SO HOW DID THIS NON-RESIDENT FELLOW AT THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL, MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, AND FORMER DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RUSSIA, UKRAINE AND EURASIA, GAIN KNOWLEDGE OF INTELLIGENCE REGARDING MEMBERS OF TRUMP’S TEAM AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA, WHEN SHE WAS THE SENIOR FOREIGN POLICY ADVISOR FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HILLARY CLINTON?”

Zero Hedge does not give an answer, or if it did, via youtube clip, those have been pulled. Nevertheless, the question is still viable. And by now we can make guesses that it didn’t matter if she was officially IN the administration. She continued to be a voice and a person serving the Agenda, however that could be accomplished.

*sound of needle scraping across a vinyl record*

WAIT! BACK UP! Did you see what I just saw???

UKRAINE.

Zero Hedge is pointing out that she was one of the voices basically ginning up war with Russia by arming Ukraine:

“…Farkas was THE PRIME DRIVER behind the anti-Russia phobia inside the Pentagon during the Obama years — shilling hard for the Ukraine — REQUESTING THAT THE PRESIDENT SEND THEM ANTI-TANK MISSILES — WHICH, ESSENTIALLY, WOULD MEAN OUTRIGHT WAR WITH RUSSIA.”

Oh my dear sainted Aunt Matilda - “THE PRIME DRIVER” - Evelyn seems to definitely be a PLAYER! And a false flag hawkish one, at that.

We notice her CFR membership as a matter of course. It is also easy to find in almost any bio you find on her of her affiliation with the Aspen Socrates Program. (Lots of good stuff there, by the way) She was also selected to be a Harold Rosenthal Fellow, and later an advisor. (More good stuff - see Part Four for more detail on Aspen and Rosenthal).

However, did you also notice one of her credentials is “non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council,”

“Atlantic Council.”

“ATLANTIC COUNCIL.”

Where did we hear of that before???

Ahhhh yes. It was recently when we were exploring a bit of neonrevolt’s very long treatise on UKRAINE and the many things happening there and connected to it.

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2019/04/24/greg-craig-the-black-ledger-and-the-real-russian-collusion-story-qanon-greatawakening-neonrevolt/

We learned from neonrevolt that the Atlantic Council is a Soros-backed organization with LOTS of not just skullduggery, but also is a fountainhead of major Skull Diggers.

Neonrevolt says:
“For those who don’t know, the Atlantic Council was the group that slammed Disobedient Media when they exposed the Clintons and Laura Silsby’s child trafficking operation out of Haiti:…”

Neonrevolt quotes a Zero Hedge article:

“…The Atlantic Council has a troubling history of taking money from foreign special interest groups and government agencies in return for pushing propaganda to support various initiatives around the globe. The New York Times has named the Atlantic Council along with the Brookings Institution and the Center for Strategic and International Studies as being think tanks which have made undisclosed “agreements” with foreign governments. THE ARTICLE DENOUNCED THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL FOR HAVING “OPENED A WHOLE NEW WINDOW INTO AN ASPECT OF THE INFLUENCE-BUYING IN WASHINGTON THAT HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN EXPOSED….”

And oh my my my:

“…Atlantic Council has released a number of glowing reviews of Soros’ “philanthropic” work despite the fact that his OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION HAS RECENTLY BEEN EXPELLED FROM HUNGARY and is under audit along with affiliated NGO groups in Macedonia due to accusations of meddling in national elections and improperly seeking to influence public opinion….”

And who are we studying who are simply mired in HUNGARIAN TIES?

That’s right…our dear Charles and his bright daughter, Evelyn.
Remember, one of her credentials is “non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council.”

And finally the Zero Hedge reminder pointed at by neonrevolt:

“MOREOVER, THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL HAS A PARTNERSHIP WITH BURISMA GROUP, A UKRAINIAN NATURAL GAS COMPANY.”

“Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden sits on the board at Burisma!”

I truly did not expect to end up here in this dig. Did she play a direct part in advising Joe and Hunter? If she was beating the drum for that false flag war to happen, can we truly believe she did not at least dip in her oar to sort of nudge the Burisma scheme along?

https://heavy.com/news/2017/03/evelyn-farkas-who-is-barack-obama-administration-official-state-department-russia-background-bio-why-did-resign-resignation-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-spy-surveillance-leak-intelligence-response/

“Evelyn Farkas worked as the deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia during the administration starting in 2010.”

