You Are Now More Likely To Know A Prostitute Than A Primetime CNN Viewer

Townhall ^ | May 4, 2019 | Timothy Meads

[9YearLurker]

Those are high-end call guys and girls — for ugly people.

[eclecticEel]

That’s 760,000 concurrent viewers, not 760,000 total.

[crz]

Reading the replies here and I agree. I would trust the prostitute over them. Especially a politician.

[crz]

Those are the pimps. The staffers I mean.

[golux]

I’d rather get fake orgasms than fake news.

Heck, at least your average prostitute doesn't want to destroy capitalism, bring down Israel, eliminate individual liberty, and dissolve the Constitution, all with a high pay check and outrageous benefits. Come to think of it it wouldn't be a bad idea if the members of the oldest profession took over for for the elected members of the second-oldest profession! At least the former WORK for a living and know how to please their clients!

[redshawk]

You get more honesty from the prostitute
“””””
Shhhhh . ....

[Trump.Deplorable]

It shocks and saddens me if that many people are involved in prostitution.

---

Depends on how you define “prostitute”, if you think about it, all women are technically “prostitutes”.

You don’t see women marrying up all the hobos now do you?

What’s the old saying ‘All men pay for sex, one way or another, whether it is a few hundred bucks or half of everything he owns.....’

[TigersEye]

I don’t know any prostitutes. I’ve also never seen an episode of SpongeBob SquarePants but re-runs of it are beating CNN primetime in the ratings.

[Reily]

There’s a difference?
Who knew?

[Scram1]

There is no value in CNN news content.
The branch bank I use has a painting of a whorehouse listed in the National Register on the wall—gift wrapped at Christmas time.
One could only gift wrap CNN—no value—to give away.

https://tinyurl.com/yyky78cx

[MrEdd]

The article didn't specify a prostitute who was active, nor did it specify a full time prostitute.

The greater number of prostitutes (as far as total quantity of people providing sex for material gain) only work to fill a specific need, not all the time. They usually quit fairly young.

The general public immediately thinks of full time prostitutes in brothels, on the street, or working for escort agencies because those are the ones who get arrested or whom authors and journalists can find.

If you look at the total numbers then yeah the article is likely accurate - but who cares about CNN anyway?

[clamper1797]

867-5309

[Larry Lucido]

Indeed.

[9YearLurker]

I still don’t buy the numbers. Folks involved in almost any cause come up with overstated figures.

[Bonemaker]

“Anyone know the name of a reliable prostitute?

They are mythological creatures created by male fantasy.

[TChad]

Anyone know the name of a reliable prostitute?

I don't even know the names of any unreliable prostitutes.

Unfortunately, I do know some CNN viewers.

[Bommer]

Funny how a new organization is being referred to as a whore, but it’s considered lower than one.

[dp0622]

And your money isn’t as wasted.

Although it’s a sin and I look down on it.

(PC comment thrown in to cover myself :) )

[Berlin_Freeper]

A CNN viewer probably pays a prostitute just to watch CNN with him.

[glorgau]

So true. I don’t know any prime time CNN viewers.