|
Posted on 05/03/2019 2:26:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Yes, I thought @jackhole might behave himself after the meeting. But no, he’s accelerating. Interesting to see what happens. Trump has tweeted about this a lot lately.
BTW this might be interesting:
US official: Intel indicates Iran moved missiles by boat
May 7, 2019
https://www.stripes.com/us-official-intel-indicates-iran-moved-missiles-by-boat-1.580068
WASHINGTON — The decision to send an aircraft carrier and a group of Air Force bombers to the Middle East was based in part on intelligence indications that Iran had moved short-range ballistic missiles by boat in waters off its shores, an American official said Tuesday.
The movement, first reported by CNN, was among a range of recent indications that Iran might be considering or preparing to attack U.S. forces in the region, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss sensitive intelligence.
The official said it was not clear whether the boats with missiles represented a new military capability that could be used against U.S. forces or were only being moved to shore locations.
Shouldn't take that much. Once she ignites, she'll go up like a tallow candle.
He’s letting it get so bad people will demand action. I hope.
Cates’ take connected to Wray’s testimony today.
Thanks to Moonman62, here is the transcript and audio:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?460435-1/fbi-director-wray-word-spying-describe-surveillance&start=268
Cates:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1125911567734800385.html
Here’s Jeff Carlson .@themarketswork of @EpochTimes setting the record straight after much media mis-reporting of Wray’s testimony today.
FBI Director Cites Ongoing Investigation in Response to Spying Question
FBI Director Christopher Wray testified before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee on May 7, and was asked a series ...
It is being reported by the usual suspects today that Wray DENIED in his testimony there was any spying on the Trump campaign.
This is how grifters get an audience: you don’t watch/read Wray’s testimony yourselves, you listen to people who make false representations about it.
If Jeff walks you through what Wray actually said today and you tell me you ‘don’t buy it’ then real news reporting is just not for you.
Media outlets DELIBERATELY MISREPRESENTED TO YOU what Wray said in his testimony and if you come BITCHING to me or Jeff for correcting the record, it’s clear you’re wasting your time reading us.
Fly, be free!
We’ll be over here ACCURATELY REPORTING/COMMENTING on what actually happened, giving people the real news, not pimping narratives that involved misrepresenting what actually happened.
If you have a problem with that....
“Sometimes it seems like if it can be programmed, it can be hacked.”
That’s because it can. Nothing connected to the Internet is completely safe. I say this coming from a career in IT. Safe systems are airgapped from the Internet with no possibility of remote access, they are still vulnerable to local and physical access, but that’s infinitely more manageable. We do our best and are very successful, but you would be amazed at the sheer quantity of activity we have to defend against.
My desire would be to seriously up the penalties for illegal hacking. I’m talking FBI raids, major felonies and we take the worst ones out like terrorists if they are outside CONUS. Block whole countries or carriers if they don’t make progress. We seem to just accept hackers and try to close holes after they are discovered, but there is no effort to seriously pursue them. I’m would even entertain the death penalty for the worst offenders, say the ones who use the information to seriously harm over a certain number of people in certain ways.
My $.02
From link above:
Contrary to media reporting, Wray did not deny that spying on the Trump campaign occurred
Director Christopher Wray testified before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee on May 7, and was asked a series of questions on the topic of spying and surveillance on the Trump campaign by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.).
Wray’s answers have been widely misrepresented and misreported. Media outlets such as The Washington Post and CNN published headlines claiming that Wray had said there was no evidence of spying on the Trump campaign. There were also multiple claims that Wray had directly refuted statements by Attorney General William Barr.
The problem is, that wasn’t what Wray had actually said. And some of his answers came from questions that had nothing to do with the Trump campaign.
With regard to Wray’s comments on ”spying,” he was actually responding to a question regarding the FBI’s normal operations:
Shaheen: I’d like to follow up on Senator Moran’s question about the hearing we had with Attorney General Barr. Because, I was very concerned by his use of the word “spying” which I think is a very loaded word. It conjures up a criminal connotation. I want to ask you and I’d appreciate a “yes” or “no” answer if possible.
When FBI agents conduct investigations against alleged mobsters, suspected terrorists, other criminals, do you believe that they’re engaging in “spying” when they’re following FBI investigative policies and procedures?
Wray: Well, that’s not the term I would use.
Wray’s comment was immediately seized upon by many in the media and led to claims that the FBI director had testified there was no spying in relation to the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign. Politico even led with the headline, “FBI’s Wray: Spying is ‘not the term I would use’ to describe Trump campaign probe.” Note that Wray was responding to the everyday activities of the FBI, not specifically to the activities surrounding the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign.