Zero Hedge tells us she resigned in September 2015.

From the NYT, Dec 8, 2015:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/corruption-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html

“Hunter Biden, 45, a former Washington lobbyist, joined the Burisma board in April 2014. That month, as part of an investigation into money laundering, British officials froze London bank accounts containing $23 million that allegedly belonged to Mr. Zlochevsky.”

BOOM! - that sort of gives us a strong indication that Evelyn might have been at least aware, if not an advisor, to that whole Burisma scheme. It was her area of responsibility - 2010- Sept 2015. Hunter was appointed to Burisma in 2014. She left the administration to become a Hillary Minion in September 2015.

I really do wonder if we will be hearing about her in the news again sometime. She KNOWS a lot and possibly has done more.

As Zero Hedge asks, if she had left the administration and was working with Hillary, there is no way in heck she should have had official access to the “RUSSIA!!” concerns of the time…. But since that is her area of expertise and was part of the chorus, if not a featured soloist, in the drumming up of a Derp war (false flag) between Russia and the Ukraine, perhaps the likelihood is that she was a Guiding Light, albeit relatively in the background.

Until she opened her mouth with Mika and Joe.

The timing is such that Evelyn could have been involved in putting together Hunter Biden’s involvement in Burisma. She also could have been involved in two capacities: one capacity is her sitting on the Russia/Ukraine desk in the Obama Administration, and the other is in her capacity and connections with ATLANTIC COUNCIL.

Zero Hedge said above:
“MOREOVER, THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL HAS A PARTNERSHIP WITH BURISMA GROUP, A UKRAINIAN NATURAL GAS COMPANY.”

I am becoming more and more inclined to think she may be more important to learn about than most are realizing at this moment.

Another thought just popped into my head. Atlantic Council defends child traffickers. We have learned that there is a strong rat line leading to/from the Philippines, which is where Charles cut his teeth before devoting himself to “HEALTHCARE.” I am unable to make a direct accusation about Charles’ Philippine involvement in such things, but I’m raising a VERY RED flag on this dig for both of them, Charles and Evelyn.

Please, will someone depose her? Her story - ALL of it - needs to come out of the Memory Hole, and under oath.

END PART FIVE

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

EVELYN FARKAS
ADDENDUM PART A
The conversation with Joe and Mika

According to” LeadingAuthorities,”

https://www.leadingauthorities.com/speakers/evelyn-farkas

“ Dr. Farkas appears regularly as an NBC/MSNBC national security contributor to discuss hot-button geopolitical issues. “

LOL! that’s an understatement. The following became quite the hot button issue!

Following is a transcript of the conversation Dr. Farkas had with Joe and Mika which launched the controversy. Did she confirm that “spying” had been done to the DJT campaign? We know now that really and truly she did.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/03/who-the-hell-is-evelyn-farkas.html

Who the Hell Is Evelyn Farkas?
By OSITA NWANEVU
MARCH 31, 20174:47 PM

“…Let’s start from the beginning. Early this month, the New York Times published a story about Obama administration officials working to preserve and disseminate intelligence about Russian efforts to influence November’s election across the government before President Obama left office. According to the article, officials were concerned that some of that intelligence, including intercepted communications from Russians detailing contacts with people in Trump’s circle and information on Russian meetings with Trump associates, would be “covered up or destroyed” by the Trump administration.”

The day after the story was published, MSNBC analyst and former Obama Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia and Ukraine, Evelyn Farkas appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and was asked about the article. Farkas, who left the Obama administration in 2015, told Mika Brzezinski that she had encouraged former colleagues still working in the administration and “people on the Hill” to take part in the effort to preserve intelligence and intelligence sources:

I was urging my former colleagues and frankly speaking the people on the Hill—it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people—get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration. Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left. So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy that the Trump folks—if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff, dealing with Russians—that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the Hill.