There have also been a number of articles published claiming that Wray was publicly taking issue with Barr’s use of the word “spying,” although that is not what Wray said.
Shaheen continued with her questioning and Wray provided an answer that is getting little attention, although it probably should. Wray stated that he was less concerned with what the investigative activity was actually termed and far more concerned with the intent that lay behind the investigations.
Shaheen: I would say that’s a “no” to that question.
Wray: Well, I mean, look, lots of people have different colloquial phrases. I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes. And to me the key question is making sure that it’s done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That’s the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases.
The questioning then shifted more directly to the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign and efforts by the FBI to obtain warrants. Wray noted that there had been “a number” of unspecified warrants issued:
Shaheen: Did FBI Agents get warrants for information as part of their counter-surveillance investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election?
Wray: Well, I want to be a little bit careful about what I can discuss here, but I think it’s been publicly disclosed that there were a number of relevant warrants that were secured in the course of that investigation.
We know that there was at least one FISA warrant on former Trump adviser Carter Page. There may have been others as well. Former Trump adviser George Papadopoulos and former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort have both been mentioned as possibilities.
Shaheen then asked Wray if the FBI spied on the Trump campaign. Wray was very careful in his answer. Note that, despite the many misleading headlines claiming otherwise, this is the only place where Shaheen actually asked directly about spying in relation to the Trump campaign:
Shaheen: And do you believe, Director Wray, that the FBI and its agents spied into the 2016 presidential campaign operation?
Wray: Well, again, I want to be careful about how I answer that question here because there is an ongoing inspector general investigation. I have my own thoughts based on the limited information I’ve seen so far but I don’t think it would be right or appropriate for me to share those at this stage, because I really do think it’s important for everybody to respect the independent inspector general’s investigation, which I think this line of questioning starts to implicate and I think it’s very important for everybody to be able to have full confidence in his review.
Wray confirmed the ongoing FISA investigation being conducted by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz but was careful not to comment on it. Nor did Wray confirm or deny spying on the Trump campaign. Also of note, Wray did not in any way dispute Shaheen’s use of the word “spied.”
Shaheen tried one last time to establish that there had been no illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign. Wray’s answer provided a host of additional headlines:
Shaheen: At this time do you have any evidence that any illegal surveillance into the campaigns or individuals associated with the campaigns by the FBI occurred?
Wray: I don’t think I personally have any evidence of that sort.
Wray’s answer is given greater context in video form, in which it can be seen that Wray paused prior to answering and emphasized the words “I personally,” but the damage was done and the sound bite obtained.
NBC News promptly issued an article titled “FBI chief Wray refutes Barr, says no ‘spying’ on Trump campaign.” The Washington Post published no less than three different articles on Wray’s statements, including one titled “FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign.”
The FBI isn’t investigating itself and Wray hasn’t been tasked with investigating potential FISA abuse or FBI activities during the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign. That matter has been left to IG Horowitz, whose report is currently scheduled to be delivered before the end of June.
The FISA investigation is one of several investigations coming to an end. There is also the matter of the 14 criminal referrals made by special counsel Robert Mueller as an outgrowth of his investigation. Two of these, former Obama White House counsel Greg Craig and Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, are publicly known. The other 12 haven’t been revealed and are fully redacted in the Mueller report.
Barr recently acknowledged that there were a variety of investigations related to the investigations into the Trump campaign, during testimony before a House Appropriations subcommittee, noting, “One of the things I want to do is pull together all the information from the various investigations that have gone on.”
nite
Hallelujah!!
From your keyboard to God’s ear.
Intel crab has me blocked.
What the hell did I do to him?
Can someone ask him to unblock me?
I’m a good girl, honest.
.@seanhannity: "To what extent will the conscience of the American people, in your view, be shocked?"
.@SaraCarterDC: "They will be extraordinarily shocked...I mean...this is gonna be an avalanche of information. People will be indicted because of this." pic.twitter.com/V34PcecuYj— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) May 8, 2019
🚨NEW🚨
9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel AGREES to allow the Trump administration to continue its policy of forcing some migrants to remain in Mexico for the duration of their asylum case.