Re-read that transcript. The following is the description of Farkas’ comments given, weeks after the interview, this Wednesday by Sean Hannity on his radio show:

“If they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff, dealing with Russians, they would try to compromise sources and methods [sic].” What are the three big words of the day that I just told you about—well, four big words? Surveillance. Unmasking. Intelligence leaks. So she’s acknowledging that what Donald Trump tweeted out was correct! So she’s acknowledging there’s surveillance. Again, I go back, “If they knew how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians [sic]” — so she’s acknowledging surveillance, so that means Trump’s right. Check that off in the box….”

The analysis which continues in the Slate article, as one might expect, is spin. We will look at a better analysis in ADDENDUM Part B

END ADDENDUM PART A
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

EVELYN FARKAS
ADDENDUM PART B
Analysis of the conversation with Joe and Mika

A better analysis can be found regarding Evelyn Farkas’ remarks to Joe and Mika in this article from Town Hall which can be found here:

https://townhall.com/columnists/jackkerwick/2017/04/02/evelyn-farkass-six-revelations-about-obama-trump-and-the-deep-state-n2307464

Evelyn Farkas’s Six Revelations about Obama, Trump, and the Deep State
Posted: Apr 02, 2017 12:01 AM

Those six cited items are:

“First, Farkas here acknowledges that the Obama administration, essentially, had indeed been gathering intelligence, or spying, on private citizens.

Second, being the Democrat partisan that she obviously is, Farkas’ intention in making these comments, and making them in the left-friendly venue of MSNBC, was to suggest that the Democrats’ “The Russians Made Us Do It (Lose)” narrative has substance.

Yet, notice, Farkas never said that the intel proved anything so much as resembling “collusion” between Putin or “the Russians” and Trump. Had there been anything there, she would have done what no one has yet to do and offer at least a scintilla of evidence to substantiate this charge.

Third, in fact, Farkas never even mentions any correspondence between Trump and “the Russians.” No, she instead references “Trump folks” and “the Trump staff” when talking about Russia.

Fourth, while Farkas obviously wanted for audiences to think that Obama’s government discovered some nefarious connection between “Trump folks” and those dastardly Russians, the only allusion that she ever manages to make is to the “dealings” that she alleges transpired between these groups.
In other words, Farkas’s wording here is profoundly vague.

Fifth, Farkas unwittingly confesses that she worried about “the Trump folks” discovering “how we knew what we knew….” Is it not eminently reasonable to infer from this statement that the “how” in question, the methods by which intelligence was supposedly gathered, consists of surveillance of the “Trump folks?”

Finally, Farkas admits to being worried about how the Trump administration would react when it found out “how we knew what we knew….” Who is this “we?” Farkas was no longer in the government as of 2015. Yet her choice of words would have us think that she is still very much involved in and allied with bureaucrats in the Deep State. Moreover, given her standing as a Democrat and her position in the Obama administration, it’s all too sensible to think that Farkas’ selection of the first person-plural in this context refers to Farkas and her fellow partisans that remain embedded in the bureaucracy over which her former boss presided.

Farkas has tried retreating from her comments. The left-leaning media has been busy spinning them away. But the cat is out of the bag:
The Deep State, under Obama, surveilled American citizens, in this case, Trump and his “folks.” They wanted the information that they had gathered to be as widely disseminated—leaked—as possible.”

# # # # # #
So as we band of FReeQs, Anons, Freepers, and Lurks have learned, Evelyn spilled the beans, and perhaps without realizing it, proved that there WAS surveillance. That story was very effectively thrown into the Memory Hole by the MSM. Now that the RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! narrative has collapsed, I am wondering if we will be seeing her again. I hope we do. Can her story be pulled out of the Memory Hole?

In the process of this dig, as noted above, I did find some other interesting stuff, especially in the listings of the Rosenthal bunch and Aspen, but perhaps we’ll call it a day for this particular tunnel.

*texokie packs up her gear, ties up the shovels and puts it all on her back, and finds her way to the exit hole. She makes sure she is wearing the extra jacket Mother of Dragons insisted she wear. She finds the hose, and Mother of Dragons is kind to help her take off said jacket and hose her off. Then she helps her put away the equipment into the Qanteen Qloset…. This is no small thing, because Mother of Dragons (and Dragonlets) is the only one who can do that without risking limb and injury. For everyone else, as a routine, it means everything falls on the hapless head (or shovel on shins) of the victim - usually texokie - opening the door. *

End of Five Part dig on Evelyn Farkas, with Addendums A and B

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

BILL BARR - and “WHO KNOWS WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED?”