The panel agreed to stay the SF federal court injunction of the policy pending appeal.— Hamed Aleaziz (@Haleaziz) May 8, 2019
NEW: @GovRonDeSantis says he will sign into law the bill that will require people with felony convictions to pay financial obligations before they can vote https://t.co/uGL9Jce1Sf— Kira Lerner (@kira_lerner) May 7, 2019
Wrap your minds around this: If the Palestinians threw their weapons down tomorrow, there would be peace. If the Israelis threw their weapons down tomorrow, there would be genocide.— Robert J. O'Neill (@mchooyah) May 7, 2019
Shaheen asked Wray when FBI agents investigate alleged mobsters, terrorists, & criminals if it's considered spying if they adhere to FBI policies/procedures. Wray said he wouldn't call THAT spying. His key phrase > "making sure it's done by the book". SpyGate was NOT by the book! https://t.co/TQJVuOJjpV— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) May 7, 2019
Reminder...for those saying Wray is "part of the Swamp/Deep State." pic.twitter.com/rHJxALVqvN— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) May 8, 2019
Click to hear or read transcript: This piece has the full clip/transcript showing what Shaheen asked Wray and how he answered. He was very careful in his responses. Note he tells her he is working closely w/Barr to get to the bottom of how this Russia investigation got started.https://t.co/2h7VHDYUf3— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) May 7, 2019
1) “I, personally, don’t have any evidence of that sort”
He could have just said “no”. But he didn’t. He specified that HE doesn’t have any evidence on it.
We all know full well that the IG, oversight watchdog of DOJ/FBI, has this evidence.
Wray is covertly tipping anons off. https://t.co/JBgoIVPp7n— Sneaky Rod (@RodSneaky) May 7, 2019
Wray was doing a semantic dance; NOT rebutting anything AG Barr said.
He said he had no 'personal' knowledge of the investigations. That doesn't mean they are not occurring outside his purview. The congress may be stupid.
He isn't...— Trumpster (@Gettingtrump) May 8, 2019
So many people turned on Wray today...they took the word of the fake news media instead of listening carefully to what he really said. Have we learned nothing about how the media spins things to fit THEIR narrative? https://t.co/WDSojIB7Oo— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) May 8, 2019
Why are we so dang polite?
*******************************************************
I don’t know, I’m not, not on here, not in my job, not ever...I was a truck driver, and I rode a Harley and you don’t do that being a ‘Lady’ and survive if your nice...
This B.S. of waiting is just that B.S. Bring the wood, the matches, the ropes and lets have a ‘going to burn in hell for time and all eternity’ party for the libs, ALL OF THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, a “mistake”. Mmm hmm. Realized they went just a teeny bit too far.
Aholes.
If you log out of twitter can you see? I actually registered on twitter but never got the hang of it, so I’m never logged in.
More on Wray today:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1125840000921350144.html
1) “I, personally, don’t have any evidence of that sort”
He could have just said “no”. But he didn’t. He specified that HE doesn’t have any evidence on it.
We all know full well that the IG, oversight watchdog of DOJ/FBI, has this evidence.
Wray is covertly tipping anons off.
FBI Director Christopher Wray on “spying”: “That’s not the term I would use.” http://hill.cm/lPV312W
2) The dems are idiots, but they aren’t stupid. They staged this question very sneakily. They didn’t ask him if he had SEEN and evidence of illegal surveillance, they asked him if he HAD any. Knowing full well the IG has this evidence not Wray, giving media a narrative to spin.
3) They get the headline “FBI Director says there is no illegal surveillance”, they get to further spin their lie. Very sneaky move and they think they have won the day. But in reality Wray is keeping quiet about the ongoing investigations while now being praised by the dems/MSM.
4) Can you see how it could be beneficial for the dems/MSM to trust Wray?
Can you see how it was beneficial for us that the dems/MSM trusted Mueller and RR?
Can you see a trend developing?
The MSM/dems certainly don’t notice the trend. They are taking the bait... AGAIN!
5) Wray is killing multiple birds with one stone. He is feeding the media false headlines that will later show the sheep that the media is dishonest (just like the 2+ year Russia/mueller debacle), keeping the ongoing investigations hidden, while also dropping a hint to anons.
6) I see many of you in the MAGA corner of twitter losing your minds over this Wray situation and you are acting irrationally cuz people like Dan Bongino are fueling the disinformation and Kabuki theater.
Assess. Think logically. Allow Clandestine RR to settle your nerves.
END/
Alright squad, the people need to see this one cuz they are irrationally losing it. Help me help them and get this out there
Yeah, maybe so but I’d be deeply saddened I didn’t do my part. After all, it takes a Village.
Can I come? I’ll donate ten gallons of gas.
******************************************************
Of course you can as long as I get to strike the first match!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow, interesting watching that segment of Wray’s hearing.
Congress critters are really squirming about Barr’s investigation of the origins of the counter surveillance operation against POTUS. Last week the NY Times was calling the spy a “cloaked investigator”. They are so desperate they are trying to remove the word “spy” from general usage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