Lou Dobbs 5/15/19
Degenova, in discussing the good qualities of Bill Barr, states “HE KNOWS WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED.”

I decided to see what Q actually has stated/ or questioned about the Buried Body Knower.

Drops mentioning “where the bodies are buried”

#1364:
[Anon posts about Eric Prince. Then Q responds:]

“Who knows where the bodies are buried?
Re_read drops re: Who knows where….
Rudy.
Now comes the pain.
Q”

#1280
“...Why would Flynn plead guilty to something untrue?
Define testimony.
Define ‘on record’.
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
Flynn is safe.
Expand your thinking.”

#260
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
FLYNN is safe.
We protect our Patriots.
Q

#953
“...BIDEN / CHINA.
BIG DEVELOPMENT.
TRAITORS EVERYWHERE.
AMERICA FOR SALE.
FLYNN.
Targeted.
Why?
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES.
TRUMP ADMIN v2?
Election theft.
Last hope.
Congressional focus.
Impeach....”

#224
[Anon posted info about Eric Prince. Q responded:]
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
The map is in front of you.
Re-read.
Expand your thinking.
Purpose for time being spent here.
Q

#97
“...What is Flynn’s background?
What was his rank?
Was he involved in intel ops?
What access or special priv?
Why is this relevant?
Set up.
Who wins?
Who becomes exposed?
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
Who has access?...”

As in #1364, Rudy has been exposing Biden skullduggery in the Ukraine, and along with that, the Biden involvement in China.

The question is asked in proximity to Gen Flynn in #1280 and #260 “who knows where the bodies are buried?” But note that Q does not ever say that Flynn IS the one who knows. It is only implied by that proximity.

Again in #953, we see the proximity of the buried body question to Gen Flynn... but also in proximity to the issues Rudy is recently addressing, ie, Hunter Biden, Ukraine, and China. So Rudy stays in contention for the Buried Body Knower.

#224 brings that question once more in proximity to Eric Prince. Is HE the Buried Body Knower?

In #97 the question is again in proximity to Gen Flynn, continuing to imply HE is the one who knows where the bodies are buried. But again it doesn’t outright say that. There is yet room for there being another who might know.

I’m beginning to think that we might have SEVERAL people among the Patriots helping Trump, who “know where the bodies are buried!”

And those might even include ones who by virtue of their positions, like Rudy, perhaps Eric Prince, and even perhaps Bill Barr, (as per DeGenova), must be brought into that knowledge.

As Q hints, perhaps Flynn may truly have been the initial one who knows where the bodies are buried...and told Trump.... but I’m getting from the above that Flynn AND MI were the ones who knew where the bodies were buried.

Let’s look a little further:

In number 14, perhaps we have a clue as to who is the Buried Body Knower:

#14

“...What was Flynn’s background?
Why is this relevant?
Why did Adm R (NSA) meet Trump privately w/o auth?
Does POTUS know where the bodies are buried?
Does POTUS have the goods on most bad actors?
Was TRUMP asked to run for President?
Why?
By Who?...”

snip

“...What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines?
Why is this important?
What is Mueller’s background? Military?
Was Trump asked to run for President w/ assurances made to prevent tampering?
How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead?
Who is helping POTUS?...”

Look at
#1978

“...Why did POTUS refuse ‘select’ PDBs during transition?
Who knew?
Threat assessment.
Adm Rogers?
FLYNN?
Why did HUSSEIN + HRC + ADMIN + Staff + … use private emails to communicate? ...”

Well, who else is “MI - Military Intelligence?” While Q doesn’t ask that question about who knows where the bodies are buried in proximity to Adm Rogers... I’m wondering if HE might be one, along with Flynn, who truly knows. Because of the NSA and technologies run by the NSA, could it truly be Admiral Rogers - along with Flynn - who is/are the REAL Buried Body Knower(s)?.... and who themselves also shared that info with DJT and recruited him to be POTUS?

Part A

Please Quote Post to Which You Are Replying

Part B

Please Use Graphic Content Warnings

Part C

All 8ch links and link variations are prohibited